>Nonsense. Even a goodsized RV, say 12 x 40 is far smaller and
>far more energy-efficient for heating and AC than the standard
>1500 square foot house. Which may also have a couple of cars
>in the driveway.
>>Nonsense. Even a goodsized RV, say 12 x 40 is far smaller and
>>far more energy-efficient for heating and AC than the standard
>>1500 square foot house. Which may also have a couple of cars
>>in the driveway.
>You obviously have no clue. The "R" factor in any RV is <1/4 to, at
>best, 1/2 that of any modern home. In fact my last srick/brick had
>wall R-factors of 24, interior walls of 12 or 18 and roof of 36. Yes,
>it was custom. My neighbor had electric bills of $1200/mo and mine
>were tops of 300.
Your neighbour's house sounds a lot more 'standard' than yours.
Which proves my point.
You both must have electric heating. I have natural gas,
about $2000- a year. Electricity usually less than $40-
per month.
>And what do the 'couple of cars' have to do with home energy
>efficiency?
Didn't say it did. OP complained about RV driving costs too.
Dean - 09 Sep 2007 17:35 GMT
We were both all electric. Mine 3600 sq. ft. and his was 6k+. In
Arizona, we rarely had heat on. No, mine was not standard, rather
designed by one who knew it was cheaper to prevent than to accept
shoddy.
> >>Nonsense. Even a goodsized RV, say 12 x 40 is far smaller and
> >>far more energy-efficient for heating and AC than the standard
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Didn't say it did. OP complained about RV driving costs too.