Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Saab Cars / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SAAB INFO WEBSITE

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James  Onesios - 20 Oct 2004 02:52 GMT
If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
Goran Larsson - 20 Oct 2004 09:48 GMT
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

Please be aware that many answers posted in those bulletin boards are
incorrect and are never corrected. They are never corrected because the
moderation policies on that site has made several posters, with the
correct answers, stop posting.

Signature

G?ran Larsson     http://www.mitt-eget.com/saab/

Craig's C900 Workshop - 24 Oct 2004 12:43 GMT
>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
>> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

>Please be aware that many answers posted in those bulletin boards are
>incorrect and are never corrected. They are never corrected because the
>moderation policies on that site has made several posters, with the
>correct answers, stop posting.

While Saabnet.com is a great concept, the bulletin boards are censored and
if you don't follow Scott's strict 'blinkering' board posting rules he
blocks you from posting. I was blocked from posting on Saabnet because I set
up my C900 Workshop website which contains online web-based forums, mailing
lists, yahoo groups, etc. and stacks of reference material links which goes
against 'Saabnet.com bulletin board posting policy', and the few posts I was
able to get into the Saabnet.com C900 bulletin board all contained a link to
my own website (since Scott's boards provide the facility to add a web link,
etc. with each posting).

That's fine as it's Scott's call as to what he does with his site, but I
don't condone the approach as he is basically forcing people to use his site
and not go to alternatives (and there are plenty more besides the site I
have set up).

The emails I exchanged with Scott were fairly terse and the tone seemed to
be one of 'well if you do something which competes with Saabnet you will be
blocked from posting'. If I was directly 'competing' I'd try to steal his
commercial advertisers but I have a rule of not having any commercial
advertising connected to my C900 Workshop site as the site is open to
*everyone* with an interest in C900's, not just those people who Scott
thinks are not trying to usurp visitors to his site.

All that aside, the best way to initially track down information for
something you're not sure about is via Google and by asking here in this
newsgroup. I've discovered a lot of other sites with chatrooms, bulletin
boards, online forums, etc. which Saabnet doesn't have any info about
through searching via Google for info on various Saab-related topics,
usually with fairly good results. Some of those I've added to the links page
on my C900 Workshop site, and almost all I have invited to join the Saab
C900 Webring that I set up (though almost none have accepted the invitations
- once again that's up to each website owner to decide to join or not).

Regards,

Craig.

PS. The other thing which bothers me about Saabnet is that Scott has a great
photo gallery system going, but for the time I've known about his site he
hasn't been accepting any new image submissions! No idea why. I just accept
it and save up the pics I take of my Saab's and the work I'm doing on them
for a time in the near future when I start creating my own Saab image
galleries and (hopefully) get a public web-based Saab C900 pic gallery
started.

Signature

Craig's Saab Page --> http://lios.apana.org.au/~c900      Sydney, NSW Australia
 Craig's C900 Workshop -- For all Saab 'Classic' 900 Enthusiasts world-wide!
Website --> http://www.saab900classic.net    Email --> c900@lios.apana.org.au
 Come and explore our site, and check out our web-forums, mailing list, etc.

Henrik B. - 24 Oct 2004 15:40 GMT
> While Saabnet.com is a great concept, the bulletin boards are censored and
> if you don't follow Scott's strict 'blinkering' board posting rules he
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> great
> photo gallery system going, but for the time I've known about his site he

In general, Scott's a fool.

Cheers!
Grunff - 20 Oct 2004 10:01 GMT
James Onesios wrote:
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

Scott's got you pimping for him, has he?

Signature

Grunff

Sleeker GT Phwoar - 20 Oct 2004 10:10 GMT
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it
conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster
be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban
should be extended ;)
Signature

"Sorry Sir, the meatballs are Orf"
The poster formerly known as Skodapilot.
http://www.bouncing-czechs.com

Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 15:17 GMT

> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it
> conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster
> be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban
> should be extended ;)

Can we ban everyone in the same subnet as his newshost, just to be sure?
Henrik B. - 20 Oct 2004 15:41 GMT
>> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it
>> conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster
>> be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban
>> should be extended ;)
>
> Can we ban everyone in the same subnet as his newshost, just to be sure?

*LOL*

Cheers!
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 18:26 GMT
>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
>> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to request that this be removed as it
> conflicts with omnipotent infalability of this newsgroup, and the poster
> be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban
> should be extended ;)

Hey bud! How's the new weapon of mass destruction? I must confess to having
looked at a Nissan Silvia recently - one of the older twin turbo models. It
was an auto though, but would still have been fun. I looked at one about
four years ago, but bought a SAAB instead ... Something about gold wheels
not going down too well for a guy like me in a place like I live ...

Speaking of BBs - there are several others out there, going by names as
diverse as 900 Aero, SAAB Central, SAAB Scene, UK SAABs, etc. I find if I
want to know something quickly and want a correct answer (short of rining my
excellent mechanics, of course), I know where to make my post. If I want to
share that advice, I can go to BBs :)

Paul

1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Kristian Steve Jensen - 21 Oct 2004 20:32 GMT
> in article MPG.1be03bd3520b907a98a73a@news.individual.net, Sleeker GT
> Phwoar
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> four years ago, but bought a SAAB instead ... Something about gold wheels
> not going down too well for a guy like me in a place like I live ...

Nissan Silvia twin turbo with gold wheels? You (or the guy who put it
together if such a thing indeed exists) are mixing at least three different
cars here.

Kristian
Nobody In Particular - 20 Oct 2004 20:00 GMT
I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives.  For
the most part this message would disappear from most news servers
within a week.  As long as we continue to reply to this thread, the
origional message will stay alive.

Freedom of speach is a great freedom that comes with the ultimate
power to ignore the speaker.  I would rather have the freedom of
speach and have to deal with a few posts that irritate me, as opposed
to being censored.

Freedom of speach means you must give your opponent the opportunity to
express his views.  If you're not willing to do that, the you need to
keep quiet too.

My 2 cents worth.

NIP

"Drive a liberal crazy, work hard and be happy!"

>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>be banned for all eternity, and if he appeals or complains the ban
>should be extended ;)
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 20:09 GMT
> I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives.  For
> the most part this message would disappear from most news servers
> within a week.  As long as we continue to reply to this thread, the
> origional message will stay alive.

It's a parody of the fact that the saabnet guy has a habit of bannination
of people for no readily apparent reason.  More than a couple of people here
used to contribute a  bunch over there, did something (or didn't do
something) he didn't like, and he not only blocked their IP, but he
removed all of their historical posts from the site.  Further, he's not
real good and/or careful at how to banninate by IP, because whole ISPs
have been blocked in the past due to one person being on his sh.t-list.

Granted, he _does_ own the server and it's his choice to do so, but when
I learned of that behavior I decided to spend my efforts and time here,
where the whims of a dictatorial arbitrary decision-making process aren't
going to erase what I have written.  No point in spending effort on
something that someone else might choose to erase for real or imagined
offenses.

Dave Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 20:16 GMT
> I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives.  For
> the most part this message would disappear from most news servers
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> express his views.  If you're not willing to do that, the you need to
> keep quiet too.

Indeed! The pleasure of having freedom to speak inherently contains the
responsibility not to deny others their right to speak back. The guy in
question owns his website and chooses to allow other people onto it - if you
go to someone's barbeque, he has a right to kick you out. This guy, however,
also archives *my* words - he's running a public firework display and I find
that quite distasteful that he kicks people out without reason or
explanantion.

Other BBs ... Oh, and Usenet, have a solid sense of internationalism and are
quite capable of moderating themselves by good behaviour and a public
telling off when people step over the line. I have seen someone breech one
T&C quite badly on one BB, but he apologised and the affected people
accepted the apology. He was allowed to stay on the board (after several
affected people were contacted) ... He wasn't outright banned, but a level
headed, adult consensus was reached. He was a "moderator" too and should
have known better, but drink and high spirits can get the better of us all
some times!!!

On a wider note, I find it quite uplifting that people from all over the
world with different languages, cultures, experiences and expectations can
come together on a BB or Usenet and discuss matters of common interest. I'm
ashamed that as singular nations we cannot seem to do that.

Paul
Nobody In Particular - 20 Oct 2004 21:25 GMT
Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.

I blame the media for causing a split in our country.  They fuel the
fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in
the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that
smells worse than the original story.

When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those
reporting the news.  I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better
tomorrow than they were today.  I refuse to swing my vote to a
candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen.

This election is just plain nasty.  You want to talk about
disenfranchised, I hate turning on the TV because it's one side bad
mouthing the other - they are both guilty!  It's unfortunate that we
have no real "choice" to base our vote on.  It's either the status quo
or vote for a change, which is not much better than the status quo!  I
want to vote FOR someone not AGAINST someone!

People who are basing their vote entirely along party lines, based on
reports from the one sided media, or a hate filled statement by an
actor, they are uninformed voters.  Voters owe it to themselves to
research the truth, never trust what you read in the newspaper or see
on TV, verify it before you claim it's true.

I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent.

I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.

>> I doubt you will be able to get this removed from the archives.  For
>> the most part this message would disappear from most news servers
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>Paul
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 21:28 GMT
> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.

Yay.

> I blame the media for causing a split in our country.  They fuel the
> fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in
> the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that
> smells worse than the original story.

Er, What?  It's a case of a guy being too heavy-handed in his editorial
process, nothing more.

> When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those
> reporting the news.  I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better
> tomorrow than they were today.  I refuse to swing my vote to a
> candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen.

Um, OK, so does that mean you'll be on Saabnet or here, or both, or neither?

> This election is just plain nasty.  

Yup.  But Kerry lies too much like Clinton did, so I'm voting against
him.  Particularly since his lies on a topic I feel is important are
so similar to Clinton's lies on the same topic.

> I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent.

Understood.

> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.

Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please?  I have a
driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice
dark metallic blue.  In our part of the world we sit on the left side
while driving, if that helps.

Dave Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 21:52 GMT

>> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.
>
> Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please?  I have a
> driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice
> dark metallic blue.  In our part of the world we sit on the left side
> while driving, if that helps.

He's one of you lot, I'm sure of that!
Unless we're having an election and I missed it? :)

Paul
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 21:56 GMT
>  
>>> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.
>>
>> Which side of the car do you sit in while driving, please?  I have a
>> driver's door for a c900 in my barn in Wisconsin, good shape, that nice
>> dark metallic blue.  

> He's one of you lot, I'm sure of that!
> Unless we're having an election and I missed it? :)

Wot, you mean you Brits have a different gummint than we do?  First you
corrupt the English language, and now you won't even participate in the
Democratic process?  Why, in my day.... (grumble mumble)
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 22:04 GMT
> gummint

I'm still waiting for dictionary.com to send me that as my word for the day
via RSS! It sounds to be of some Erin extraction - perhaps you should be
voting for the other guy :)
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 22:13 GMT
>> gummint
>
> I'm still waiting for dictionary.com to send me that as my word for the day
> via RSS! It sounds to be of some Erin extraction - perhaps you should be
> voting for the other guy :)

The connotation is of a semi-literate anti-government back woods type.
Not sure of the linguistic origins, but it sounds southern-US'ish
when spoken.  Think hillbilly, if that means anything at all.

Say, how's the Queen?  Tell ER I said "hey" next time you see her, wouldja?

Thanks awfully,
Dave
Nobody In Particular - 21 Oct 2004 14:22 GMT
Dave ...

Take I94 into I65 and go all the way to the end.  Go west from there
about 35 miles and you're where I am!

While we may not always drive in the right lane, we do still sit on
the left hand side of the car!!

Contact me at jwmort(at)yahoo.com and we'll discuss the door.

Many thanks!

I should be placed in a drug induced coma until Jan 2005 - maybe all
this will be over by then!  

Thank God for compact disk players and Sirrus Radio!

NIP

>> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>Dave Hinz
Dave Hinz - 21 Oct 2004 15:34 GMT
> Dave ...
>
> Take I94 into I65 and go all the way to the end.  Go west from there
> about 35 miles and you're where I am!

While I'm only 6 miles from I-94, I am a bit far from I-65 in the east/west
direction.  I have a friend lives out in Washington state - the directions
to their house from mine are "Take I-94 west, get off at exit (name),
go right, through two stoplights, and I'm the second house on the left".
No problem, but it's a 3 day drive or so to get there.  Not much danger
of getting lost...

> Contact me at jwmort(at)yahoo.com and we'll discuss the door.

You've got mail!

Dave
hippo - 23 Oct 2004 06:42 GMT
<I should be placed in a drug induced coma until Jan 2005 - maybe all this
will be over by then!>

Maybe place both the candidates in a DIC until 2008 and let Michael Moore
see out his current term uninterrupted. Then again, we've just finished
our elections. The incumbents are back in and the sore losers are holding
mass public executions of each other... Cheers from Oz.
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 21:50 GMT
> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.
>
> I blame the media for causing a split in our country.  They fuel the
> fire that burns brightly and when they are caught with their hands in
> the cookie jar, they first deny it, then apologize in a manner that
> smells worse than the original story.

Someone will always make a living from misunderstanding and posing an
extreme bias. I thought the UK's tabloid press what the "daddy" of that
game!

> When all you see is bad news, you need to suspect the bias of those
> reporting the news.  I'm an optimist, I believe things will be better
> tomorrow than they were today.  I refuse to swing my vote to a
> candidate who has a platform based on fear and what "might" happen.

Hmm ... vote? Okay, you're wasting your vote and have no right to speak
about anything if you don't vote, but your vote can only be for one of two
things ... The same as you've got, or like you had before but are now like
those you've got now a few years ago! I'm a Brit, BTW :) I remember the
Labour party (your Democrats) back in 1979 when we had no fuel, no refuse
collection, no open schools ... But if we'd known what the Tories were going
to do over the following 20 years, we would've thought twice. Now, our
Labour party are just like the Tories were. Where's the choice? We now only
seem to have extreme nationalism as our "choice" and I live in one of our
BNP's heartlands!!! Google the BBC website for opinion on the BNP! Okay, so
my house is still worth something, but it's a high social price to pay and I
cannot see that as a good thing in the long term. I'll avoid any
conversation about our Muslim friends, given the current climate of
misunderstanding and fear. I do hope that one sorts itself out soon, perhaps
devoid of the oil debate!

> This election is just plain nasty.  You want to talk about
> disenfranchised, I hate turning on the TV because it's one side bad
> mouthing the other - they are both guilty!  It's unfortunate that we
> have no real "choice" to base our vote on.  It's either the status quo
> or vote for a change, which is not much better than the status quo!  I
> want to vote FOR someone not AGAINST someone!

When we voted the Tories out (after 20 years - they're like your
Republicans, in a way) and the Labour party in, we were voting for
something. Wales and Scotland had *no* Tory wards, which shows the extent of
the desire for a change. We (as the UK) sent a very positive message to the
Tories that we had had enough. Unfortunately, they have not become anything
like as solid an opposition that our current ruling party are. I cannot see
the Liberals (I'm not sure what they're like your side of the "pond") as any
kind of answer, but perhaps a three way split here might be better than the
old two way choice we had before?

> People who are basing their vote entirely along party lines, based on
> reports from the one sided media, or a hate filled statement by an
> actor, they are uninformed voters.  Voters owe it to themselves to
> research the truth, never trust what you read in the newspaper or see
> on TV, verify it before you claim it's true.

Yes, research the truth, but you've still no choice!!! Take heart, neither
do we! I would encourage you to think for yourself and perhaps point you at
one of your better countrymen; Noam Chomsky. I like that guy - he's an adept
thinker and one who can teach you to think more about yourself and your
circumstances, making your immediate "place" a better place. I would be
inclined to boycott voting, but then I have no voice. It's quite a
conundrum, isn't it?

> I'll step off the soapbox now - sorry group, I needed to vent.

No need to apologise - we're all intelligent people here. We do drive SAABs,
afterall :)

> I'm still looking for a front driver's side fender and driver's door.

Ah! Back to SAABs - me too, except for the door, but my driver's side is not
the same side as yours ... Swap ya?

Paul

1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Nobody In Particular - 21 Oct 2004 15:03 GMT
Paul,

I fully understand what you are referring to.  I grew up in (West)
Germany and have lived in Europe as an adult for 7 years before coming
back to the US to tend to family matters.  I also spent some time in
the Middle East - when it was "friendly"!

While in Europe we used to get Sky News and the BBC - basically our
only "real" source of English news.  Our newspaper was the
International Herald Tribune and the NY Times (when we could get it).
Man, did we find our views leaning towards the left as a result!

I considered myself a conservative, while others would consider me
more moderate.  I consider myself a "global thinker" with regards to
the knowledge that the sun does not rise and fall in the US, there are
other nations that play a hand in the way things are done in the
world.

I'm not a real big fan of the UN.  I feel they are ineffective as a
police force because of politics.  The UN is in places that need not
be and not in places they should.  The UN needs to act in the Sudan.
If Cyprus needs a UN force because of the Greek-Turk battles, why
hasn't the UN gone into Gaza and the West Bank?  The same thing has
happened in both places, what is the difference?

I'm still undecided with regards to the EU.  There is something to be
said for a political and economic union that transcends borders and
idiology - not to mention hatred from two World Wars.  I'll wait and
see what the EU does with Turkey and how they will support that failed
economy.

Cheers!

>> Well said and I now understand the "banned" comment.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>1989 900 Turbo S
>http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
SuoTimo - 20 Oct 2004 12:04 GMT
And really has the freedom of speach?

SuoTimo

James Onesios wrote:

> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.
Henrik B. - 20 Oct 2004 14:57 GMT
"James Onesios" <onesios@worldnet.att.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:vxjdd.724875$Gx4.128097@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabxxx.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

That site is a load of rubbish.......people getting banned for no reason
what-so-ever.....Scott's an amateur!

Cheers!
murphwiz - 20 Oct 2004 19:39 GMT
> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

The site is a crock of sh.t.
Hard to navigate, useless.
And you will get banned for no apparent reason.
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 19:41 GMT
>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
>> It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

> Hard to navigate, useless.
> And you will get banned for no apparent reason.

You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect
IP addresses proactively.

Dave "I'm just saying...and not caring..." Hinz
Paul Halliday - 20 Oct 2004 19:56 GMT
>>> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>>> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect
> IP addresses proactively.

Cool ... Mine is 64.139.33.19 - ban that :) ;)
I recognise a couple of names from *other* BBs who are refugees from
SAABnet.

Paul
Dave Hinz - 20 Oct 2004 19:58 GMT

>> You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect
>> IP addresses proactively.

> Cool ... Mine is 64.139.33.19 - ban that :) ;)

OK, show of hands, who else just did a lookup on that IP?

Dave "/raises hand" Hinz
murphwiz - 20 Oct 2004 21:51 GMT
> >> If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
> >> Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> You realize this may be a fishing expedition so wazzizname can collect
> IP addresses proactively.

I've been banned numerous times already.. I do it for fun now.
Craig Ian Dewick - 29 Oct 2004 10:54 GMT
>If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
>It has the answers to most all questions plus a great bulletin board.

Ahoy mateys we've found a Saabnet stooge! 8-)

The *concept* that Saabnet embodies is very good, but the *implementation*
of that concept is extremely bad and gives the Saab enthusiast community a
very bad reputation amongst the ranks of prestige vehicle owners. The
primary reason is due to Scott's censorship (and blocking) of posts and his
posting policies in general.

The online forums on my C900 Workshop site (and all the other alternative
Saab online forum sites I have explored) have none of that superfluous shite
as I believe, as do most other site owners running forums for Saab
enthusists, that *everyone* should be freely able to use online forums for
genuine discussions about Saab-related issues without any censorship of
their posts even if a poster is the owner of an alternative site, forum,
etc. to one that might already exist on a particular site.

Fortunately, there are plenty of sites like mine that have been set up to
counter the negative image created by Saabnet. I've got one of the
alternative sites as most of you would know by now, but there are others
which you'll find if you do a search through google. Most of the Saab owners
clubs (such as SCCA here in Australia) have online forums too.

If you want global exposure you'll get a fairer hearing in this newsgroup
than you will on Saabnet. If you would like a more focused audience try
online forums, mailing lists, yahoo groups, etc. These things exist at my
site but there are plenty of other sites offering similar things.

My site is "http://www.saab900classic.net" for those who would like to check
it out. Mine is nowhere near the most extensive but it's the only one
actively supporting Saab C900 enthusiasts in Australia and New Zealand! 8-)

Regards,

Craig.

PS. Today I created a new mailing list for Saab NG900 enthusiasts as a
sister mailing list to the one I'm already running for Saab C900 enthusists.

The NG900 list is at "http://lios.apana.org.au/mailman/listinfo/saab_ng900"
if anyone wishes to subscribe to it and kick it off. I am not an NG900 owner
so I am happy to consider someone who is, and is passionate about their
car(s) and having an independent list for NG900's, to offer to become an
alternative list administrator. I'd prefer someone in Australia or NZ to
keep the local focus but like the web-based forums, the list is open to
everyone who has an interest in NG900's.
Signature

Craig Dewick - craig@circlet.apana.org.au - Founder/maintainer of the SunShack
at www.sunshack.org - Operator of Jedi (an APANA Sydney PoP) - please visit
www.jedi.apana.org.au or www.sydney.apana.org.au for more detailed information
Lover of SpamAssassin - high quality open-source spam killing for the masses!

Fred W. - 29 Oct 2004 15:46 GMT
>>If anyone needs a great website with all the info you could want about
>>Saabs, check www.saabnet.com
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> his
> posting policies in general.

<<snip a bunch of self promotions>>

While the forums at saabnet may be censored, the saabnet site is still the
single best collection of SAAB information on the web that I am aware of.
Your site may be good for C900 enthusiasts, Craig.  I cannot say since I am
not one.  OTOH, I have used the saabnet site for getting information about
9000's and NG900's for years and never once felt the need to post to the
fora there.

I have also successfully advertised and sold 2 cars through the Classifieds
section there at a total cost to me of $50.  I suppose I could have sold the
cars at zero cost on some other site or via spamming newsgroups, but the
amount of traffic at the saabnet site got the cars sold quickly and at the
prices I wanted.

I feel for those people who have been rebuffed by the saabnet owner/censor,
but that does not mean that the site is not a valuable resource or that
anyone who thinks that it is one is a "stooge."

Otherwise, better paint me a stooge...

-Fred W
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.