Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dutch Star Steering

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
>cnc< - 26 Aug 2004 22:22 GMT
We are considering buying a 1999 34' Dutch Star gas RV and we are very
concerned about how well the coach handles on the road at highway
speeds.   Because of its short wheel base, the RV Consumers Group
gives the unit a low grade.  But, we see an awful lot of Dutch Stars
onthe road and we're wondering if we might not get used to the
wandering front end?  Any Dutch Star owners care to give me some idea
of your experience?  Thanks.
Butch Davis - 26 Aug 2004 23:48 GMT
The seering effect takes some getting used to.  But after a few trips you
automatically anticipate what is about to happen and compensate without
giving it a thought.

My 34 DS gasser has about 5200 miles on it and IMO is a dream to drive.

Butch
> We are considering buying a 1999 34' Dutch Star gas RV and we are very
> concerned about how well the coach handles on the road at highway
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wandering front end?  Any Dutch Star owners care to give me some idea
> of your experience?  Thanks.
SteveB - 27 Aug 2004 00:21 GMT
> We are considering buying a 1999 34' Dutch Star gas RV and we are very
> concerned about how well the coach handles on the road at highway
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wandering front end?  Any Dutch Star owners care to give me some idea
> of your experience?  Thanks.

I noticed that the RV Consumers Group rated anything under $300,000 with a
low grade.  Why is that?

Yes, there is some merit to the argument of wheelbase versus length.  This
always seems to come into play in drastic situations where you put the unit
into a 70 mph full skid or evasive maneuver, or recovery from a 70 mph
attempt to leave the roadway, traverse the median for a bit, go into a 360
degree spin, and recover ........ or not ..............., and then say the
coach wasn't able to handle it.

I think one of two things is happening:

1.  There are a lot of happy idiots out there putting hundreds of thousands
of miles on unsafe units, and having fun in the process.
2.  There are a lot of idiots sitting around with too much time on their
hands evaluating units, and not being objective.

or

C.  The industry has a hand in the ratings.

It all depends on what you are going to do with the unit.  For the persons
who full time, and put many many thousands of miles on a unit, the
differences come into play.  For the weekend warrior, and those who might
put 15,000 miles a year on a unit, those differences are imperceptible.  I
own a 1996 Newmar Mountain Aire.  The coach gets very low ratings.  I drive
it about 65 mph, and it handles adequately.  I have yet to really have a
situation where it has been put to the test.  But then, putting anything
that weighs ten tons to a test at 70 mph under panic conditions to my mind,
is a coin flip.

And what did we ever do back in the old days before GCVWRs and Equilizer
hitches when we just hooked up, packed everything in, and went obliviously
on vacation, and returned home safely?

Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.