Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Saab Cars / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

If you had to choose!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Should I - 20 Jan 2006 21:31 GMT
If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
which would you choose and why?
Nasty Bob - 20 Jan 2006 22:19 GMT
> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
> which would you choose and why?

I should choose the fish.
Dave Hinz - 20 Jan 2006 22:24 GMT
>> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
>> which would you choose and why?

> I should choose the fish.

Bob, you're being stranger than usual today.  And that's saying alot.

Dave "I say that with the appropriate respect and admiration" Hinz

P.S.  I'd buy the 4 cyl.
Paul Halliday - 21 Jan 2006 11:58 GMT
> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
> which would you choose and why?

I'd go for the 4 cylinder, without question; a 2.3 where possible. The V6
does not have a good reputation. That said, the 4 cylinder (both the 2.0 and
the 2.3) of that era did suffer from sludging problems.

Paul

1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Fred W - 21 Jan 2006 12:41 GMT
> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
> which would you choose and why?

I would choose the 4 cyl because I prefer that engine.   I change my own
oil and so do it more often than the SAAB recomended therefore have no
sludging problems.  But most importantly, I prefer the sedan to a "wagon".

Signature

-Fred W

Paul Halliday - 21 Jan 2006 20:03 GMT
>> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
>> which would you choose and why?
>
> I would choose the 4 cyl because I prefer that engine.   I change my own
> oil and so do it more often than the SAAB recomended therefore have no
> sludging problems.  But most importantly, I prefer the sedan to a "wagon".

How often do you change the oil, Fred?

On my C900, I change as soon after 3000 miles as I can remember. I'm of the
opinion that a 9-5 HPT should be changed as frequently. I keep thinking
about a 9-5 (yeah, yeah ... As well as a 9000 Anni), just to give the C900 a
break and get it done up to the standard that I cannot while it is in daily
and quite constant use. A 9-5 of that era (early 2000s) is within the price
range that I'm prepared to pay. I'd go for a 2.3 Sedan. Very plush cars,
indeed.

Do we know what the actual cause of the sludging is? From what I have read,
it is a problem with the crankcase breathing/vent system, which SAAB put
forward a fix and then seemed to withdraw. Was it down to the internal shape
of the catch tank? Maybe that was an additional problem. Dave (Hinz) - did
you resolve your issue? On a second-hand car, what would an ideal fix be?

Paul

1989 900 Turbo S
http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
Fred W - 22 Jan 2006 12:15 GMT
>>>If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
>>>which would you choose and why?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> 1989 900 Turbo S
> http://saab.go.dyndns.org/

Well, I'm not talking C900's here, but I generally change my oil at
~5000  mile intervals.  SAAB actually recommends 20k kilometer intervals
(12.5k miles) as a base in the WIS, shortening duration when subjected
to severe duty.

Signature

-Fred W

Johannes - 22 Jan 2006 16:31 GMT
> >>>If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
> >>>which would you choose and why?
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> (12.5k miles) as a base in the WIS, shortening duration when subjected
> to severe duty.

It also depends on what the oil looks like. When I did mostly short
journeys in my 9000, I changed oil/filter at 3000 miles. Now I'm doing
longer motorway driving and change at 4500 miles. I use Halford's fully
synt 5W40 cost £29.95/5L, but usually on BOGOF sale late December.  

> --
> -Fred W
ma_twain - 22 Jan 2006 23:58 GMT
>>>> If you had to choose between a 2001 9-5(4 cyl) vs 9-5 SE(V6) wagon
>>>> which would you choose and why?
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> (12.5k miles) as a base in the WIS, shortening duration when subjected
> to severe duty.

When you have a Red Box and a short shift kit in your C900 Turbo, it is always "severe duty" :-)

I did not buy that car to drive very cautiously - that is why I also
have a minivan.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.