Calling All Christians.

You say that the Bible is the true word of God, and it does not have any
errors in it. Well, in that case please give me an account of the death of
Jesus and his subsequent resurrection, without any discrepancies.

Now this is the mainstay of your religious beliefs, and highly appropriate
as it is the feast of the Pagan Goddess Estre, Ishtar or Astarte, after whom
Easter was originally named. The Goddess of Spring, whose Holy day was
stolen by the Christians and used as the time when their God was supposed to
have given his son as a Saviour.

What I want you to do is simple really. : From the 165 verses in the Bible
that give an account of what happened beginning on, well, lets make it easy
for you and say Easter Morning going through to the Ascension; give me a
simple chronological statement of events , but miss nothing out that the
Bible says happened. : Document where and when events occurred, and who said
what and why.

Just to help you on your way I'll give you a few examples of what I need to
see. :-

 1.. Who were the women who visited the tomb?
 2) What time did they visit the tomb?
 3) What was the reason they went to the tomb?
 4) Was the tomb open or closed when they arrived?
 5) Who was already there?
 6) Where exactly where they?
 7) What did they say?
Please also include the accounts given in Acts, not just the four accounts
given by Matthew, Mark Luke and John. You can also include the mention Paul
makes of events in Corinthians.Can YOU do this simple task as partial proof
that the Bible is inerrant?

...

Before you embark upon this errand I feel  I should let you in on something.

time again. Is this an error of translation? A case of Papal editing maybe?
No, apparently not in this case. : The original Bible manuscripts used seem
to be in contradiction with one another in the greek. : Now what should that
say to you when looked at in the wider sense? Well if just this one piece of
information has conflicting accounts from different writers, then surely all
those writers must be errant in other details also. : This then throws into
question the accuracy of the four Gospel accounts, and indeed the other
Gospel accounts contained in the Nag Hammadi Library for that matter. The
most glaring inaccuracy, and the one with the most serious implications is
that of the Apostle Paul in Acts. Why? Paul reputedly wrote a large amount
of the New Testament, on which a lot of past and modern-day Christian
doctrine is based. This,then, throws into question the accuracy of a good
part of the New Testament, and indeed brings suspicion upon the other
unmentioned writers such as Timothy. Such glaring inaccuracies clearly
demonstrate that the Bible is in no way divinely inspired by some infallible
superdeity; in which case it leads us to ask the question of exactly how
much of the writings are bourne of the writer's own political agenda?

Of course some of the writings have indeed been the subject of Papal editing
both by omission and addition. But how much accuracy can we credit to even
the original unedited, untranslated, writings. Seemingly from the foregoing,
not a lot. It cartainly wouldn't be a publication in which I'd put my faith;
and as for running my life by it, and/or building my core beliefs upon its
teachings, forget it; I'd rather use Winnie the Pooh as my life-guide!
(Although those countless sessions stood on a bridge over a river playing
pooh-sticks would would be a gargantuanly unproductive waste of time.)

Stepping along the ladder of consequence as the ripples spread out from
source, the entire fabric of modern Christianity shakes, cracks and a few
pinnacles topple as if hit by an earthquake, under the waves made by these
facts. - But this single insight alone is nothing compared with the sum
total of facts, some of blatant forgery and deception, others of extreme
violence and genocide, which go together to rock this pitiful
control-religion to its foundations. ...But that's another story.