Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / November 2007
Fewer posts.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Dean - 30 Oct 2007 18:21 GMT I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 pure-D bullshit crap. How refreshing! Ahhhhh.
Hal - 31 Oct 2007 01:13 GMT > I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and > DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 > pure-D bullshit crap. How refreshing! Ahhhhh. Really Good Move...but, as I'm also probably filtered out, you would see this
Hal
Dean - 31 Oct 2007 19:40 GMT >> I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and >> DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Hal You are not killfiled yet, but keep trying!
Dave in Lake Villa - 01 Nov 2007 02:18 GMT 'I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 pure-D bullshit crap'
REPLY: You can alleviate listening (reading) about Christ...but....youll still need to decide what you are going to do with him , your personal sins, and pretending that there is no personal Theistic Creator to whom you will be accountable to one day, soon.
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 01 Nov 2007 03:18 GMT > 'I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and > DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > personal Theistic Creator to whom you will be accountable to one day, > soon. Hey Dimwit; don't you know what filtered means? It means plonked, ignored, sent to coventry. - You're posting off-topic which makes you a troll. (I know I am too - and I admit to being a troll *in* *this* *group* *only*; but people can easily plonk me if they don't waant to read what I write - Other than the web tv-ers who cant. ROFL
Ken - 01 Nov 2007 04:26 GMT On Oct 31, 7:18 pm, "Dr.H@l0nf1r?$" <sha...@NOSPAM.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
> > 'I recently opted to filter Chad, DanL, Todd, Harry, Ken, Halon?? and > > DILV. I now only average 10 or so real posts a day instead of 25-40 [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > people can easily plonk me if they don't waant to read what I write - Other > than the web tv-ers who cant. ROFL Not only is dimwitted dumbfuck an a.shole, but a stupid a.shole at that!
Dave in Lake Villa - 01 Nov 2007 12:45 GMT 'You're posting off-topic which makes you a troll.'
REPLY: This is a rediculous statement of what a Troll is ; if you go to virtually any NG you find off topics . And it seems one is redeemed if he/she places the 'OT' warning in the post header ! The word Troll is highly misused just like the word Evolution and Dimwit is ; others can call me 'a Troll' or any other name if they desire...but I purchased the capabilities of accessing NG's and if others post off topic as a norm , then, I shall too ... unless the NG Charter says not to specifically. As for people 'plonking me'... my feelings and my WebTv Terminal are not offended in the least.
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 01 Nov 2007 15:49 GMT > 'You're posting off-topic which makes you a troll.' > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > not to specifically. As for people 'plonking me'... my feelings and > my WebTv Terminal are not offended in the least. There are a small percentage of people who disrespect netiquette, known as "kooks" and/or "trolls", who delight in causing disruption by posting OT in any number of groups and provoking arguments. In a sense I could be considered to be a kook in a limited way inasmuch as I have a duty to follow your trollings around in an attemopt to warn the unwary as to your unsavoury nature, hypocrisy, dishonesty, adverse sexuality, and the unbelievably ridiculous nature of your Christotaliban rhetoric. I am *not* against Christianity as such; I'm against your brand of the Xian disease that rots and subtly permeates society with its disillusionment and falsehoods. I have no disruptive intent however, nor any intention of becoming "famed" as a particular online stereotype; although I realise that by my very presence on Usenet this will no doubt occur.
Dimwit is your nickname; not my choosing, but a nickname which you have earned by your postings, and which has been assigned to you by your, mainly male, detractors. Your reasoning is faulty. : If I had a particular axe to grind with society I could say that I have the capabilities of accessing society by birthright, and therefore if others behave antisocially with disruptive intent then so shall I, unless there's a sign posted everywhere saying that antiosociality is forbidden (I have a feeling that you've already tried this.)- It's the same type of reasoning, but it wouldn't make me at all popular by any means, and I would have to pay the price of rebuke and semi-exclusion from society if I were to do so. I could come up with the lame excuse that I don't live for the applause of men and women; but that would simply add to my tarnished image. - Therefore I prefer to abide by the dictates of decency as far as society is concerned, and at least appear to a larger extent to be going along with rationality rather than becoming a rebel without a cause and sticking out like a sore thumb; no matter what my personal feelings are with regard to it.
Dave in Lake Villa - 02 Nov 2007 00:26 GMT 'I am *not* against Christianity as such; I'm against your brand of the Xian disease that rots and subtly permeates society with its disillusionment and falsehoods'
REPLY: Are you saying that The Christian Faith 'Rots' society due to : The 10 Commandments which brings society to moral calamity ? The audacity of calling a person a Human Being with great worth and dignity, even at conception ? The terrible Institution of Marriage ? Family values are of great disdain ? The Bible actually calling sexual immorality wrong ? The repressive mandate of expecting 2 adults to wait till their wedding night to consummate their marriage ? The disillusioning idea that a wife should be a helper toward the Husband in a Godly marriage ? The falsehood that Pond Scum isnt our great ancestor and that Human Beings not only got their personality traits from God but were fashioned in his image for a vital personal relationship ? The intolerance of calling something WRONG when it is , instead of being apathetic and passive about it ?
Yes indeed....a society whereby its inhabitants practice whatever they think is right in their own mind based on feelings, would rather show tolerance over taking a stand for whats right, whatever desire you have should be fulfilled even if it means marrying a same sex person or the neighbors Dog just so long as you say you love it, and practicing killing unborn children for the sake of sexual freedom/hedonism as decided on by the female , et al... adds wellbeing , order, and civility to a Society .???
It never dawned on me that the Christian Faith was such a bad influence on Society ; perhaps I should consider being a Pagan-Humanist which would help society along toward the utopia of self destruction .
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 02 Nov 2007 01:02 GMT > 'I am *not* against Christianity as such; I'm against your brand of > the Xian disease that rots and subtly permeates society with its [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > relationship ? The intolerance of calling something WRONG when it > is , instead of being apathetic and passive about it ? I'm saying exactly what I said.
> Yes indeed....a society whereby its inhabitants practice whatever they > think is right in their own mind based on feelings, would rather show [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > freedom/hedonism as decided on by the female , et al... adds > wellbeing , order, and civility to a Society .??? Whatever turns you on Dave.
> It never dawned on me that the Christian Faith was such a bad > influence on Society ; perhaps I should consider being a > Pagan-Humanist which would help society along toward the utopia of > self destruction . If that's what you feel is right for you then by all means do so; but remember that you must exercise due responsibility in all things and that everything which you send out will return to you threefold.
Dave in Lake Villa - 02 Nov 2007 02:58 GMT 'but remember that you must exercise due responsibility in all things '
REPLY: Like not saying something to those who practice irresponsibility and not taking a stand for whats right ?
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 02 Nov 2007 04:58 GMT > 'but remember that you must exercise due responsibility in all things > ' > > REPLY: Like not saying something to those who practice > irresponsibility and not taking a stand for whats right ? What are you on? Have you been taking some kind of mind altering drugs?
Ken - 02 Nov 2007 16:31 GMT On Nov 1, 8:58 pm, "Dr.H@l0nf1r?$" <sha...@NOSPAM.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
> > 'but remember that you must exercise due responsibility in all things > > ' [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > What are you on? Have you been taking some kind of mind altering drugs? Mind numbing creationist fundy religion IS his drug of choice
Religion - Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism etc, etc - is by definition irrational and, more than that, it is an irrationality that lays claim to the complete truth. How dangerous is that? The fear of offending religious, cultural and even racial sensibilities has grown so pervasive that hardly a word of sense is openly spoken on the matter. An example of this tendency is the debate, or controversy, that is beginning to take shape around Mel Gibson's new film, The Passion, the filmstar's directorial interpretation of the gospels.
The only people who do bother to draw attention to the contradiction between individual self-determination and God's omnipotent will - people, for example, such as Richard Dawkins - risk appearing like fanatics themselves.
There is a lot of truth in that - no matter how nonsensical a religious doctrine is, pointing out that it is nonsensical will typically be labeled as "fanatical," not the devoted belief in that nonsense. Why is it acceptable to criticize religious doctrines from another religious perspective, but not from an irreligious perspective? Why the idea that a belief is "intolerant" given a hearing, but not the idea that the same belief is simply absurd?
Dave in Lake Villa - 01 Nov 2007 12:46 GMT 'It means plonked, ignored, sent to coventry'
REPLY: Coventry !? I think i passed thru that town when i lived in England.
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 01 Nov 2007 16:07 GMT > 'It means plonked, ignored, sent to coventry' > > REPLY: Coventry !? I think i passed thru that town when i lived in > England. You no doubt did; it's kind of east of Birmingham, near Stratford-Upon-Avon and Leamingtom Spa. I used to live in Warwick for a while years ago; so I've been around that area somewhat.
Have you ever heard of Hampton Lucy; it's a quaint little village in that area that I've a feeling you'd fall in love with as soom as you saw it as I did. :
Turning into the virtually single-track lane off the B road that runs nearby you walk along the tarmacced road with its green banks slightly elevated on either side. To the right runs a fairly tall unkempt hedgerow parallel to the road above the bank, teaming with wildlife and abounding in the song of chaffinch and blue-tit.To the left the bank drops away and down to a brook edging the watermeadow, fringed with reeds and water-lillies, plus semi-wild and native vegetation. Gossamer-winged dragonflies hover above the babbling waters and mayflies are gulped down from the surface by the feeding trout as they land upon the still pools to the far-edge. Looking further on the road arcs round to what appears to be a tiny ornate village with its interspersed dwellings partially-hidden by the leafy canopy of old unspoiled mature trees, and at the far end one can easily notice the small pointed spire of the village church, as one brings one's eyes back across the grassy meadow fringed with larch and deciduous mature giant beeches, with horses grazing the lush grass, and back to the babbling brook as you walk along the lane basking in the heat from the summer sun.
Do visit if you're ever in the area.; it's worth the journey for the sight alone.
Dave in Lake Villa - 02 Nov 2007 00:33 GMT 'Turning into the virtually single-track lane off the B road that runs nearby you walk along the tarmacced road with its green banks slightly elevated on either side. To the right runs a fairly tall unkempt hedgerow parallel to the road above the bank, teaming with wildlife and abounding in the song of chaffinch and blue-tit.To the left the bank drops away and down to a brook edging the watermeadow, fringed with reeds and water-lillies, plus semi-wild and native vegetation. Gossamer-winged dragonflies hover above the babbling waters and mayflies are gulped down from the surface by the feeding trout as they land upon the still pools to the far-edge. Looking further on the road arcs round to what appears to be a tiny ornate village with its interspersed dwellings partially-hidden by the leafy canopy of old unspoiled mature trees, and at the far end one can easily notice the small pointed spire of the village church, as one brings one's eyes back across the grassy meadow fringed with larch and deciduous mature giant beeches, with horses grazing the lush grass, and back to the babbling brook as you walk along the lane basking in the heat from the summer sun. '
REPLY: Did you copy this out of a Travel Guide to Britain ?
Dr.H@l0nf1r£$ - 02 Nov 2007 01:04 GMT > 'Turning into the virtually single-track lane off the B road that runs > nearby you walk along the tarmacced road with its green banks slightly [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > REPLY: Did you copy this out of a Travel Guide to Britain ? I don't know whether I should feel complimented or insulted? I sat down and authored that piece ad-hoc. It appears that you're impressed?
|
|
|