>> > Instead of putting a resistor on the sender side of the circuit, put
>> > the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Im guessing at full the guage needs about 210 ohms.. and at empty 0
> ohms... like i said i just put in a brand new 90 ohm sending unit...
The sending unit is 90 ohms. But you have to get the correct amount of
current through the gauge for it to read correctly. A 90 ohm sender draws
more current than a 200 ohm sender. This sender draws 2.2 times more current
through the gauge than your old one. A resistor must be placed across the
gauge to reduce the current flowing through it. The gauge has an intrinsic
resistance probably about 5 ohms or so. So a resistance of a value equal to
the gauge resistance placed across the gauge will reduce the gauge current
by 1/2. The resistance of the sending unit is alone is not sufficient to
determine the value of the resistor to be placed in shunt with the gauge.
You can place a 200 ohm potentiometer across the gauge and dial in the
correct value. Most potentiometers have three legs so the center leg will
have to be connected to one of the other legs.
Steve
st - 28 Nov 2007 01:42 GMT
> >> > Instead of putting a resistor on the sender side of the circuit, put
> >> > the
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Kool beans.. can u suggest a radio shack part number that will be
sufficient? Radio shack is right next to me.....
Steve - 28 Nov 2007 14:26 GMT
>> >> > Instead of putting a resistor on the sender side of the circuit, put
>> >> > the
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> Kool beans.. can u suggest a radio shack part number that will be
> sufficient? Radio shack is right next to me.....
Caveat:
We do not know the resistance of your gauge. When the sender reads zero ohms
it should not draw lots of current, so the gauge resistance may be higher,
which makes sense. Try this and see what happens:
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2062354&cp=&sr=1&origkw=po
tentiometer&kw=potentiometer&parentPage=search
It's a 10K value and may be touchy to get the setting correct. Hopefully
your gauge resistance is on the order of 1K or more which should make the
adjustment easier.
Steve
st - 28 Nov 2007 17:47 GMT
> >> "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
ok i got the pot installed like u said .. middle and side to one side
of sending unit.. and a lone side to ground of sending unit... my ohm
meter reads 90 at full and 0 at empty still... the thing i does do
when adjusted is lower the full down to nothing if i wish.... that
would be great if my sending unit was a 250 ohm at full lets say and i
needed to make full read 90 for my guage.......did i connect it
correttly? should i run it in series instead of paralell????
Steve - 28 Nov 2007 17:54 GMT
>> >> "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
> needed to make full read 90 for my guage.......did i connect it
> correttly? should i run it in series instead of paralell????
The potentiometer goes across the meter (gauge) in the dashboard, not across
the sending unit. Read my posts over very carefully.
Perhaps someone else can help explain this all better than I can. Help
please!
Steve
st - 28 Nov 2007 18:47 GMT
> >> "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 117 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Steve,
I just did as u said and the potentiometer burnt up..... I guess my
guage is the culprit.... It reads just under 1/2 tanks at full on the
sending unit... i know all this because i have a spare sendning unit
out side the tank im using for testing purposes.....I guess i should
install an aftermarket bolt on 90 ohm guage at this point dont you
think?? thanks for all your help...
Steve - 28 Nov 2007 19:28 GMT
>> >> "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 143 lines]
> install an aftermarket bolt on 90 ohm guage at this point dont you
> think?? thanks for all your help...
Go with the 200 ohm sender.
st - 28 Nov 2007 22:47 GMT
> >> "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 151 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Steve.. im getting close..
i pulled the orig guage out of the cluster..... there are 3 poles 2 on
the sides and one in the middle bottom..
with an ohm meter i get 87 ohms on each side post ... about 187 with
bottom post and 1 side post.... maybee my wire in the rv is goofed....
everyone i speak to says 1984 p-30 is 90 ohm sender and 90 ohm
guage... so could it be the sender wire is possibly touching ground
somewhere??? thanks and thanks for ur patience....
st - 28 Nov 2007 23:04 GMT
> > "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 166 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
I tested the beige wire from the sender in the cluster wiring and got
nothing touching ground.... meanwhile if i turn on the key with the
sender in full position it shows 87 ohms .. when key is off it shows
90 ohms....
Bill - 29 Nov 2007 02:28 GMT
> > "st" <shane...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 129 lines]
> install an aftermarket bolt on 90 ohm guage at this point dont you
> think?? thanks for all your help...
I see what you probably did. If your tank was near empty the bypass
shunt around your Full side electromagnet (the internal tank variable
resistor) was close to zero ohms because the system wanted all the
current going through the Empty side electromagnet. Now, if you put
the potentiometer across the electromagnet on the empty side
(correctly I might add only if the tank were full) and lowered the
resistance (you'd want to start with that at full resistance) as you
lowered the resistance the current increased because it was the only
thing between the battery and ground (except for the tank internal
variable resistance which would be almost zero with a low level of
fuel). As the potentiometer approached zero resistance the current
across the battery terminals did exactly what would be expected if it
were shown a short. The potentiometer adjustment needs to be done
with a full tank because you'd be adjusting the needle from halfway at
a full tank to full at a full tank. By the way, I'm made that very
mistake and burned up a variable resistor in an application years
ago. Once the needle reaches Full, remove the pot and measure it then
put that value in place across the meter (should go without saying I
suppose).
Bill
Mark Sparge - 28 Nov 2007 20:10 GMT
> >> > Instead of putting a resistor on the sender side of the circuit, put
> >> > the
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Quite a bit of this is correct --- but the resistor must be placed in
series with the gauge/sender to increase resistance. Rt=R1+R2+R3....
Resistance in parallel will ALWAYS be less than the value of the
smallest resistance. 1/RT=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3
Good Luck,
Mark
Bill - 29 Nov 2007 02:02 GMT
> >> > Instead of putting a resistor on the sender side of the circuit, put
> >> > the
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Steve
I see what you're saying. Looking at the meter sketch from the
earlier link, putting a resistor across the electromagnet that draws
the needle toward empty will allow two paths of current and all that
current will go through the electromagnet on the full side when the
tank is full and the resistance to ground (path shunting the
electromagnet on the Full side) via the meter is high. So, with a
full tank put a decade resistance box across the meter to the high leg
and lower the resistance until the meter reads full. When the tank is
empty the path through the gauge to ground will have a very low
resistance and the electromagnet on the high side sees no current
while the magnet on the empty side sees all the current it needs to
show empty. The gauge would swing fully between E and F but, and not
that it matters much, will the reading be linear?
Bill