Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Saab Cars / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lambda readings

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Piers - 28 Feb 2005 16:49 GMT
Hello all,

I've just had my '98 9000 2.3T tested for emissions (as part of the UK
MoT annual inspection) and see that the lambda value from my car is
1.001. According the the printout, the acceptable values are between
0.970 and 1.030.

The car has just over 106,000 miles on the clock and as far as I know
has never had the sensor replaced. Fuel economy isn't as good as it
might be, but that could easily be the fault of the fun pedal and the
driver...

So is it time for a new sensor?

Thanks for your input.
Colin Stamp - 28 Feb 2005 17:30 GMT
>Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Thanks for your input.

1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.

Cheers,

Colin.
Piers - 28 Feb 2005 17:51 GMT
> 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin.

Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
per gallon myself then!
James Sweet - 01 Mar 2005 03:33 GMT
> > 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
> per gallon myself then!

Many more things can affect your gas mileage than the Lambda sensor, if it's
gone down significantly you should check other things. Tire pressure is
quite possibly the most overlooked, even being quite mechanically able I had
neglected mine for a while (lousy weather to work on cars) and found they
were all around 25 PSI, filled them all up to 40 and my MPG went up
significantly, not to mention the car feels more responsive.
Paul Halliday - 01 Mar 2005 08:06 GMT
>> 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
> per gallon myself then!

It shows that your catalytic converter is working correctly. With the .001
percent carbon monoxide slipping through it's not perfect, but heck it's
*nothing* to be concerned with. Generally, if it's within range then it's
okay. My car puts out 4% (no cat), so that gives you an excuse to drive
yours more :)

Paul

1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.