 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Saturn Cars / August 200696 SL2 Maintenance Question
I have a low mileage 96 Saturn SL2 (23,000 miles). The belt(s) and hoses have never been replaced. I recently read a "Click and Clack" column about low mileage cars and they suggested that belts and hoses are some of the items on low mileage that need to be replaced due to possible ozone damage. Anybody agree, disagree? Any ideas of how much replacing the timing belt would cost if I brought the car in? Thanks. I've got an '96 SL with 140K miles on it and it still has all the original hoses. This car has spent its whole life in the extreme heat of the Arizona desert. Don't waste your money, just inspect them regularly. The original hoses seem to be very high quality. The Saturn does not have a timing belt, it has a chain that does not need replacement. The only belt is the serpentine belt that drives the water pump, alternator, A/C, etc. I replaced it at 100K, although it looked fine. >I have a low mileage 96 Saturn SL2 (23,000 miles). The belt(s) and hoses >have never been replaced. I recently read a "Click and Clack" column about >low mileage cars and they suggested that belts and hoses are some of the >items on low mileage that need to be replaced due to possible ozone damage. >Anybody agree, disagree? Any ideas of how much replacing the timing belt >would cost if I brought the car in? Thanks. >The Saturn does not have a timing belt, it has a chain that does not >need replacement. While it is true that it has a chain, they can indeed wear out and/or have tensioners go bad and if it does it is a interferance engine and you will have a very bad day when it fails. No proble with one at 23K but with 140K, I would at least inspect it soon. ----------------- TheSnoMan.com >While it is true that it has a chain, they can indeed wear out and/or >have tensioners go bad and if it does it is a interferance engine and >you will have a very bad day when it fails. No proble with one at 23K >but with 140K, I would at least inspect it soon. >----------------- >TheSnoMan.com True, I didn't mean the chain would last forever, just a lot longer than a belt. Thats one of the reasons I chose the Saturn over Toyota or Nissan. I'm at a quandry now on the '96 coming up on 150K. The car is worth maybe a grand and a half at best, even though it runs great. I wonder if I should just keed doing my oil changes and nothing else until something major lets go, and then scrap it. If I spend a hundred here and a few hundred there for things like timing chain inspection, I wonder if the extra miles it may get me would be worth it. If my luck holds out, I may get 200K without any expense other than basic maint. . At this point, I'm not going to do any major work myself. I'll change a radiator, water pump, or alternator, but not a clutch or timing chain. With what shops charge for work and parts now, I could see a repair costing half the value of the car, and with no guarentee something else won't let go soon after that. Damn, and they don't make new ones like this anymore....................................... > I'm at a quandry now on the '96 coming up on 150K. The car is worth >maybe a grand and a half at best, even though it runs great. I [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Damn, and they don't make new ones like this >anymore....................................... Some of those older Saturns are really tuff cookies and 200K is nothing on them. If it runs welll I would keep maintainance up and change tranny every 30K (now if never done) and change engine oil every 3K or less now too. It is no hard to pull upper cover to see if chain is still in good shape. ALso for what it is worth, I got 190K out of the original timing belt on a toyota once and it did not break either and would ahve gone a bit longer and timing belts generally are a lot easiier and cheaper to change too. Gear drive cam shaft is the best if you can find them but not in a OHC engine. ----------------- TheSnoMan.com >I have a low mileage 96 Saturn SL2 (23,000 miles). The belt(s) and hoses >have never been replaced. I recently read a "Click and Clack" column about >low mileage cars and they suggested that belts and hoses are some of the >items on low mileage that need to be replaced due to possible ozone damage. >Anybody agree, disagree? Any ideas of how much replacing the timing belt >would cost if I brought the car in? Thanks. imho, Having had a 96 Saturn, and now a 97 Saturn, I would only replace items like belts and hoses as they need it. Meaning when I've identified a problem, like worn parts, or soft spots on the hoses. Just what I do... later, tom @ www.BlankHelp.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.