I am considering buying a 1992 Saab 900 Sedan that, according to the
current owner, has not been driven in over two years.(execpt on a few
occasions) Should a car NOT being driven be cause for concern?
A-
Saab Guy - 07 Jun 2005 20:55 GMT
> I am considering buying a 1992 Saab 900 Sedan that, according to the
> current owner, has not been driven in over two years.(execpt on a few
> occasions) Should a car NOT being driven be cause for concern?
> A-
Lionel,
To answer your question directly, I can say "NO".
But with with a time of 10 years, you must look at typical materials that age just from simple time.
The question of where the car has been sitting and what kind of conditions it has been sitting in, certainly can help you in understanding what you may or may not be getting into.
Rubber rots and tears over time
Plastic can crack
Metal can oxidize and rust away
Liquids can cause other materials to weaken
-------
For instance, a Saab parked in a good, safe and secure barn with a cover over it for 10 years in Northern Maine, may have simply problems with cold weather could have done to it.
A Saab parked in an open ashalt driveway in Florida for 10 years would clearly have massive paint discoloring and big time fluid and rubber rotting issues for sure.
A Saab parked in for 10 years on the coast of California, could have major rot due to the Ocean's Salt water effect.
A Saab parked in a mint garage in Denver, Colorado that was on wood, with wheels dismounted, all fluids drained prior to preparation for "10 year sitting", could be basically MINT perhaps.
See the trend.
Get more information to start figuring what kind of stuff the Saab may/may not need due to WHERE it has been sitting for the 10 years
SaabGuy
PAPAGENE4JACK - 08 Jun 2005 01:23 GMT
Ok lionell I have a 1992 saab 900s conv that I purchased new. It has been
nothing short of heartaches I cant tell you how much ive spent cause the
figure is huge. I had nothing but trouble since day one, everthing has
been replaced at least once. Now you have to ask yourself why isnt this
guy driving the car. Um maybe he cant afford the repairs which are very
expensive.or maybe it needs more work who knows but you should have the
car checked out by a saab dealer so you know what your getting into. Now
you must be thinging why has he kept the car so long. Simple the top goes
down and its damm pretty with the top down, good luck papa
James Sweet - 08 Jun 2005 03:16 GMT
> I am considering buying a 1992 Saab 900 Sedan that, according to the
> current owner, has not been driven in over two years.(execpt on a few
> occasions) Should a car NOT being driven be cause for concern?
> A-
Sitting is hard on cars, around here the interior rots, also gasoline
varnishes, oil gums up, rubber deteriorates, metal rusts, seals dry up, if
it was parked in a garage things may be much better off but you should still
expect to put some work into it.
Pooh Bear - 08 Jun 2005 05:42 GMT
> > I am considering buying a 1992 Saab 900 Sedan that, according to the
> > current owner, has not been driven in over two years.(execpt on a few
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it was parked in a garage things may be much better off but you should still
> expect to put some work into it.
The tyres are unlikely to be round any more either !
The battery will be totally shot I expect too. Lead acid isn't a technology
that's meant to 'stand'.
Graham
Mac Townsend - 08 Jun 2005 19:59 GMT
Time does damage.
Especially cooling system corrosion. if it was parked dry (no coolant at
all) then perhaps the damage is minimal. One fun thing about cooling
system corrosion is a bloewn head gasket, which on a SAAB is going to
cost about $2000 to fix (odds are you will need to find another head
that's not warped, since there's no meat on them to machine them flat
again (common to all OHC designs) plus all of the related stuff.
I thought I was getting a good deal on the 93 I bought 3 months ago for
1400. Now I know the speedo had been disconnected (when? dunno), I had
to spend $2300 for head gasket repair (incl a head), nearly a grand for
resolving a wierd ignition problem, etc.
If I had known beforehand, I'd not have it today. Even so, I do enjoy
driving it.
ma_twain - 08 Jun 2005 21:48 GMT
> Time does damage.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> If I had known beforehand, I'd not have it today. Even so, I do enjoy
> driving it.
So you spent $4,700 to get a 1993 Saab in driving condition. I spent
more than that to get a 1993 900 in mint condition. But that is exactly
why I paid the price, I did not have to spend any money or time to drive
it.
It could be worse, you could have bought a new on for $40,000 . . .
SmaartAasSaabr - 09 Jun 2005 01:45 GMT
I've done two HG's.
The first cost me $38 and the second cost $62. Just buy some tools...
Cars are made to be driven, simple. Best thing can be done is to drive
the car daily on a nice long highway run, ie every morning get in,
drive 100km at 145km/h, drive another 100 back I guess, and repeat.
Keep the car clean, plus change all the fluids and filtres and the
car will quickly depass the 1 000 000km mark and look like new.
But if you buy the car brand new, drive it a few 100 km, park it in
the driveway, near a tree and wait 15 years there likely won't be much
left for you there.
Most cars go through a "use period" that looks like this:
First 5 years - babied
5-15 years - "used"
15-25 years - sitting in a field, scrapped, sold for under 1000 and
driven into the scrapper, etc
25-30 years - fixed, restored, enjoyed in the summer and taken to
shows etc.
There are exceptions sure. The problem is the vast majority of cars
never get to that post-parked stage.
> Time does damage.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> If I had known beforehand, I'd not have it today. Even so, I do enjoy
> driving it.
Malt_Hound - 09 Jun 2005 15:04 GMT
> I've done two HG's.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> 25-30 years - fixed, restored, enjoyed in the summer and taken to
> shows etc.
Gee... it occurs to me that this looks alot like what hapens with
people too. Except for the "taken to shows" part...
-Fred W
hippo - 18 Jun 2005 12:04 GMT
>I am considering buying a 1992 Saab 900 Sedan that, according to the
>current owner, has not been driven in over two years.(execpt on a few
>occasions) Should a car NOT being driven be cause for concern?
No, but ... as others have said, lots of bits will deteriorate. Expect to
pay for a full service, new battery, tyres, water pump & hoses as a
probable minimum to avoid heartache. If you can spend all that and still
come out ahead, it's probably a good buy even if something else fails.
Cheers