Thanks to all of you for the help. Since I posted, I looked at a 2001 9-5
with a 6 cylinder engine, which also has a turbo. It has 90,000 miles on it.
Any issues I should look for on that one? Thanks.
> Thanks to all of you for the help. Since I posted, I looked at a 2001 9-5
> with a 6 cylinder engine, which also has a turbo. It has 90,000 miles on
> it.
> Any issues I should look for on that one? Thanks.
Yes, the engine. It's an Opel (GM) engine. Not a Saab-developed engine.
Fuel-consumption is higher than the I4's. It doesn't have at chain, so it
has higher servicecosts, than the I4.

Signature
----------------------------------------------------------
Saab - Fordi livet er for kort til biler med dårlig sikkerhed!
Johannes - 06 May 2005 14:53 GMT
> > Thanks to all of you for the help. Since I posted, I looked at a 2001 9-5
> > with a 6 cylinder engine, which also has a turbo. It has 90,000 miles on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Fuel-consumption is higher than the I4's. It doesn't have at chain, so it
> has higher servicecosts, than the I4.
This is the strange asymmetrical turbo where only one bank of V6 drives
the turbo wheel. Output is 200 bhp, in fact less than the non-turbo Opel
equivalent with 210 bhp. Nevertheless is should give a smooth drive that
some might like.
Piotr Charnewski - 07 May 2005 15:13 GMT
> > > Thanks to all of you for the help. Since I posted, I looked at a 2001 9-5
> > > with a 6 cylinder engine, which also has a turbo. It has 90,000 miles on
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> equivalent with 210 bhp. Nevertheless is should give a smooth drive that
> some might like.
Yes, this is a strange. I had no clue that only 3 cylinders out of 6 would
power the turbo. Isn't this something like a horse having 2 legs? :)