Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Saab Cars / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Latest Saab 9-3 retains distinctive personality, performance"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 30 Sep 2007 02:03 GMT
Latest Saab 9-3 retains distinctive personality, performance at
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070921/AUTO/109210035/1009
still me - 30 Sep 2007 04:08 GMT
>Latest Saab 9-3 retains distinctive personality, performance at
>http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070921/AUTO/109210035/1009

Managed to get a "quirky" in there too - can't have a Saab article
without that word!!!
johannes - 30 Sep 2007 10:44 GMT
> Latest Saab 9-3 retains distinctive personality, performance at
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070921/AUTO/109210035/1009

We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models are
all going to be made in Rüsselsheim, Germany along with Opel cars!
Adrian - 30 Sep 2007 11:11 GMT
> We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
> also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models are
> all going to be made in Rüsselsheim, Germany along with Opel cars!

Well, apart from the Opels which'll be built at Trollhatten...
johannes - 30 Sep 2007 11:23 GMT
> > We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
> > also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models are
> > all going to be made in Rüsselsheim, Germany along with Opel cars!
>
> Well, apart from the Opels which'll be built at Trollhatten...

That doesn't make sense? I have heard that the Saab based Cadillac BLS
will be build in Trollhatten.
Adrian - 30 Sep 2007 11:34 GMT
>> > We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
>> > also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models
>> > are all going to be made in Rüsselsheim, Germany along with Opel
>> > cars!

>> Well, apart from the Opels which'll be built at Trollhatten...

> That doesn't make sense?

You want sense from GM? Anyway, my c900 was built in Finland.

> I have heard that the Saab based Cadillac BLS

"Saab based"? Well, yes, it's a Vectra C, as is the 93.

> will be build in Trollhatten.

It has been for a couple of years - but Trollhatten's going to be gutted
and refitted for the next Astra - which will be built at Trollhatten,
Ellesmere Port (UK), Gliwice (PL) & Bochum (DE).
johannes - 30 Sep 2007 12:11 GMT
[...]

> It has been for a couple of years - but Trollhatten's going to be gutted
> and refitted for the next Astra - which will be built at Trollhatten,
> Ellesmere Port (UK), Gliwice (PL) & Bochum (DE).

That next Astra will of course spurn the ugly Saab 9-1. But then BMW 1
series is also ugly, so Saab has to reflect that :-) Anyway, Saab 9-3 is
selling well, that is my impression from the cars I spot on the streets.
johannes - 30 Sep 2007 18:15 GMT
> >> > We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
> >> > also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> "Saab based"? Well, yes, it's a Vectra C, as is the 93.

It looks close to the Saab 9-3, but with sharp creases. It also
has the same turbo engines, but is softer sprung. A pointless
car for the European market.
Eeyore - 30 Sep 2007 21:24 GMT
> > >> > We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
> > >> > also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> has the same turbo engines, but is softer sprung. A pointless
> car for the European market.

Being lumbered with the Cadillac badge was the final straw. It's not as if it's
a brand that your average European is likely to aspire to.

Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?

Graham
Adrian - 30 Sep 2007 21:28 GMT
> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?

Since Chevrolet is "GM's global value brand" - value being used in the same
sense as "Tesco stripy" - and is the badge now stuck onto Daewoos, I doubt
it's quite what they're aiming for with the BLT...
Eeyore - 30 Sep 2007 23:04 GMT
> > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>
> Since Chevrolet is "GM's global value brand" - value being used in the same
> sense as "Tesco stripy" - and is the badge now stuck onto Daewoos, I doubt
> it's quite what they're aiming for with the BLT...

At least it's not associated with white haired Floridians and a reputation for
building barges.

I doubt many in the UK know it's a 'value brand' anyway (aside from Daewoo
having being renamed Chevrolet). They're more likely to look at the Corvette and
think 'Ooohh' !

Graham
johannes - 01 Oct 2007 10:44 GMT
> > > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> having being renamed Chevrolet). They're more likely to look at the Corvette and
> think 'Ooohh' !

Or they're are usually trucks? Chevy trucks have this very prominent
Chevy cross on the front.
Eeyore - 01 Oct 2007 13:52 GMT
> > > > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Or they're are usually trucks? Chevy trucks have this very prominent
> Chevy cross on the front.

Not something you'd see in the UK. There's no real market for 'trucks' here.

Graham
johannes - 01 Oct 2007 14:16 GMT
> > > > > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Graham

Yes, a strange difference to the US market where trucks are the thing to
have, apparently. But trucks have high fuel consumption due to drag, and
we pay over twice as much for fuel.
Eeyore - 01 Oct 2007 14:29 GMT
> > > > > > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> have, apparently. But trucks have high fuel consumption due to drag, and
> we pay over twice as much for fuel.

Is it strange ? Why would the average person even want a 'truck' ?

Graham
johannes - 01 Oct 2007 15:01 GMT
> > > > > > > Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Graham

Dunno, ask the US citizens here why they wanna pick-up truck, many of
them have one.
Richard Sutherland-Smith - 01 Oct 2007 21:11 GMT
>>>>>>>> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>
>> Graham

> Dunno, ask the US citizens here why they wanna pick-up truck, many of
> them have one.

To clear the snow in the NE! I remember seeing new ones for sale with
snowploughs attached.

Signature

Richard Sutherland-Smith
 19 Webb Road, Wanganui 4500, NZ

Fred W - 01 Oct 2007 22:53 GMT
>>>>>>>>Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Dunno, ask the US citizens here why they wanna pick-up truck, many of
> them have one.

ahem...  US citizen here.  I don't have a pickup truck.  My father had
one when we lived in Maine.  It was a 3/4 ton 4x4 Harvester
International and had an 8' snow plow on it and an 8' bed in the back.
We used to load it up with the wood cabinets that he manufactured in his
shop and make deliveries to his customers in Mass.  We also plowed his
"driveway" which was really a 1/8 mile long gravel road.

I have a Ford Explorer, which is an SUV built on a small 1/4 ton truck
chassis.  The only reason I bought that beast was to pull my boat (to
the water) because any kind of waterfront property (including the little
boat slips) here is ultra expensive.

But having an SUV that will fit full sheets of plywood or drywall, move
my kids back and forth to college, has a penned in area for our 2
Labradors in the back when they've just been for a swim,  has AWD to get
us to the skiing in bad weather, etc. etc. is kind of handy.  It's sort
of utilitarian.  In a sporty way.  And there's no doubt it is a vehicle.

The MAIN downside to the whole equation is that it gobbles gas like
there's no tomorrow (an appropriate phrase).  However, neither I nor my
wife "commute" and therefore the horrible gas mileage is of little
concern to *us*.

I don't say that I am the average US citizen.  Not in the least.  The
average guy here buys one vehicle and uses that to do everything
including some ridiculously long commute (by himself) every day.  I,
OTOH burn more of my hydrocarbons in pusuit of happiness, than in pusuit
of employment.  And that's the way I like it, yeah that's the way I like
it...

Signature

-Fred W

Fred W - 01 Oct 2007 23:13 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> of employment.  And that's the way I like it, yeah that's the way I like
> it...

yes I do know how to spell pursuit.  I have no idea why I missed the "r"
twice in the prior post.

What the hell is "pusuit" anyway?

Signature

-Fred W

still me - 03 Oct 2007 03:11 GMT
>ahem...  US citizen here.  I don't have a pickup truck.  My father had
>one when we lived in Maine. <snip>

He had a good reason to have one.

>I have a Ford Explorer, which is an SUV built on a small 1/4 ton truck
>chassis.  The only reason I bought that beast was to pull my boat
<snip>

and you have a good reason too.

>I don't say that I am the average US citizen.  Not in the least.  The
>average guy here buys one vehicle and uses that to do everything
>including some ridiculously long commute (by himself) every day.  I,
>OTOH burn more of my hydrocarbons in pusuit of happiness, than in pusuit
>of employment.  And that's the way I like it, yeah that's the way I like
>it...

Fred, you (and maybe me) the exceptions. All the cowboys here in the
USA in their baseball hats used to buy trucks. Now most of them buy
SUV's. Few of them ever haul anything. Many SUV's are driven by women
who would never put anything bigger than their pocketbooks inside. I
know a number of guys who actually make use of their truck or SUV
enough to justify it (like you cited above). But, most of them are a
bunch of ding-dongs and hee-haws without a clue. They don't know
enough about handling and performance to even understand what a POS
their poorly conceived and poorly engineered SUV is.
Fred W - 03 Oct 2007 13:34 GMT
>>ahem...  US citizen here.  I don't have a pickup truck.  My father had
>>one when we lived in Maine. <snip>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> enough about handling and performance to even understand what a POS
> their poorly conceived and poorly engineered SUV is.

Yeah, I hear you.  I am amazed at the number of goof-balls that drive
their 3/4 ton V8 engined pickup back and forth to work, empty and alone.
 I laugh when I see them with the tailgate down, or the net in place of
the tailgate, because they believe that will save them a bunch of gas.

My Dad had a phrase he used to categorize this type of person.
"More money than brains," he'd say.
And they don't have all that much money...

Signature

-Fred W

still me - 04 Oct 2007 00:00 GMT
>Yeah, I hear you.  I am amazed at the number of goof-balls that drive
>their 3/4 ton V8 engined pickup back and forth to work, empty and alone.
>  I laugh when I see them with the tailgate down, or the net in place of
>the tailgate, because they believe that will save them a bunch of gas.

And like the SUV drivers, they drive them right off your rear end...
because big vehicles apparently surpass the laws of physics and stop
on a dime.
Fred W - 04 Oct 2007 02:23 GMT
>>Yeah, I hear you.  I am amazed at the number of goof-balls that drive
>>their 3/4 ton V8 engined pickup back and forth to work, empty and alone.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> because big vehicles apparently surpass the laws of physics and stop
> on a dime.

I've noticed this more often with women than men.

On a completely different matter, I've heard that most women have
difficulty with Physics class in high school.

Signature

-Fred W

Mick x - 04 Oct 2007 19:37 GMT
Ouch to a sweeping commnet - take cover Fred :)

On 4/10/07 02:23, in article ya6dnZDL77cc3ZnanZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@comcast.com,

>>> Yeah, I hear you.  I am amazed at the number of goof-balls that drive
>>> their 3/4 ton V8 engined pickup back and forth to work, empty and alone.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> On a completely different matter, I've heard that most women have
> difficulty with Physics class in high school.
Fred W - 01 Oct 2007 22:37 GMT
>>>>>>>Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Graham

You have to ask?

Its the same reason that you want a hatchback, only much, much bigger cargo.

Signature

-Fred W

Fred W - 01 Oct 2007 22:35 GMT
>>>>>>Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> have, apparently. But trucks have high fuel consumption due to drag, and
> we pay over twice as much for fuel.

Not just drag, although that helps (hurts?), but also the hugemungous
engines they come with.  OTOH, what else are you going to use to pull
that 25' fishing boat with the twin 250hp outboard engines and 300
gallon fuel tank?

Signature

-Fred W

Eeyore - 02 Oct 2007 01:15 GMT
> >>>>>>Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> that 25' fishing boat with the twin 250hp outboard engines and 300
> gallon fuel tank?

I'll bet there are vastly more trucks than 25 foot boats with twin outboards..

Graham
Jorgen Moquist - 05 Oct 2007 01:48 GMT
>> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>
> Since Chevrolet is "GM's global value brand" - value being used in the same
> sense as "Tesco stripy" - and is the badge now stuck onto Daewoos, I doubt
> it's quite what they're aiming for with the BLT...
BLT :-) Bread Lettuce and Tomato ?, is'n it named BLS ?
and manufactured in Trollhättan ( troll + hätta ).
troll is a troll & hätta is old name for womens hat or cap.
/Jorgen
Jorgen Moquist - 05 Oct 2007 01:51 GMT
>>> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> troll is a troll & hätta is old name for womens hat or cap.
> /Jorgen

hm. hätta would probably be translated to fire nowadays,
not hat.
/Jorgen
Jorgen Moquist - 05 Oct 2007 01:53 GMT
>>>> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> not hat.
> /Jorgen
so trollhättan would be, "the trollheat" :-)
/Jorgen
still me - 05 Oct 2007 03:29 GMT
>> /Jorgen
>so trollhättan would be, "the trollheat" :-)

Well, I like it - but when was Trollhatten founded vs. when the
language changed?
Jorgen Moquist - 05 Oct 2007 22:32 GMT
>>> /Jorgen
>> so trollhättan would be, "the trollheat" :-)
>
> Well, I like it - but when was Trollhatten founded vs. when the
> language changed?
i was wrong it will be troll + hat/cap. ( the trollhat ).
Founded 1200 and named Eiöar ( narrow water passage ).
Called Trollhetta 1430 in Erik Af Pommern's taxregister.
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trollh%C3%A4ttan
/Jorgen
Adrian - 05 Oct 2007 07:58 GMT
Jorgen Moquist (jorgen.moquist@n.o.s.p.a.m.mailbox.swipnet.se) gurgled
happily, sounding much like they were saying :

>> troll is a troll & hätta is old name for womens hat or cap.

> hm. hätta would probably be translated to fire nowadays,
> not hat.

Mmmm. Spicy troll.
Eeyore - 05 Oct 2007 05:46 GMT
> >> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> >
> > Since Chevrolet is "GM's global value brand" - value being used in the same
> > sense as "Tesco stripy" - and is the badge now stuck onto Daewoos, I doubt
> > it's quite what they're aiming for with the BLT...
> BLT :-) Bread Lettuce and Tomato ?,

Bacon lettuce and tomato actually. Maybe they should have called it that.

As for dodgy naming, I wonder how popular Jeep's Patriot is over here.

Graham
Johannes Andersen - 05 Oct 2007 07:24 GMT
> > >> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Graham

I must correct you there. It is: Bacon, lettuce and tomato.
You forgot the comma!
Eeyore - 05 Oct 2007 08:38 GMT
> > > >> Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I must correct you there. It is: Bacon, lettuce and tomato.
> You forgot the comma!

I apologise profusely, O Wise One.        ;~)

Graham
Adrian - 05 Oct 2007 08:47 GMT
> I must correct you there. It is: Bacon, lettuce and tomato.
> You forgot the comma!

I always pick the commas out of BLT sarnies - they get stuck in my teeth.
still me - 30 Sep 2007 21:37 GMT
>Being lumbered with the Cadillac badge was the final straw. It's not as if it's
>a brand that your average European is likely to aspire to.
>
>Would it have done better as a Chevrolet maybe ?

Neither is it a car the average Caddy buyer would want. Yet another
stroke of brilliance by GM. They consistently take brands that have a
following and throw a car under the badge that has characteristics no
one who buys that badge wants.

There's a reason they lose money year after year.
Eeyore - 30 Sep 2007 14:57 GMT
> > > We then have "This Swedish manufacture". The Scandinavian origin is
> > > also heavily emphasized in the UK TV commercials. But Saab models are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That doesn't make sense? I have heard that the Saab based Cadillac BLS
> will be build in Trollhatten.

It IS built there. Or was at least. Did they ever manage to sell any sensible
quantity of them ? I've been trying to find numbers for ages without much luck.
It bombed on launch and hasn't been much seen since. It was a truly daft idea, no
surprise there.

Graham
Adrian - 30 Sep 2007 15:13 GMT
>> That doesn't make sense? I have heard that the Saab based Cadillac
>> BLS will be build in Trollhatten.

> It IS built there. Or was at least. Did they ever manage to sell any
> sensible quantity of them ? I've been trying to find numbers for ages
> without much luck. It bombed on launch and hasn't been much seen
> since.

I seem to recall reading that they've sold less than 40 in the UK - all
ones which have been kicking about since the 2006 launch - and are quietly
dropping it.
Eeyore - 30 Sep 2007 17:55 GMT
> >> That doesn't make sense? I have heard that the Saab based Cadillac
> >> BLS will be build in Trollhatten.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ones which have been kicking about since the 2006 launch - and are quietly
> dropping it.

I just read they've introduced a 'wagon' version.
http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/archives/2007/03/bls_wagon_annou.html

Elsewhere another article said Cadillac sold 2000 'units' in Europe last year.
It wasn't clear if that was all models though.

Graham
Ric - 07 Oct 2007 10:56 GMT
> Latest Saab 9-3 retains distinctive personality, performance at
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070921/AUTO/109210035/1009

Shame they didn't build it as a hatchback.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.