Words fail me.....
http://www.turbonator.com/index.html
Al
;-))
>Words fail me.....
>
>http://www.turbonator.com/index.html
Yahhhh!
From the website
"If every vehicle in this nation averaged just 2.7 more miles per
gallon, we could eleminate our dependancy on mid east oil." (sic)
Wow, an extra 2.7 miles per gallon - that's like a 100% improvement in
fuel efficiency for some vehicles on the road in the USA :-)
Sorry, I'll pass on this opportunity.

Signature
Andrew Sinclair http://www.smellycat.org
Fred W - 02 Aug 2006 20:24 GMT
>> Words fail me.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Sorry, I'll pass on this opportunity.
This is the best one:
"Just keep this in mind. A Vortech Supercharger kit for a 2004 Mustang
that produces 155 HP boost costs $5,139.95. The Price/Performance ratio
is $5,139.95/155HP = $33.16/HP. It costs $33.16 for every one horsepower
it produces. All the Turbonator has to give you to beat the Vortech
supercharger in terms of it's price/performance ratio is 3 horsepower."
...but they do fail to mention that the "Turbonator" will actually cause
a net negative in horsepower since all it really does is partially block
the intake. So what is the cost per horsepower produced then?
Infinite I would imagine...

Signature
-Fred W
ZOT - 04 Aug 2006 21:31 GMT
>>> Words fail me.....
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Infinite I would imagine...
god! I can't wait. Think of the possibilities when they are installed
in series. Is the power increase additive or exponential? If you have
2, does the horsepower compound like interest on your money? Wow!
> Words fail me.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ;-))
Lovely website. Lets not go into the physics, but if I have four, do I get
four times the improvement? :)

Signature
The DervMan
www.dervman.com
> Words fail me.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ;-))
Yes, sounds fishy. However, turbulence or 'swirl' can work, but needs to
be applied directly to the mixture in the cylinder ports, not an aftermarket
attachment to the air intake. There are probably more air turbulence from
the air filter.
I once had a Fiat Croma CHT, it was an economy model which had the special
Controlled High Turbulence engine. It only produced 90bhp from a 2.0L engine,
but had more torque than the standard 120bhp engine and an amazing economy.
DervMan - 03 Aug 2006 17:58 GMT
>> Words fail me.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> attachment to the air intake. There are probably more air turbulence from
> the air filter.
Spot on. The important bit is that it's bespoke to each engine, not a
generic "one tuning module fits everything" approach of course.
> I once had a Fiat Croma CHT, it was an economy model which had the special
> Controlled High Turbulence engine. It only produced 90bhp from a 2.0L
> engine,
> but had more torque than the standard 120bhp engine and an amazing
> economy.

Signature
The DervMan
www.dervman.com