Car Forum / Saab Cars / October 2004
SAAB INFO WEBSITE
|
|
Thread rating:  |
James Onesios - 20 Oct 2004 02:52 GMT If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about Saabs, check www.saabnet.com It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
Goran Larsson - 20 Oct 2004 09:48 GMT > If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabnet.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. Please be aware that many answers posted in those bulletin boards are incorrect and are never corrected. They are never corrected because the moderation policies on that site has made several posters, with the correct answers, stop posting.
 Signature G?ran Larsson http://www.mitt-eget.com/saab/
Craig's C900 Workshop - 24 Oct 2004 12:43 GMT >> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com >> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
>Please be aware that many answers posted in those bulletin boards are >incorrect and are never corrected. They are never corrected because the >moderation policies on that site has made several posters, with the >correct answers, stop posting. While Saabnet.com is a great concept, the bulletin boards are censored and if you don't follow Scott's strict 'blinkering' board posting rules he blocks you from posting. I was blocked from posting on Saabnet because I set up my C900 Workshop website which contains online web-based forums, mailing lists, yahoo groups, etc. and stacks of reference material links which goes against 'Saabnet.com bulletin board posting policy', and the few posts I was able to get into the Saabnet.com C900 bulletin board all contained a link to my own website (since Scott's boards provide the facility to add a web link, etc. with each posting).
That's fine as it's Scott's call as to what he does with his site, but I don't condone the approach as he is basically forcing people to use his site and not go to alternatives (and there are plenty more besides the site I have set up).
The emails I exchanged with Scott were fairly terse and the tone seemed to be one of 'well if you do something which competes with Saabnet you will be blocked from posting'. If I was directly 'competing' I'd try to steal his commercial advertisers but I have a rule of not having any commercial advertising connected to my C900 Workshop site as the site is open to *everyone* with an interest in C900's, not just those people who Scott thinks are not trying to usurp visitors to his site.
All that aside, the best way to initially track down information for something you're not sure about is via Google and by asking here in this newsgroup. I've discovered a lot of other sites with chatrooms, bulletin boards, online forums, etc. which Saabnet doesn't have any info about through searching via Google for info on various Saab-related topics, usually with fairly good results. Some of those I've added to the links page on my C900 Workshop site, and almost all I have invited to join the Saab C900 Webring that I set up (though almost none have accepted the invitations - once again that's up to each website owner to decide to join or not).
Regards,
Craig.
PS. The other thing which bothers me about Saabnet is that Scott has a great photo gallery system going, but for the time I've known about his site he hasn't been accepting any new image submissions! No idea why. I just accept it and save up the pics I take of my Saab's and the work I'm doing on them for a time in the near future when I start creating my own Saab image galleries and (hopefully) get a public web-based Saab C900 pic gallery started.
 Signature Craig's Saab Page --> http://lios.apana.org.au/~c900 Sydney, NSW Australia Craig's C900 Workshop -- For all Saab 'Classic' 900 Enthusiasts world-wide! Website --> http://www.saab900classic.net Email --> c900@lios.apana.org.au Come and explore our site, and check out our web-forums, mailing list, etc.
Henrik B. - 24 Oct 2004 15:40 GMT > While Saabnet.com is a great concept, the bulletin boards are censored and > if you don't follow Scott's strict 'blinkering' board posting rules he [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > great > photo gallery system going, but for the time I've known about his site he In general, Scott's a fool.
Cheers!
Grunff - 20 Oct 2004 10:01 GMT James Onesios wrote:
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabnet.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. Scott's got you pimping for him, has he?
 Signature Grunff
Sleeker GT Phwoar - 20 Oct 2004 10:10 GMT > If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabnet.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban should be extended ;)
 Signature "Sorry Sir, the meatballs are Orf" The poster formerly known as Skodapilot. http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 15:17 GMT
> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it > conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster > be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban > should be extended ;) Can we ban everyone in the same subnet as his newshost, just to be sure?
Henrik B. - 20 Oct 2004 15:41 GMT >> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it >> conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster >> be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban >> should be extended ;) > > Can we ban everyone in the same subnet as his newshost, just to be sure? *LOL*
Cheers!
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 18:26 GMT >> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com >> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it > conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster > be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban > should be extended ;) Hey bud! How's the new weapon of mass destruction? I must confess to having looked at a Nissan Silvia recently - one of the older twin turbo models. It was an auto though, but would still have been fun. I looked at one about four years ago, but bought a SAAB instead ... Something about gold wheels not going down too well for a guy like me in a place like I live ...
Speaking of BBs - there are several others out there, going by names as diverse as 900 Aero, SAAB Central, SAAB Scene, UK SAABs, etc. I find if I want to know something quickly and want a correct answer (short of rining my excellent mechanics, of course), I know where to make my post. If I want to share that advice, I can go to BBs :)
Paul
1989 900 Turbo S http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Kristian Steve Jensen - 21 Oct 2004 20:32 GMT > in article MPG.1be03bd3520b907a98a73a@news.individual.net, Sleeker GT > Phwoar [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > four years ago, but bought a SAAB instead ... Something about gold wheels > not going down too well for a guy like me in a place like I live ... Nissan Silvia twin turbo with gold wheels? You (or the guy who put it together if such a thing indeed exists) are mixing at least three different cars here.
Kristian
Nobody In Particular - 20 Oct 2004 20:00 GMT I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives. For the most part this message would disappear from most news servers within a week. As long as we continue to reply to this thread, the origional message will stay alive.
Freedom of speach is a great freedom that comes with the ultimate power to ignore the speaker. I would rather have the freedom of speach and have to deal with a few posts that irritate me, as opposed to being censored.
Freedom of speach means you must give your opponent the opportunity to express his views. If you're not willing to do that, the you need to keep quiet too.
My 2 cents worth.
NIP
"Drive a liberal crazy, work hard and be happy!"
>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban >should be extended ;) Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 20:09 GMT > I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives. For > the most part this message would disappear from most news servers > within a week. As long as we continue to reply to this thread, the > origional message will stay alive. It's a parody of the fact that the saabnet guy has a habit of bannination of people for no readily apparent reason. More than a couple of people here used to contribute a bunch over there, did something (or didn't do something) he didn't like, and he not only blocked their IP, but he removed all of their historical posts from the site. Further, he's not real good and/or careful at how to banninate by IP, because whole ISPs have been blocked in the past due to one person being on his sh.t-list.
Granted, he _does_ own the server and it's his choice to do so, but when I learned of that behavior I decided to spend my efforts and time here, where the whims of a dictatorial arbitrary decision-making process aren't going to erase what I have written. No point in spending effort on something that someone else might choose to erase for real or imagined offenses.
Dave Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 20:16 GMT > I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives. For > the most part this message would disappear from most news servers [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > express his views. If you're not willing to do that, the you need to > keep quiet too. Indeed! The pleasure of having freedom to speak inherently contains the responsibility not to deny others their right to speak back. The guy in question owns his website and chooses to allow other people onto it - if you go to someone's barbeque, he has a right to kick you out. This guy, however, also archives *my* words - he's running a public firework display and I find that quite distasteful that he kicks people out without reason or explanantion.
Other BBs ... Oh, and Usenet, have a solid sense of internationalism and are quite capable of moderating themselves by good behaviour and a public telling off when people step over the line. I have seen someone breech one T&C quite badly on one BB, but he apologised and the affected people accepted the apology. He was allowed to stay on the board (after several affected people were contacted) ... He wasn't outright banned, but a level headed, adult consensus was reached. He was a "moderator" too and should have known better, but drink and high spirits can get the better of us all some times!!!
On a wider note, I find it quite uplifting that people from all over the world with different languages, cultures, experiences and expectations can come together on a BB or Usenet and discuss matters of common interest. I'm ashamed that as singular nations we cannot seem to do that.
Paul
Nobody In Particular - 20 Oct 2004 21:25 GMT Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.
I blame the media for causing a split in our country. They fuel the fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that smells worse than the original story.
When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those reporting the news. I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better tomorrow than they were today. I refuse to swing my vote to a candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen.
This election is just plain nasty. You want to talk about disenfranchised, I hate turning on the TV because it's one side bad mouthing the other - they are both guilty! It's unfortunate that we have no real "choice" to base our vote on. It's either the status quo or vote for a change, which is not much better than the status quo! I want to vote FOR someone not AGAINST someone!
People who are basing their vote entirely along party lines, based on reports from the one sided media, or a hate filled statement by an actor, they are uninformed voters. Voters owe it to themselves to research the truth, never trust what you read in the newspaper or see on TV, verify it before you claim it's true.
I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent.
I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.
>> I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives. For >> the most part this message would disappear from most news servers [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > >Paul Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 21:28 GMT > Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment. Yay.
> I blame the media for causing a split in our country. They fuel the > fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in > the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that > smells worse than the original story. Er, What? It's a case of a guy being too heavy-handed in his editorial process, nothing more.
> When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those > reporting the news. I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better > tomorrow than they were today. I refuse to swing my vote to a > candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen. Um, OK, so does that mean you'll be on Saabnet or here, or both, or neither?
> This election is just plain nasty. Yup. But Kerry lies too much like Clinton did, so I'm voting against him. Particularly since his lies on a topic I feel is important are so similar to Clinton's lies on the same topic.
> I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent. Understood.
> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door. Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please? I have a driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice dark metallic blue. In our part of the world we sit on the left side while driving, if that helps.
Dave Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 21:52 GMT
>> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door. > > Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please? I have a > driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice > dark metallic blue. In our part of the world we sit on the left side > while driving, if that helps. He's one of you lot, I'm sure of that! Unless we're having an election and I missed it? :)
Paul
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 21:56 GMT > >>> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door. >> >> Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please? I have a >> driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice >> dark metallic blue.
> He's one of you lot, I'm sure of that! > Unless we're having an election and I missed it? :) Wot, you mean you Brits have a different gummint than we do? First you corrupt the English language, and now you won't even participate in the Democratic process? Why, in my day.... (grumble mumble)
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 22:04 GMT > gummint I'm still waiting for dictionary.com to send me that as my word for the day via RSS! It sounds to be of some Erin extraction - perhaps you should be voting for the other guy :)
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 22:13 GMT >> gummint > > I'm still waiting for dictionary.com to send me that as my word for the day > via RSS! It sounds to be of some Erin extraction - perhaps you should be > voting for the other guy :) The connotation is of a semi-literate anti-government back woods type. Not sure of the linguistic origins, but it sounds southern-US'ish when spoken. Think hillbilly, if that means anything at all.
Say, how's the Queen? Tell ER I said "hey" next time you see her, wouldja?
Thanks awfully, Dave
Nobody In Particular - 21 Oct 2004 14:22 GMT Dave ...
Take I94 into I65 and go all the way to the end. Go west from there about 35 miles and you're where I am!
While we may not always drive in the right lane, we do still sit on the left hand side of the car!!
Contact me at jwmort(at)yahoo.com and we'll discuss the door.
Many thanks!
I should be placed in a drug induced coma until Jan 2005 - maybe all this will be over by then!
Thank God for compact disk players and Sirrus Radio!
NIP
>> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment. > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > >Dave Hinz Dave Hinz - 21 Oct 2004 15:34 GMT > Dave ... > > Take I94 into I65 and go all the way to the end. Go west from there > about 35 miles and you're where I am! While I'm only 6 miles from I-94, I am a bit far from I-65 in the east/west direction. I have a friend lives out in Washington state - the directions to their house from mine are "Take I-94 west, get off at exit (name), go right, through two stoplights, and I'm the second house on the left". No problem, but it's a 3 day drive or so to get there. Not much danger of getting lost...
> Contact me at jwmort(at)yahoo.com and we'll discuss the door. You've got mail!
Dave
hippo - 23 Oct 2004 06:42 GMT <I should be placed in a drug induced coma until Jan 2005 - maybe all this will be over by then!>
Maybe place both the candidates in a DIC until 2008 and let Michael Moore see out his current term uninterrupted. Then again, we've just finished our elections. The incumbents are back in and the sore losers are holding mass public executions of each other... Cheers from Oz.
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 21:50 GMT > Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment. > > I blame the media for causing a split in our country. They fuel the > fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in > the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that > smells worse than the original story. Someone will always make a living from misunderstanding and posing an extreme bias. I thought the UK's tabloid press what the "daddy" of that game!
> When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those > reporting the news. I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better > tomorrow than they were today. I refuse to swing my vote to a > candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen. Hmm ... vote? Okay, you're wasting your vote and have no right to speak about anything if you don't vote, but your vote can only be for one of two things ... The same as you've got, or like you had before but are now like those you've got now a few years ago! I'm a Brit, BTW :) I remember the Labour party (your Democrats) back in 1979 when we had no fuel, no refuse collection, no open schools ... But if we'd known what the Tories were going to do over the following 20 years, we would've thought twice. Now, our Labour party are just like the Tories were. Where's the choice? We now only seem to have extreme nationalism as our "choice" and I live in one of our BNP's heartlands!!! Google the BBC website for opinion on the BNP! Okay, so my house is still worth something, but it's a high social price to pay and I cannot see that as a good thing in the long term. I'll avoid any conversation about our Muslim friends, given the current climate of misunderstanding and fear. I do hope that one sorts itself out soon, perhaps devoid of the oil debate!
> This election is just plain nasty. You want to talk about > disenfranchised, I hate turning on the TV because it's one side bad > mouthing the other - they are both guilty! It's unfortunate that we > have no real "choice" to base our vote on. It's either the status quo > or vote for a change, which is not much better than the status quo! I > want to vote FOR someone not AGAINST someone! When we voted the Tories out (after 20 years - they're like your Republicans, in a way) and the Labour party in, we were voting for something. Wales and Scotland had *no* Tory wards, which shows the extent of the desire for a change. We (as the UK) sent a very positive message to the Tories that we had had enough. Unfortunately, they have not become anything like as solid an opposition that our current ruling party are. I cannot see the Liberals (I'm not sure what they're like your side of the "pond") as any kind of answer, but perhaps a three way split here might be better than the old two way choice we had before?
> People who are basing their vote entirely along party lines, based on > reports from the one sided media, or a hate filled statement by an > actor, they are uninformed voters. Voters owe it to themselves to > research the truth, never trust what you read in the newspaper or see > on TV, verify it before you claim it's true. Yes, research the truth, but you've still no choice!!! Take heart, neither do we! I would encourage you to think for yourself and perhaps point you at one of your better countrymen; Noam Chomsky. I like that guy - he's an adept thinker and one who can teach you to think more about yourself and your circumstances, making your immediate "place" a better place. I would be inclined to boycott voting, but then I have no voice. It's quite a conundrum, isn't it?
> I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent. No need to apologise - we're all intelligent people here. We do drive SAABs, afterall :)
> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door. Ah! Back to SAABs - me too, except for the door, but my driver's side is not the same side as yours ... Swap ya?
Paul
1989 900 Turbo S http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Nobody In Particular - 21 Oct 2004 15:03 GMT Paul,
I fully understand what you are referring to. I grew up in (West) Germany and have lived in Europe as an adult for 7 years before coming back to the US to tend to family matters. I also spent some time in the Middle East - when it was "friendly"!
While in Europe we used to get Sky News and the BBC - basically our only "real" source of English news. Our newspaper was the International Herald Tribune and the NY Times (when we could get it). Man, did we find our views leaning towards the left as a result!
I considered myself a conservative, while others would consider me more moderate. I consider myself a "global thinker" with regards to the knowledge that the sun does not rise and fall in the US, there are other nations that play a hand in the way things are done in the world.
I'm not a real big fan of the UN. I feel they are ineffective as a police force because of politics. The UN is in places that need not be and not in places they should. The UN needs to act in the Sudan. If Cyprus needs a UN force because of the Greek-Turk battles, why hasn't the UN gone into Gaza and the West Bank? The same thing has happened in both places, what is the difference?
I'm still undecided with regards to the EU. There is something to be said for a political and economic union that transcends borders and idiology - not to mention hatred from two World Wars. I'll wait and see what the EU does with Turkey and how they will support that failed economy.
Cheers!
>> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment. >> [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] >1989 900 Turbo S >http://saab.go.dyndns.org/ SuoTimo - 20 Oct 2004 12:04 GMT And really has the freedom of speach?
SuoTimo
James Onesios wrote:
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabnet.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. Henrik B. - 20 Oct 2004 14:57 GMT "James Onesios" <onesios@worldnet.att.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:vxjdd.724875$Gx4.128097@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabxxx.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. That site is a load of rubbish.......people getting banned for no reason what-so-ever.....Scott's an amateur!
Cheers!
murphwiz - 20 Oct 2004 19:39 GMT > If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > Saabs, check www.saabnet.com > It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. The site is a crock of sh.t. Hard to navigate, useless. And you will get banned for no apparent reason.
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 19:41 GMT >> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com >> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
> Hard to navigate, useless. > And you will get banned for no apparent reason. You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect IP addresses proactively.
Dave "I'm just saying...and not caring..." Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 19:56 GMT >>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect > IP addresses proactively. Cool ... Mine is 64.139.33.19 - ban that :) ;) I recognise a couple of names from *other* BBs who are refugees from SAABnet.
Paul
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 19:58 GMT
>> You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect >> IP addresses proactively.
> Cool ... Mine is 64.139.33.19 - ban that :) ;) OK, show of hands, who else just did a lookup on that IP?
Dave "/raises hand" Hinz
murphwiz - 20 Oct 2004 21:51 GMT > >> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about > >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect > IP addresses proactively. I've been banned numerous times already.. I do it for fun now.
Craig Ian Dewick - 29 Oct 2004 10:54 GMT >If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >Saabs, check www.saabnet.com >It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board. Ahoy mateys we've found a Saabnet stooge! 8-)
The *concept* that Saabnet embodies is very good, but the *implementation* of that concept is extremely bad and gives the Saab enthusiast community a very bad reputation amongst the ranks of prestige vehicle owners. The primary reason is due to Scott's censorship (and blocking) of posts and his posting policies in general.
The online forums on my C900 Workshop site (and all the other alternative Saab online forum sites I have explored) have none of that superfluous shite as I believe, as do most other site owners running forums for Saab enthusists, that *everyone* should be freely able to use online forums for genuine discussions about Saab-related issues without any censorship of their posts even if a poster is the owner of an alternative site, forum, etc. to one that might already exist on a particular site.
Fortunately, there are plenty of sites like mine that have been set up to counter the negative image created by Saabnet. I've got one of the alternative sites as most of you would know by now, but there are others which you'll find if you do a search through google. Most of the Saab owners clubs (such as SCCA here in Australia) have online forums too.
If you want global exposure you'll get a fairer hearing in this newsgroup than you will on Saabnet. If you would like a more focused audience try online forums, mailing lists, yahoo groups, etc. These things exist at my site but there are plenty of other sites offering similar things.
My site is "http://www.saab900classic.net" for those who would like to check it out. Mine is nowhere near the most extensive but it's the only one actively supporting Saab C900 enthusiasts in Australia and New Zealand! 8-)
Regards,
Craig.
PS. Today I created a new mailing list for Saab NG900 enthusiasts as a sister mailing list to the one I'm already running for Saab C900 enthusists.
The NG900 list is at "http://lios.apana.org.au/mailman/listinfo/saab_ng900" if anyone wishes to subscribe to it and kick it off. I am not an NG900 owner so I am happy to consider someone who is, and is passionate about their car(s) and having an independent list for NG900's, to offer to become an alternative list administrator. I'd prefer someone in Australia or NZ to keep the local focus but like the web-based forums, the list is open to everyone who has an interest in NG900's.
 Signature Craig Dewick - craig@circlet.apana.org.au - Founder/maintainer of the SunShack at www.sunshack.org - Operator of Jedi (an APANA Sydney PoP) - please visit www.jedi.apana.org.au or www.sydney.apana.org.au for more detailed information Lover of SpamAssassin - high quality open-source spam killing for the masses!
Fred W. - 29 Oct 2004 15:46 GMT >>If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about >>Saabs, check www.saabnet.com [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > his > posting policies in general. <<snip a bunch of self promotions>>
While the forums at saabnet may be censored, the saabnet site is still the single best collection of SAAB information on the web that I am aware of. Your site may be good for C900 enthusiasts, Craig. I cannot say since I am not one. OTOH, I have used the saabnet site for getting information about 9000's and NG900's for years and never once felt the need to post to the fora there.
I have also successfully advertised and sold 2 cars through the Classifieds section there at a total cost to me of $50. I suppose I could have sold the cars at zero cost on some other site or via spamming newsgroups, but the amount of traffic at the saabnet site got the cars sold quickly and at the prices I wanted.
I feel for those people who have been rebuffed by the saabnet owner/censor, but that does not mean that the site is not a valuable resource or that anyone who thinks that it is one is a "stooge."
Otherwise, better paint me a stooge...
-Fred W
|
|
|