Osama Hussien Obama is just way too risky to have as the Democratic
nomination for president. The Republicans are just chomping at the bit
to tear him into pieces. He is weak on many fronts, here are just a
few:
1. America not ready for a black president.
2. Admitted previous drug use is really bad, but how do we now he
wasn't dealing or doing even harder stuff? How long has he been clean?
3. He is a Moslem and comes from a radical Moslem background. His
parents are very pro Moslem and work outside of this country. They are
security risks.
4. We don't even know if his kids are his own.
5. Inexperience and not tough enough to stand on issues.
6. He is against a war we are winning.
7. He is overly ambitious.
8. No track record, certainly not long term.
I believe Hillary Clinton is the best choice for America. She has many
positives that dwarf Hussien Obama.
1. Raised in the heartland with traditional American values.
2. 7 years as Senator, 8 years as co-President and many many years as
co-Governor of Arkansas.
3. An established, accomplished attorney.
4. Long history of fighting for the minorities.
5. Authored key legislation.
6. Focal point of 9/11 aid and relief for victims.
7. Successful family woman. Daughter graduated from Oxford, then one
to McKinsey & Co.
8. Compassionate and tunes into all people, not just blacks.
9. Fights for what she believes.
10. Can be trusted with the great powers of the Presidency.
11. Gas prices will drop immediately if she is elected. She has said
this and with her policies it will happen.
12. Places the country before herself, a great desire to serve.
I believe Hillary is the best choice for American. Hussien Obama's 15
minutes of fame are just about up and many Americans are coming to
realize this. If you vote Democrat, Hillary is the one!
Weston
Jim - 26 Dec 2007 02:08 GMT
Weston Packer wrote:>
> 6. He is against a war we are winning.
Mission Accomplished! Saying it does not make it so.
> 8. No track record, certainly not long term.
This wasn't important last time, was it?
miles - 26 Dec 2007 04:17 GMT
> Weston Packer wrote:>
>> 6. He is against a war we are winning.
>
> Mission Accomplished! Saying it does not make it so.
The ship did complete it's mission. Whats your point?
Dan Listermann - 26 Dec 2007 14:14 GMT
>> Weston Packer wrote:>
>>> 6. He is against a war we are winning.
>>
>> Mission Accomplished! Saying it does not make it so.
>
> The ship did complete it's mission. Whats your point?
Woo, a new split hair!
GBinNC - 26 Dec 2007 14:41 GMT
>> The ship did complete it's mission. Whats your point?
>Woo, a new split hair!
Along with two apostrophe errors in only nine words <g>.
Could be a new record here.
GB in NC
miles - 26 Dec 2007 23:53 GMT
> Along with two apostrophe errors in only nine words <g>.
>
> Could be a new record here.
Woohoo, we have a new resident spell checker with way too much time on
their hands! Let us know what the record is as it's very important to you.
GBinNC - 27 Dec 2007 00:07 GMT
>> Along with two apostrophe errors in only nine words <g>.
>>
>> Could be a new record here.
>Woohoo, we have a new resident spell checker with way too much time on
>their hands! Let us know what the record is as it's very important to you.
New? I've been posting here almost every day since '98, except for one
year I took off about three years ago.
And while I *am* a "spell checker" (although I would hyphenate that), my
comment had to do with punctuation, not spelling.
And a singular noun "with way too much time on *their* hands"? LOL.
GB in NC
miles - 27 Dec 2007 00:16 GMT
> And a singular noun "with way too much time on *their* hands"? LOL.
Hmm. How about you take some of that free time of yours and scan all of
usenet for us. You can create a web page keeping track of all the
spelling, punctuation etc. Too funny!
JerryD(upstateNY) - 27 Dec 2007 01:29 GMT
GBinNC wrote: And a singular noun "with way too much time on *their* hands"?
LOL.<<<
I saw that (there hands) and thought......no, GBinNC couldn't have written
that. <g>

Signature
JerryD(upstateNY)
GBinNC - 27 Dec 2007 01:46 GMT
"JerryD\(upstateNY\)" <jerryd@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>GBinNC wrote: And a singular noun "with way too much time on *their* hands"?
>LOL.<<<
>I saw that (there hands) and thought......no, GBinNC couldn't have written
>that. <g>
I didn't write it. I quoted it.
And it was "their hands," not "there hands" <g>.
(We seem to be going in circles here.)
GB in NC
Hugh - 26 Dec 2007 03:30 GMT
Weston Packer wrote: a whole bunch of lies.
snipped
> Weston
Moron.
Hugh
Jim - 26 Dec 2007 15:51 GMT
> Weston Packer wrote: a whole bunch of lies.
> snipped
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Moron.
> Hugh
He really should be embarrassed to post something that makes him look so
racist (#1) and ignorant.
IlBeBauck@gmail.com - 27 Dec 2007 00:12 GMT
> Osama Hussien Obama is just way too risky to have as the Democratic
> nomination for president. The Republicans are just chomping at the bit
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Weston
REPLY: But, doesnt she believe its perfectly alright to rip
developing Americans in the womb to pieces then have them sucked out
into a sink ... of which 95% of the time is due to sexual hedonism
gone (further) wrong ??? That doesnt sound too patriotic or caring
to me. I think she like all the other candidates shouldnt be voted
for . Ronald Reagan should be even though he isnt around any longer.