I think it's more than just one. The company that owned that dealership
in LIC also owned some in the Bronx and elseweher in Queens. I'll bet
those are gone too.
what's up with Saturn? Are they going the way of the Oldsmobile? GM is
really doing badly and I'll bet Saturn is suffering form the effects of
that.
I think GM missed the boat on building Hybrids. I think those are the
way of the future. Toyota seems to be doing well with them.
I like my 97SC2 a lot but I would have to think twice about buying
another Saturn if the dealerships are closing down. Also, I would like
my next car to be a hybrid. 60mpg is hard to turn down.
> I think it's more than just one. The company that owned that dealership
> in LIC also owned some in the Bronx and elseweher in Queens. I'll bet
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> really doing badly and I'll bet Saturn is suffering form the effects of
> that.
GM's is going about some assnine way of shaking up the unions. A 130+
billion dollar company doesnt simply vanish. What they need is
employee's to start paying a copay when they see a doctor etc. You wont
believe how badly GM's benefits get ripped off everytime a GM employee
sets foot in a hospital.
> I think GM missed the boat on building Hybrids. I think those are the
> way of the future. Toyota seems to be doing well with them.
The way of the future to screw you over. 2 totally different systems
crammed into already cramped vehicles. Oh yeah sure I'll work on them,
the question is are you ready to pay out the a.s for them?
> I like my 97SC2 a lot but I would have to think twice about buying
> another Saturn if the dealerships are closing down. Also, I would like
> my next car to be a hybrid. 60mpg is hard to turn down.
The EPA ratings don't exceed 55mph. Hybrid motors do not operate above
55mph. Once you get on the highway and do real highway speeds in a
vehicle thats now 1000 pounds heavier you can kiss those epa numbers
good bye.
Compair any hybrid to its gas only counterpart. On average you would
have to drive 100,000 MILES before you even start saving the price
difference with gas at $3 dollars a gallon. The whole point behind
saving gas is to "save money". Not to save gas. Why no one see's this
point is beyond me. I'll say again, the point behind good gas mileage is
to save money, brand new hybrids sure as hell wont save you a dime. If
you want to save money and get good gas mileage as well, buy a Feiro.
I've seen super looking Feiro's for under a grand. Think of the money
that could be saved!!! You can drive a million miles on those savings!
. . .
Ethanol, Hydrogen, and displacement on demand, those are the future...
satyr - 29 Mar 2006 03:14 GMT
>GM's is going about some assnine way of shaking up the unions. A 130+
>billion dollar company doesnt simply vanish.
And a ship the size of the Titanic could never sink.
GM has a market cap of about $13B, about the same as Campbell Soup. GM
is a $22 dollar stock that lost $15/share last year. They have huge
debt and are now paying big time interest due to their junk bond
credit rating. If this is a master plan to save money by eliminating
debt through bankruptcy, they are right on course.
> What they need is
>employee's to start paying a copay when they see a doctor etc. You wont
>believe how badly GM's benefits get ripped off everytime a GM employee
>sets foot in a hospital.
If I was in charge of GM I would put all of my diminishing political
sway behind universal health care. Might not be enough to save you
but at least you would be fondly remembered.
I was just looking at the April Consumer Reports - not one domestic car
in their Top 10 picks! First time that has happened. The "Big 3"
better smarten up real quick. I know people who said PanAm couldn't go
under. There was also a "dollars & sense" analysis of hybrids in this
issue. You will NOT be buying a hybrid after reading this article. And
don't be holding your breath for those fuel cell vehicles. Re: Saturn
- we still have three S-series in the family - I don't think they are
building them that well anymore. If you look at the Consumer's
reliability ratings, Saturns have many more black spots than the
Japmobiles. If they do away with the polymer body panels I won't have
any reason to buy another Saturn. And trying to bring Saturn back into
the "fold" was a VERY bad idea. (Note: Saturn of Sunrise did NOT move
to Massapequa.)
Mark T.B. Carroll - 29 Mar 2006 03:09 GMT
> I was just looking at the April Consumer Reports - not one domestic car
> in their Top 10 picks! First time that has happened. The "Big 3"
> better smarten up real quick. I know people who said PanAm couldn't go
> under. There was also a "dollars & sense" analysis of hybrids in this
> issue. You will NOT be buying a hybrid after reading this article.
To counterbalance that, 2 of CR's 10 top picks were hybrids - the Toyota
Prius and Highlander Hybrid. And, in the printed magazine issue, they
got the math wrong in that analysis by figuring depreciation in twice or
something. On the website you'll see they've corrected it.
> And don't be holding your breath for those fuel cell vehicles. Re:
> Saturn - we still have three S-series in the family - I don't think
> they are building them that well anymore. If you look at the
> Consumer's reliability ratings, Saturns have many more black spots
> than the Japmobiles.
(snip)
Yes - I think some older ones still come out as reasonable used cars,
like our '98 SW2, but current Saturns seemed to do pretty unimpressively
against the competition from CR's point of view. No doubt there'll be
plenty of people disagreeing, though.
-- Mark
Chuck - 29 Mar 2006 03:50 GMT
Mark writes:
>And, in the printed magazine issue, they got the math wrong in that analysis by figuring >depreciation in twice or something.
Even with the correction, most of the hybrids still leave you in the
"red" after 5 years.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/new-cars/high-cost-of-hybrid-vehicles-40
6/hybrids-vs-all-gas.htm?resultPageIndex=1&resultIndex=1&searchTerm=Hybrids
And the ones that don't are virtually a "break-even" investment.
U.S. News has drawn the same conclusion . . .
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/050509/9hybrid.htm
I don't like buying a conventional vehicle at the beginning of a new
model year because of the wrinkles that aren't ironed out yet. I think
it will be at least 10 years before I have enough confidence in hybrids
to take the plunge. And they better be better than a "break-even"
scenario by then.