> to its own version of Subarus B9 Tribeca.
> (9-6X)
>
> http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_article.asp?na_id=215454
> > Saab has given the go ahead
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Graham
*Gag* you weren't kidding, that thing is hideous!
Pooh Bear - 24 Jul 2005 02:29 GMT
> > > Saab has given the go ahead
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> *Gag* you weren't kidding, that thing is hideous!
If you don't already have it get a copy of Infanview ( free media viewer )
and rotate the image.
It looks better upside down.
Graham
James Sweet - 24 Jul 2005 03:46 GMT
> > > > Saab has given the go ahead
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Graham
Irfanview, and yeah it's a great little program.
> Christ ! That looks ugly.
Well, wait a sec...there are two picturess there, both of very different
looking vehicles. Which one is of the actual 9-6x?
I've seen the picture over to the right a number of times prior (i had hoped
they'd alter the design before production time, but apparently not).
However regardless, both are butt ugly.
- tex
Saab Guy - 24 Jul 2005 19:42 GMT
> > Christ ! That looks ugly.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - tex
Tex,
Those photos are of the Subaru Tribeca on the left, and the Saab 9-3X on the right.
The Saab 9-6x has yet to be depicted anywhere as far as I have seen.
If you see any photos of the 9-6x, please let me know.
SaabGuy
Paul Halliday - 24 Jul 2005 19:50 GMT
>> Christ ! That looks ugly.
>
> Well, wait a sec...there are two picturess there, both of very different
> looking vehicles. Which one is of the actual 9-6x?
Erm, neither one is really the "belle of the ball" :)
> I've seen the picture over to the right a number of times prior (i had hoped
> they'd alter the design before production time, but apparently not).
> However regardless, both are butt ugly.
Indeed!
Paul
Vart tog vägen vägen?
SAAB : Nothing on earth comes close
Pidgeonpost - 24 Jul 2005 22:20 GMT
> on 24/07/2005 18:42:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Vart tog vägen vägen?
> SAAB : Nothing on earth comes close
...excellent...just what we need over here in Blighty - another
over-specified, overweight, overpowered, overthirsty 4WD...
MH - 24 Jul 2005 23:08 GMT
> ...excellent...just what we need over here in Blighty - another
> over-specified, overweight, overpowered, overthirsty 4WD...
Exactly.
If SuperSize is good for the USA, it's good for you!

Signature
MH
'72 97 '77 96 '78 95 '79 96
'91 900i
James Sweet - 25 Jul 2005 01:15 GMT
> > ...excellent...just what we need over here in Blighty - another
> > over-specified, overweight, overpowered, overthirsty 4WD...
>
> Exactly.
> If SuperSize is good for the USA, it's good for you!
With $6/gallon gas would anyone over there actually buy one?
Pooh Bear - 25 Jul 2005 03:20 GMT
> > Christ ! That looks ugly.
>
> Well, wait a sec...there are two picturess there, both of very different
> looking vehicles. Which one is of the actual 9-6x?
I rather assumed it was the one right next to the text saying " Saab 9-6X gets
the green light "
> I've seen the picture over to the right a number of times prior (i had hoped
> they'd alter the design before production time, but apparently not).
> However regardless, both are butt ugly.
The 9-6x doubly so. Considering it's based on a Subaru, that's hardly
surprising. For the life of me I cannot understand how Subaru manage to make an
entire range of vehicles so visually unattractive.
Graham
Tex - 25 Jul 2005 16:21 GMT
> I rather assumed it was the one right next to the text saying " Saab 9-6X
> gets
> the green light "
I did as well, however, i think it might simply be mislabelled. The one on
the left must be the actual subaru version and the one on the right, clearly
the saab version. Though the accompanying text is misleading at best.
> The 9-6x doubly so.
Why would they ditch the sleek, sexy and now signature wraparound head
lamps? I can't believe the 9-6x will go to production like that. It has to
be a mistake.
> Considering it's based on a Subaru, that's hardly
> surprising. For the life of me I cannot understand how Subaru manage to
> make an
> entire range of vehicles so visually unattractive.
Agreed.
- tex
Saab Guy - 25 Jul 2005 19:09 GMT
> > I rather assumed it was the one right next to the text saying " Saab 9-6X
> > gets
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> - tex
Tex,
The one on the RIGHT is NOT the 9-6x, it is the 9-3x
There have been no public photos of the 9-6x as of yet.
That's what is going on on that page.
SaabGuy
Tex - 26 Jul 2005 18:56 GMT
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:21:22 -0400
> The one on the RIGHT is NOT the 9-6x, it is the 9-3x
>
> There have been no public photos of the 9-6x as of yet.
>
> That's what is going on on that page.
Well, they sure made it is as confusing as hell!
- tex
Pooh Bear - 26 Jul 2005 23:55 GMT
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:21:22 -0400
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Well, they sure made it is as confusing as hell!
Agreed. You sure wouldn't have worked it out from the text !
Graham
Saab Guy - 27 Jul 2005 00:38 GMT
> > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:21:22 -0400
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Graham
Graham,
It is confusing, why talk about a model and show 2 photos (none of which are the model they speak of).
They shoulda, woulda, coulda provided information pertaining to the photos specifically indicating that neither were the 9-6x.
I guess mathmatical deduction came into place here.
- R
> The front end looks a bit like someone screwed an Alfa grille on upside
> down.
That is effectively going to be the front end ofr al new Subarus.
Seen some recent photos of the enxt Impreza with a very similar front
end.

Signature
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com