 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / February 2005'56 vs '57 GH
Interesting articles in 2/17 and 2/24 Old Cars. The author seems to like nessing with figures, though. Reminded me of apples and oranges. Ex-politician? On the way home today, saw three vehicles with burned0out brake lights. All three were the right-hand side. Must be the rain - haven't seen many of these for a while. KDH > Interesting articles in 2/17 and 2/24 Old Cars. > The author seems to like nessing with figures, though. > Reminded me of apples and oranges. > Ex-politician? What was his consensus .......... let me guess 56 too nose heavy 57 hard to see over the hump/bulge on hood 56 too nose heavy but very fast in a straight line 57 not nose heavy, better steering, but can't see front of cat 56 too nose heavy, fins are fiberglass 57 Improved road handling fins too big bg All he does is attampt to refute the reputation for ill handling the '56 has. I'll leave it up to each to judge the validity of his arguement, never had both, nor neither, either new or old. I have no leaning on this subject, nor never expect to be qualified to have one. Wonder what Fred Phun (Puhn?) could do to either or both. Of course, that 2would be cheating. KDH |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.