>> forever,
>> it only needs topping up.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>number of miles it's driven." If she is right, and I have no idea if she
>is, that adds up to a lot oil.
Nonsense. While short trips to require more frequent change intervals,
no one with a clue suggests 1K changes. If you want some scientific
facts, go out to bobistheoilguy.com and look into the guys actually
testing their oil in labs.
There are Saab engines running over 300K miles without major rebuilds
on 3K dino and 5K synthetic changes. There's plenty of evidence to
suggest that even that is more frequent than needed - see the guys
testing oil (above).
>On Coolant she says " You should definitely
>change your coolant in two situations. The first is if you haven't changed
>it a year or in the past 20,000 miles."
A little shy, but not as bad as her oil claim. 2 years or 24K miles.
The reason is that the anti-corrosive compounds can break down. Use
Saab coolant.
>Additionally she seems to be
>suspicious of the manufacturer's recommended intervals for oil changes for
>the simple reason that the manufacturer wants you to buy another car, and
>steps to lengthen the life of your present car are not in the manufacturer's
>interest.
Total BS. Warranties are 100K on a lot of motors these days. They want
them to last. Plus, if she was right, why don't the oil companies
promote shorter change intervals ? Why don't auto mechanics working on
their own cars go with shorter intervals ?
> Keep in mind that many people have Sclar's book and it has become
>a kind of bible for car owners. I am not holding this book up as a shining
>example of truth. She might be right and she might be wrong.
She's wrong. In fact she so easily promotes total supposition in the
face of actual science that I would question anything else she says.
Richard Sauer - 10 Mar 2007 00:48 GMT
Bob wrote: (Good info snipped)
>>On Coolant she says " You should definitely
>>change your coolant in two situations. The first is if you haven't changed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The reason is that the anti-corrosive compounds can break down. Use
> Saab coolant.
I read that somwhere..probably here..and had the old coolant (whatever it
was) flushed and Saab coolant added.
Your response was most interesting. Thanks for taking the time to counter
Ms. Sclar's statements.
Rich Sauer
Richard Sauer - 10 Mar 2007 01:02 GMT
One more statement from Sclar's book:
"When you start your car in the morning, do you warm it up before you drive
off? If you do, no good! Most manuals caution you not to indulge in lengthy
warm-ups. They waste fuel, pollute the air, and increase wear on your
vehicle." pg. 510 True or False? I always imagined that letting your car
warm up would allow the fluids to circulate, but that might be an
old-wive's tale.
Rich
johannes - 10 Mar 2007 10:38 GMT
> One more statement from Sclar's book:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Rich
The book is right, just drive off (gently) is better. But don't put your foot
down before engine has reached normal temp.
- Bob - - 12 Mar 2007 00:24 GMT
>One more statement from Sclar's book:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Rich
Mostly true. Let it warm up enough that the oil is flowing. That's
maybe a minute at most in very cold weather. I've seen some guys who
have it in gear before the starter has even stopped spinning... not
good. I have a manual, I like to let the tranny spin in neutral for a
ten seconds to flow the oil before engaging a gear. But, not much time
either way.
johannes - 10 Mar 2007 09:25 GMT
> >> forever,
> >> it only needs topping up.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> suggest that even that is more frequent than needed - see the guys
> testing oil (above).
Yes, 1000 miles interval is definitely too short. I change at around 4000
miles with a lot of motorway driving. It feels like the engine sounds
better after a change.
> >On Coolant she says " You should definitely
> >change your coolant in two situations. The first is if you haven't changed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The reason is that the anti-corrosive compounds can break down. Use
> Saab coolant.
Depends on what it says on the tin. You can now get 3 or 5 years lifetime
for coolant products. Naturally, it needs topping up if the level goes down.
> >Additionally she seems to be
> >suspicious of the manufacturer's recommended intervals for oil changes for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> promote shorter change intervals ? Why don't auto mechanics working on
> their own cars go with shorter intervals ?
However, I still think manufacturers are short sighted. Companies often
replace their cars after 3 years (uk) because they expect everything to
be totally reliable during that period. An older car is seen as a hazard
as it could break down on the way to an important meeting or function.
A three year old car has depreciated to about ~40% , but this gives us a
nice supply of excellent secondhand cars. But around that time the car
gets a kind of mid-life crisis; clutch, brakes, timing belts, drive belts,
bulbs and other niggles, it's almost as if this was designed that way.
> Additionally she seems to be
> suspicious of the manufacturer's recommended intervals for oil changes for
> the simple reason that the manufacturer wants you to buy another car
Typical American conspiracy theory !
So I assume you've missed the single most important thing which is to use
synthetic oil ?
Graham
Richard Sauer - 10 Mar 2007 16:32 GMT
>> Additionally she seems to be
>> suspicious of the manufacturer's recommended intervals for oil changes
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Graham
Don't assume that I've missed something. Assume that Ms Sclar did.
Rich