Harry,
It looks like the older horizontal propane tanks on RVs can't be upraded to
meet the current fill valve regulations:
http://www.damouth.com/RVStuff/OPD.shtml
Because of this they are exempted from the regulation but DO REQUIRE proper
labelling on the tank to notify the person filling the tank that it can be
overfilled.
Even if safely filled there are dangers:
http://www.rversonline.org/02Propane.html
When you purchase it, it's in a liquid state. Tank gets filled to 80%.
Allows for 20% expansion. When vaproized, it expands 270 to 1. Liquid
propane "boils" at -44F. If surrounding area is colder than that, it stays
in liquid form, and won't come out of tank. Not usually a problem w/propane.
However, as a rule fill your tank in the same general locality as you're
going to use it. Example to avoid: filling a tank in freezing temperatures
in the northern states, and driving to Arizona: When you filled the tank it
was filled to 80% capacity; but going to the heat of Arizona could cause the
propane tank to become "overfilled".
Propane expands 1.5% for every 10 degree increase in temperature. That's why
tanks are never filled beyond 80%. It's crucial to keep filled tanks so that
escape valve is on top so that any "overfilled" volume will be expelled as a
vapor, and not in its liquid form. This is why it's dangerous to paint
propane tanks a dark color to "match your rig" -- it will heat up to higher
temperatures and become "overfilled".
A 15 degree difference can make your tank overfilled if initially filled to
80%. A 50 degree difference can make it overfilled by 55% beyond 100%, that
is over most design safety margins!
I think the Canadian Government requires Canadian RVers to take a course in
propane handling and safety.
Dean - 21 Nov 2007 16:39 GMT
>http://www.rversonline.org/02Propane.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>I think the Canadian Government requires Canadian RVers to take a course in
>propane handling and safety.
Your math and overall analysis are so faulty, they don't deserve
comment. And I have NEVER heard that Canucks need a course. Try
doing some research and note your sources.
dean
Steve - 21 Nov 2007 19:52 GMT
>>http://www.rversonline.org/02Propane.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> dean
Gosh Dean, I started off the post by linking the source and 70% of the post
is a direct quote from the source.
What part of the analysis is faulty? The burden of proof rests with you.
You have never heard that Canadians need a course in propane handling. Is
whether you heard something or not your only criteria for something being
true or false? If you never heard of "x", then you believe that there is no
such thing as "x" until someone tells you about "x". Reality exists for you
when it only enters your mind?
Like I said, I posted a link and quoted it. If you care to go into details
I'll gladly explain my reasoning and gather some more research to help you
understand. However it appears you may already understand since you feel
competent enough to declare faulty analysis. Could you please point out the
errors, not only for my sake, but for the sake of others reading this
thread? That would be very helpful and beneficial.
Thanks!