>> http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/354/C6639/
>>
>> intersting, but who cares...it'll never actually see the light of day.
>I also found this...
>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/02/21/is-this-the-saab-aero-x/
>together with this comment ......
>" 8. GM is determined to screw up every brand in their stable as quickly
>as possible, aren't they?
>Saab is the perfect vehicle for them to take the emerging premium small
>car market- emphasizing fuel economy and European dynamics and safety.
>Instead they are going to release this horrid Camaro wannabe and further
>destroy the brand equity.
>May GM die a quick death, that is all I can hope for given their continued
>idiocy."
>Can't say I'm any fan of the UScentric 'Gotham City' styling.
>Why are GM trying to force US styling on a great European brand ?
Perhaps because they want everything to look like a copy of Chrysler's
PT-Cruiser I guess. 8-) That's another disgustingly horrible looking vehicle
btw.
Craig.

Signature
Craig's Saab C900 Page at | Craig's Classic Saab Workshop - Sydney .au
http://lios.apana.org.au/~c900 | http://www.classicsaab.net and other URL's
Email: c900@lios.apana.org.au | For Saab 99/C900/9000 Enthusiasts World-Wide!
Alternate: saabonaut@gmail.com | Web-forums, galleries, library, links, etc.