> >> >> >> In full production, the new Cadillac could sell 10,000
> >> >> >> units a year, GM sources say.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Shakin its a.s? yuk,
I felt that way first too.
It's grown on me though. Full marks to Renault for some innovative and
distinctive styling I reckon !
Saabs look better though. :-)
> and as for the Fiat Frog, my mate owns one. You know
> how back in the early seventies 96 owners would flash their headlights at
> each other when they passed each other, as in "oh you own one of these ugly
> ducklings too" Well Multipla owners are doing it today. Somehow I don't
> think Fix It Again Tony cars will ever quite match our beloved marque.
Yeah but you're certainly never ever going to get missed in one !
"I'll be the one in the really ugly car waiting for you" - lol.
> I take your point with the Japanese quip, but lets be honest Rover wouldn't
> exist without Honda.
True - but there's a lot of history behind that. If Rover hadn't been forced
shotgun style into the BL marriage I wouldn't be surprised if they were still a
premier marque.
I once had a P6 - 2000 TC and it was a stunning car for its day. How many 1963
designs got 125 bhp from 2 litres on a couple of SUs ( and tons of torque too )
?
> >> BTW do you find those silly English flags flying from French and German
> >> built cars irritating?
> >
> > As I'm not English and loathe football louts - YES especially so !
>
> It was a comment to all really, but we are obviously in agreement here.
Pleased to hear. I do so hate the Beckingham Palace sh.t etc.
> >> I mean if they're so patriotic, why didn't they buy
> >> British in the 70's and save the British car industry?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> put up with it. Remember the 80's Renault ad "Renault build a better car"
> well here in the UK we're still waiting for them to do just that.
There was a Lotus version of the Alpine was there not ? I seem to recall it did
well in rallying. I also recall it being quite sought after. Wasn't it the
original 'hot hatch' ? I have no personal experience of driving one but I
suspect the hot versions were somewhat better. Then again many cars' gearboxes
were like stirring porridge in those day !
I guess the standard version wan't the same. Been there done that too. My g/f
bought an MG Metro and that was actually a fun car to drive ( loads of fun
sometimes ) . You'd barely recognise the similarity with a standard L model
though.
I reckon current Renaults aren't bad. I got a ( prevous model ) Laguna as an
insurance loaner whilst my own vehicle was being fixed as a result of some idiot
boy racer chappie's idiotic antics. I was quite taken. Not quick enough though
for my liking - even with the 2 litre engine. Nice drive however.
Graham
dxyzc@nospam.com - 20 Feb 2005 21:37 GMT
>>>>>>>> In full production, the new Cadillac could sell 10,000
>>>>>>>>units a year, GM sources say.
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>
> Graham
Have any of you driven a CTS-V? My brother has one and it is one super
fast and well handling car. Some of the interior could be upgraded but
it is a very impressive car.
D
Al - 22 Feb 2005 00:15 GMT
<Absolutely enormous SNIP>
> There was a Lotus version of the Alpine was there not ? I seem to recall
> it did
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Graham
You're thinking of the Talbot Sunbeam Lotus, which was indeed a hoot of a
car, although whether you could officially call this or the Peugeot 205
1.9GTi the original hot hatch is probably debateable.
I had a Metro on site for a while, bugger with size ten site boots, kept
pressing accelerator and brake together. My GF at college dumped me, and
bought a fiat 126, funnily enough her Reg Plate was WAR *** % Seemed apt at
the time! (I don't think she dumped me for the car, she dumped me for the
six foot blonde surfer dude :-( Turned out OK though as my wife is a
SAAB fan.
Laguna is an OK motor, but I guess I'm fussy, I just love all things
Swedish, more Herring anyone?
Al
Martin Rich - 24 Feb 2005 07:36 GMT
><Absolutely enormous SNIP>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> gearboxes
>> were like stirring porridge in those day !
<yet more snippage>
>You're thinking of the Talbot Sunbeam Lotus, which was indeed a hoot of a
>car, although whether you could officially call this or the Peugeot 205
>1.9GTi the original hot hatch is probably debateable.
The hot versions of the first generation Renault 5 would also have had
claims to be early hot hatches and were certainly around a little
earlier than the 205. In standard form the original Renault 5 had a
longitudinal engine with power taken from the front, in the same way
as in the C900 (desperate attempt to remain on topic). Renault did
make souped-up versions with this standard configuration, but they
also made a very powerful version with the engine just behind the
front seats.
Returning to the Talbot Alpine, stirring porridge probably was a
fairly apt description for the gearchange in the early versions.
Chrysler had bought the former Rootes group (British) and Simca
(French) during the 1960s, and Talbot was a make introduced hurriedly
when the whole lot was sold to Peugeot around 1979.
Though I don't rember driving an AlpineI drove various examples of the
Talbot Horizon. This was essentially the same car sold in the US as
the Plymouth Horizon, and the one instance where Chrysler in the US
had any significant engineering or design influence on a European
model. US versions apparently had a Volkswagen engine and
transmission. European Horizons initially had European Chrysler
engines and gearboxes, and the influence from Chrysler US on the
gearbox design seems to have been one of the things that big motor
manufacturers did best in the 1970s: providing insufficient resources
for product development. I remember the gearchange on early Horizons
being appalling even by 1970s standards and I know that later models
had Peugeot's own (vastly superior) gearboxes.
Martin