 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / May 2008Should I make her get a haircut?
My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being outside. She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for me. She uses too much water washing her long blonde hair. I'm thinking about demanding she cut her hair to maybe about shoulder length. But she's kinda vain and might refuse. What do you all think? Would you make your wife cut her hair if she was always using up almost a tank full of water what with the daily washing and rinsing? Not only that but it gets in the way most of the time when we make love. Here is a picture of her. It's for adults only. It's not porn but she's got no clothes on. So no children please. http://hosted.femjoy.com/galleries/110834_cbf875_tht430/pics/005.jpg -- Gregory Hall > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being outside. > She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for me. She uses [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall Wow! If my wife looked like that I'd get her a PROPANE water heater and install a 500 gallon freshwater tank. Maybe even a PROPANE powered hair dryer. Harry Harris ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being > outside. She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall Either upgrade your fresh water tankage or visit more waterfalls. BTW, nice troll, TROLL. > http://hosted.femjoy.com/galleries/110834_cbf875_tht430/pics/005.jpg > > -- > Gregory Hall WOW. But there are more than one beautiful blonde with long hair. Which one is your wife? > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being > outside. She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > http://hosted.femjoy.com/galleries/110834_cbf875_tht430/pics/005.jpg Rent the dvd "stripes", and get a hair buzz cutter......:) > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being outside. > She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for me. She uses too [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall REPLY: Two things come to mind : 1. You must have known how much water your wife was going to use from dating her prior, so, you dont really have any good justification for being controlling with her now. 2. If this person in the picture is really your wife, I think you both need some work on morals and values because it is wrong and in very poor taste that you would reveal her nudity to the world . Please bear in mind that i could care less what the current Culture endorses, promotes, or calls 'correct' . Hope this info helps from a plethera of standpoints. However...if you are just a Troll who enjoys embellishing , then you need to grow up asap. Best regards. On Apr 27, 4:20 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote: > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being outside. > She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for me. She uses [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall | REPLY: Two things come to mind : | 1. You must have known how much water your wife was going to use from | dating her prior, so, you dont really have any good justification for [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] | just a Troll who enjoys embellishing , then you need to grow up asap. | Best regards. Aren't you the same person as Dave in Lake Villa? If so, then you know that it says in the Bible that God created Adam and Eve (mankind) and they were naked. They had no shame of their nakedness and neither did God. Until Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil their nakedness was no big deal. God knew something was amiss the very moment he saw their hasty attempts to cover up their nakedness. He knew Satan had gotten to them. Apparently Satan has also gotten to you, sir, since you seem to embrace the works of Satan. I believe that what God created no man should attempt to call immoral? The very idea of the naked body being immoral tells me that your established religion has set itself up as a false god with its own prudish beliefs which its followers have set above God's law. You are attempting to contravene the true God whom you PRETEND to worship. Can you say blasphemy? Can you say hypocrite? You need to ask yourself if such blasphemy and hypocrisy are acceptable attributes in the very religious establishment you profess to belong to. As for justification for controlling my wife, does it not also say in YOUR Bible that the woman was created as a helpmate for her husband? That means a man should control the actions of his wife. It's his DUTY! It's God's LAW. A man who does not accept the natural order is not doing his duty to himself or to his God. Repent, sinner, before it's too late . . . -- Gregory Hall > <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > - Show quoted text - REPLY: Hello Greg. Yes, that is my former email addy. Im afraid that you have a couple of misconceptions, willfully twist the scriptures to suit your own lifestyle agenda of entitlement , and do not undertand the character of our wonderful Creator God. It was mankinds sin in the Garden that caused God to introduce clothing for thier naked bodies which is still the same reason why clothing is used today ; further, it is encumbant upon your wife not to expose herself in public and that is reserved ONLY for you as her commitment to your marriage . Plus, it is YOUR responsibility as her husband to protect your wife from others seeing her sexual parts which are meant for only YOU to enjoy ; to do otherwise, is a perversion to the very sanctity of marriage thusly ordained by God himself which he expects both of you to prevent. Lastly, it is NOT your responsibility 'to control' your wife as you allege ; it is your responsibility as a husband to treat your wife with respect, gentleness, honor, and to cherish her as Christ loved the Church. By allowing everyone and anyone to see her in the form of sexual intimacy , you have negated your responsibilitys as a respectful/honoring/and caring Husband and have instead, proved yourself to be the type of person the New Testament describes as a Reprobate Mind given over to fleshly desires and the things of this world which are not of God. Finally, God cannot be mocked by your feeble attempt at justifying rebellion nor can he be mocked by your deliberate twisting of his written word to mankind for correct and civil living. I trust you will have enough dignity and sincere sorrow to ask God for the forgiveness which you need to seek, then, to repent which means 'to turn from' your former/present ways that do not meet with the loving Creators mandates. Please express the same to your beloved wife. Thank you. > REPLY: Hello Greg. Yes, that is my former email addy. Im afraid > that you have a couple of misconceptions, willfully twist the > scriptures to suit your own lifestyle agenda of entitlement , and do > not undertand the character of our wonderful Creator God. That is your opinion, Dave, and I suppose you're entitled to it but please allow me to cite scripture to prove why most of your opinions do not agree with scripture. Of course, the Bible is a complicated book and sometimes it seems to be at odds with reality and even itself but it's main message is supposed to be to teach us how to love and understand our Creator. > It was > mankinds sin in the Garden that caused God to introduce clothing for > thier naked bodies which is still the same reason why clothing is used > today; It was, indeed Adam and Eve's sin of listening to Satan and disobeying Gods order to not eat of the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. But your Bible says the following: Genesis 3:21 "Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins and clothed them." It fails to say anything about why God did so. And it fails to make any mention of your claim that it was done to cover their sins and that people henceforth were never to remove their clothing in public. That is just organized religion misinterpretation, I'm afraid. A more sensible thing to think would be God provided them clothing to ease their discomfit and shame since God was not willing to take these away because the lesson he was teaching them is disobeying God has consequences. > further, it is encumbant upon your wife not to expose herself > in public and that is reserved ONLY for you as her commitment to your > marriage . Yet another organized religion tenet. Cite the scripture in your Bible, please, that supports your contention. > Plus, it is YOUR responsibility as her husband to protect > your wife from others seeing her sexual parts which are meant for only > YOU to enjoy ; to do otherwise, is a perversion to the very sanctity > of marriage thusly ordained by God himself which he expects both of > you to prevent. My gosh, Dave, but are you ever a prudish lout! Nowhere in your Bible does it make any such claim as you have written above. But scripture does say the following: Genesis3:16, "Unto the woman He said, I will greatly multiply they sorrow and they conception; in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. Seems to me when God says the husband shall rule over the wife it means just that. If a man is comfortable with his wife being naked and being photographed and indicates to her that he approves of that behavior then the wife is just doing her wifely duty while the husband is just following Gods edict. > Lastly, it is NOT your responsibility 'to control' > your wife as you allege ; it is your responsibility as a husband to > treat your wife with respect, gentleness, honor, and to cherish her as > Christ loved the Church. Nice sentiments but, yet again, they are not from your Bible but from some extra added rules and regulations organized sect religion has penned and is attempting to enforce. How can you say it is not the husbands responsibility to control his wife when your Bible clearly states the husband shall rule over the wife. If ruling over isn't control then tell me, Dave, just what is? > By allowing everyone and anyone to see her > in the form of sexual intimacy , you have negated your responsibilitys > as a respectful/honoring/and caring Husband and have instead, proved > yourself to be the type of person the New Testament describes as a > Reprobate Mind given over to fleshly desires and the things of this > world which are not of God. Gee whiz, Dave, but you and other religious sect followers seem to be so very uptight about nudity and sex. You've gotten so far over any sensible line that you equate a young woman enjoying nature in a private setting and not engaging in any sexual conduct whatsoever with the sex act. Can you say "uptight prude?" And then you compound your folly by saying my wife is a "thing of this world which are not of God." Well, excuse me! How do you know my wife is not of God. She was created by God, wasn't she? She is not committing any sin that I know of. If she were then she would not be able to take a bath, for example. Does God really want his children to go around filthy and to avoid even getting close to streams and glades? > Finally, God cannot be mocked by your > feeble attempt at justifying rebellion nor can he be mocked by your > deliberate twisting of his written word to mankind for correct and > civil living. May I suggest that it is YOU, sir, who are mocking God with your lame attempts to act like God? Your hypocritical attempts to put yourself in the place of God, to impose your false edicts and moral misconceptions upon others? You claim I mock God while I cite the scripture to buttress my claims and you just make vague references to religious sect screeds that are not Biblical. Remember that it says in your Bible that anybody who attempts to add to or take away from the Bible will not be going to Heaven. Read Revelation 22:17 please. Your religions sect nonsense is doing just that - attempting to add to or take away from the Bible. > I trust you will have enough dignity and sincere sorrow > to ask God for the forgiveness which you need to seek, then, to repent > which means 'to turn from' your former/present ways that do not meet > with the loving Creators mandates. Please express the same to your > beloved wife. Thank you. I need not ask for God's forgiveness because I obey his law as stated in the Bible. I have no need to repent of the fact that I follow God's commandments. It is you, sir, that needs to examine your misconceptions and mend your ways and ask for understanding before you attempt to teach that which you have so little understanding. -- Gregory Hall > <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall REPLY: Sorry Greg, but, it is so fundamental that God is a personal Creator who is infintely holy, moral, and unchangeable ... that even unchurched people know these basic character traits of the Creator. Your idea of how God is , is based on your self centered, liberal, uncontrolled agenda for how you want to live your life. Your exegesis of scripture is a travesty and is reconstituted to coincide with YOUR agenda . God cannot be mocked and you really need to surrender your life to God and his moral mandates which are for your own benefit as well as those you love. > <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall REPLY: Sorry....P.S. : Greg, Right now in your life based on your above testimony...you are only a 'Said-Christian' ; someone who knows a bit of christian-eze, may fill a pew in church from time to time, may go thru a few sacramental steps , etc....but you arent Born Again yet which Christ said you had to be in order to enter heaven. Christ said you can tell real Followers by the fruit they produce , or, the positive evidence from having had a real encounter with the living Christ. The Bible explicitly says that there will be a distancing of the worldly philosophies incl. immoral desires of the flesh one had before, in addition to a real hunger for the things of God including right living. Youre not there yet Greg, but you can be if you choose to be. But its going to require you to give your entire life over to Christ and a gradual but sure distancing of yourself from the lure of what the world considers 'important' . I trust you and your wife will choose this route making Christ your compass instead of the dictates of your Will. Regards, and...End. On Apr 29, 4:07 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote: > <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 166 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall >REPLY: Sorry....P.S. : Greg, Right now in your life based on your >above testimony...you are only a 'Said-Christian' ; someone who knows [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >will choose this route making Christ your compass instead of the >dictates of your Will. Regards, and...End. Well, I for one am glad that's over.......Geeeze. On Apr 29, 6:13 pm, "Lu Powell" <zxy...@ohmypapa.net> wrote: Well, I for one am glad that's over.......Geeeze As is everyone else FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to live from his Throne of Omnipotence Hal >FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible >thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to >live from his Throne of Omnipotence >Hal And just FYI -- most people who reply to him (that would be you) also get filtered by many of the rest of us. GB in NC >>FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible >>thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to >>live from his Throne of Omnipotence >>Hal >And just FYI -- most people who reply to him (that would be you) also >get filtered by many of the rest of us. > >GB in NC Oops. You didn't reply to him. You replied to someone else. My bad. Still.... GB in NC >>>FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible >>>thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > GB in NC Thanks for realizing I wasn't responding to the troll. I normally don't respond at all to those type of threads, but that one was getting out of control. I will killfile the Billy Graham want-to-be. Lu in FL > >>FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible > >>thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > GB in NC No problem. Hal > > >>FYI---->Dave is a well-known (and widely ignored/killfiled) bible > > >>thumping webtv troll who loves telling the rest of the world how to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > - Show quoted text - HA HA Dimwit Dave is afraid of his tiny weener. Hey Dave; what do you shine your halo with these days? > On Apr 29, 6:13 pm, "Lu Powell" <zxy...@ohmypapa.net> wrote: Well, I > for one am glad that's over.......Geeeze [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > live from his Throne of Omnipotence > Hal REPLY: Now Hal...you know its not from little ol' me ; its from The Creators Authoirity via the written instructions to all of mankind. Even for folks whos name starts with 'H' and ends in 'L' :) On Apr 30, 5:09 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 29, 6:13 pm, "Lu Powell" <zxy...@ohmypapa.net> wrote: Well, I > > for one am glad that's over.......Geeeze [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Creators Authoirity via the written instructions to all of mankind. > Even for folks whos name starts with 'H' and ends in 'L' :) Dimwit you're utterly mentally ill: Seek help! > Dimwit you're utterly mentally ill: Seek help! And, he's stupid and ignorant, too. I politely asked him some questions about where in his Bible it supported his false claims and what did he come back with? Generalized, sanctimonious, elitist, personal preaching based on his erroneous and quite anal retentive notions. He never even attempted to use his Bible to support his lame, control freak notions. I don't think he even reads the Bible - just spouts what other members of his cult spout. Why? Because nowhere in his Bible does it support his religious sect (I should say "cult") prudish nonsense. More discord in this world can be attributed to Dave and his ilk than just about any other single factor. People who, through ignorance and brainwashing, have decided that their religion is the only religion and it is their job to force their false beliefs on others do irreparable harm to their own cause. To me this seem to be the greatest lie ever told. Claiming to be a "Christian" but abusing the Christ's teachings in their Bible which they claim is the foundation of their religious beliefs. I guess they are just totally incapable of understand the term, " to blaspheme!" They hope to rely on the fact that they have read their Bible a little more than some 'heathen' but, lo and behold, some of us heathens are more capable of reading and understanding their Bible than they are. Even if we don't believe it, we know it. That makes them less qualified to argue their own beliefs with any validity so they do what Dave does. They avoid a serious discussion. They resort to preaching, name-calling and condemning everybody else to their hell. It's utterly absurd. -- Gregory Hall -- Gregory Hall > My wife loves to travel in our RV and she loves nature and being outside. > She's a model. She loves the water but that's a problem for me. She uses too [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > -- > Gregory Hall You SOB, get that picture of my mom off the Internet or I'll......... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.