Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Saab Cars / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

9-3 Vector Sport 150 TiD

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
físho - 17 Jun 2005 00:33 GMT
Hi all,

Just ordered one of these for my next company car. I've currently got a
BMW330i Sport, so I'm under no illusion that it'll be slower, but this one
is *tons* cheaper in tax. Oddly enough, I didn't bother test driving one. I
ordered it all on hear-say from a collegue who said "It's a Saab, of course
it'll be OK". What's the handling / drivability (?) like?

Another question. Saab's website has it's 0-60 time at 9.0 seconds, but a
lot of magazines appear to have it as 9.5 seconds. (including Saab's own Jan
'05 brochure). Any ideas?

Ta,

Signature

fisho.

Henrik B. - 17 Jun 2005 15:06 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I ordered it all on hear-say from a collegue who said "It's a Saab, of
> course it'll be OK". What's the handling / drivability (?) like?

It has great handling. Some German Auto-mag's even tested it better than the
Bimmer 3-series, in comparison.

> Another question. Saab's website has it's 0-60 time at 9.0 seconds, but a
> lot of magazines appear to have it as 9.5 seconds. (including Saab's own
> Jan '05 brochure). Any ideas?

Who cares? What matters is the fast overtaking, without having to shift
down, that's what really matters. :o)

CHeers!
Tex - 18 Jun 2005 15:10 GMT
>> Another question. Saab's website has it's 0-60 time at 9.0 seconds, but a
>> lot of magazines appear to have it as 9.5 seconds. (including Saab's own
>> Jan '05 brochure). Any ideas?
>
> Who cares? What matters is the fast overtaking, without having to shift
> down, that's what really matters. :o)

How does the performance compare vs the petrol-powered models (175hp and 210
hp)?

Being in the US, Americans have a slight distaste for anything
diesel-powered other than trucks.  Perhaps this stems from their
less-than-desirable experiences with older, rough-running Mercedes and VW
Rabbits.

- tex
Johannes - 18 Jun 2005 03:17 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ta,

Neither. It's 9.2 seconds. (Auto Express)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.