> 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin.
Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
per gallon myself then!
James Sweet - 01 Mar 2005 03:33 GMT
> > 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
> per gallon myself then!
Many more things can affect your gas mileage than the Lambda sensor, if it's
gone down significantly you should check other things. Tire pressure is
quite possibly the most overlooked, even being quite mechanically able I had
neglected mine for a while (lousy weather to work on cars) and found they
were all around 25 PSI, filled them all up to 40 and my MPG went up
significantly, not to mention the car feels more responsive.
Paul Halliday - 01 Mar 2005 08:06 GMT
>> 1.001 is fine - practically smack on the ideal value.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks Colin - it looks like I have to take responsibility for the miles
> per gallon myself then!
It shows that your catalytic converter is working correctly. With the .001
percent carbon monoxide slipping through it's not perfect, but heck it's
*nothing* to be concerned with. Generally, if it's within range then it's
okay. My car puts out 4% (no cat), so that gives you an excuse to drive
yours more :)
Paul
1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/