 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / October 2007A Strange Question about Math & RVs
Hi Folks, I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed in repair or usage of RVs that I can add to www.fast-math.org. BTW, you might find the mileage calculator that's already there quite interesting. If you have any ideas, please let me know. Take care, - Jeff - About the only math problem i can think of for RVing is : How much wood can a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood ? Its relevant to RVing cause RVers use alot of wood for fires. > About the only math problem i can think of for RVing is : How much > wood can a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood ? Its > relevant to RVing cause RVers use alot of wood for fires. Would you like to condense that into a mathematical equation using calculus notation? About the only math problem i can think of for RVing is : How much wood can a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood ? Its relevant to RVing cause RVers use alot of wood for fires. 'Would you like to condense that into a mathematical equation using calculus notation?' REPLY: I cant explain it in calculus notation , but, heres a rough practical equation i came up with : Table: If ---- TW= (total wood) HWC= (hungry WoodChuck) AW= available wood SOC= speed of chuck DOC=depth of chuck Chuck=name of the Critter ---- Then , to determine the total wood that could be produced .. this formula should be considered : TW = Chuck + AW^ 2 x 5.5 " x 44 mph x 90% efficiency (divided by) 3.14 (minus) BM . **Disclaimer: This is dependent on Chuck having got a good nights rest and having experienced a splendid BM (bowel movement) the night before. Ah.... Go chuck yourself.. Couldn't resist.. About the only math problem i can think of for RVing is : How much wood can a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood ? Its relevant to RVing cause RVers use alot of wood for fires. 'Would you like to condense that into a mathematical equation using calculus notation?' REPLY: I cant explain it in calculus notation , but, heres a rough practical equation i came up with : Table: If ---- TW= (total wood) HWC= (hungry WoodChuck) AW= available wood SOC= speed of chuck DOC=depth of chuck Chuck=name of the Critter ---- Then , to determine the total wood that could be produced .. this formula should be considered : TW = Chuck + AW^ 2 x 5.5 " x 44 mph x 90% efficiency (divided by) 3.14 (minus) BM . **Disclaimer: This is dependent on Chuck having got a good nights rest and having experienced a splendid BM (bowel movement) the night before. Ah.... Go chuck yourself.. Couldn't resist.. REPLY: And...Chuck you Farley ! "Bill" <bargerw@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:bhvUi.46617$c9.13788 @bignews8.bellsouth.net: > Ah.... Go chuck yourself.. > > Couldn't resist.. One *can* resist echoing an idiot's postings. <EG> The next time you have a "brain fart", just post your own reply. <VEG> > Hi Folks, > I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed > in repair or usage of RVs that I can add to www.fast-math.org. Hitch weight is recommended to be between 10-12% of the trailer weight. 75% is the "rule of thumb" when considering the real weight of a towable against the tow rating of the tow vehicle. This allows for a margin of safety as opposed to towing a trailer that weighs EXACTLY the rated towing capacity of the tow vehicle. Example: 5,000-lb tow rating = 3750-lb trailer. Have fun!  Signature:) JR > Hi Folks, > I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Take care, > - Jeff - 85 per cent of postings to RV newsgroups are off topic, including your spam. > Hi Folks, > I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Take care, > - Jeff - Metacentric heights and radii for various percent filled holding and water tanks. Fuel economy vs tire pressure. Fuel economy vs headwind as a function of cross sectional area and prismatic coefficient. > Fuel economy vs tire pressure. > Fuel economy vs headwind as a function of cross sectional area and prismatic > coefficient. Can't have a calculator for either of those really. It would only be a guesstimate. Too many other factors play a role. The % difference in mpg will vary greatly depending on the vehicle, terrain and numerous other factors. > Hi Folks, > I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Take care, > - Jeff - Jeff i sent you an email but on the computer bytes page, whatever value is entered, the gigabytes and terabytes show up as the same value, which is incorrect unless I"m missing something. >> Hi Folks, >> I'm wondering if there are any math conversions currently needed [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >entered, the gigabytes and terabytes show up as the same value, which is >incorrect unless I"m missing something. He won't see your comments. he spammed the 'can I add' article to a whole bunch of newsgroups. It's safe to assume a 'hit and run' posting. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.