Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OT - Windoze XP question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gordon Richmond - 15 Apr 2005 17:48 GMT
Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
use for work.

Has anybody here done an install of XP over Win98 in an existing
computer? Any pitfalls to watch for?

Do the current install discs for XP include the latest service packs,
or does one still have to go to the MS website right away to patch the
damn thing?

Gord Richmond
Studeman - 15 Apr 2005 18:02 GMT
I don't think you can install XP "over" Win98. Win 98 is Fat32, and XP
works better using the NT file system... (though I see you have a
choice) I would back up all my data to CDs, and then format the
harddrive. I don't like how XP formats, so I use a Win98 boot disk to
get to a DOS prompt (a:).. "Then type FORMAT C: /u" there is a space
between FORMAT and C:, and another space between C: and /u. What this
switch is- an UNCONDITIONAL FORMAT of c-drive. This wipes the drive
perfectly clean. Then I'll run FDISK to partition the harddrive. I'm
used to doing it, but the WinXP disk also allows you to create
partitions. Once they are created, and "C" drive is made active.. you
can format the drive to NT File System.. and continue to load XP.

I like to partition the drive at least 25% or over 5GB. This is usually
enough space to totally back-up the C-Drive, in case you have to
re-format. You can just drag/drop all the files into "D-Drive"(very
fast), then format C again, and reload your programs.

XP will need updating IMMEDIATELY.

Ray

> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Lee Aanderud - 15 Apr 2005 18:08 GMT
I would just back up my files, and do a clean install of XP... alot less
hassles that way.  Make sure your PC can handle XP, it's alot bigger and
more of a memory hog than 98.  I wouldn't attempt to run it with anything
less than 256MB of RAM... I'd recommend a minimum of 512MB.  If you haven't
rebuilt your PC since running 98, it's probably time to do a fresh install
of the operating system and any programs you're using... kind of a rule of
thumb I go by is to do a clean install every 2-3 years.

If you get a new version of XP it will probably come with Service Pack 2, if
not you'll have to download it from their website.  Hope you have high-speed
internet access because this will take a week to download over a modem.  You
could always have someone download it and burn it to a CD for you.

Lee

> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Rick Courtier - 15 Apr 2005 18:13 GMT
If you are networking specially with a server. . . do not get XP Home
version. . . because you will have to up grade again to XP Professional for
networking and other capabilities and for another $200 bucks it's cheaper to
do it all at once.  And watch and make sure check for updates for your
drivers so they work on XP Pro service pack 2.

Rick Courtier

> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Paul Johnson - 15 Apr 2005 18:42 GMT
> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or does one still have to go to the MS website right away to patch the
> damn thing?

Haven't done the XP over 98SE, but my son did with no problems.  If you
don't get Service Pack 2 with your upgrade, I recommend going to the MS
website and ordering SP2 on a CD.  It is a long download, especially if you
are on dial-up.  With the CD you can install it quickly and easily.  I like
XP much better than 98SE.  It is more forgiving and is sort of self-healing
(no more blue screen error messages).  SP2 gives you a firewall and
anti-pop-up.  It can be a little bothersome at times, but (knock on wood), I
haven't had any problems with it.  98SE wasn't bad, but ME was horrible.
Paul Johnson
Studeman - 15 Apr 2005 18:50 GMT
Also be aware that some older programs will NOT work with XP. Some older
Hardware won't either.. Things like scanners, printers, etc.. sometimes
won't work, and they don't have drivers written for XP from the
manufacturers.

Ray

> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Jeff Rice - 15 Apr 2005 21:30 GMT
Just make sure to run the compatibility program...and pay attention to it.
I like XP a lot.... It works ok. Updates too (automatic).
When I mork it up, I 'system restore' to a few days earlier, and read up on
my screw-up <g>..
And make sure you back up your Outlook Express mailbox address book.
Jeff (Mine disappeared, losing tens of thousands of useless e-mail addresses
<lol>) Rice

"Studeman" wrote:..
> Also be aware that some older programs will NOT work with XP. Some older
> Hardware won't either.. Things like scanners, printers, etc.. sometimes
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Gord Richmond
Ron  Butts - 15 Apr 2005 22:37 GMT
Jeff
How do get spell check to work in Outlook Express with Microsoft Works using
XP operating system???  I was told it ain't gonna happen.  Is this true??
Ron

> Just make sure to run the compatibility program...and pay attention to it.
> I like XP a lot.... It works ok. Updates too (automatic).
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>
>>> Gord Richmond
Lee Aanderud - 15 Apr 2005 22:49 GMT
Click on the Spell Check button.

Lee

> Jeff
> How do get spell check to work in Outlook Express with Microsoft Works
> using XP operating system???  I was told it ain't gonna happen.  Is this
> true??
> Ron
Jeff Rice - 15 Apr 2005 23:01 GMT
I have MS Word Professional, so it must have something different than
Works...
Jeff (Works is the Scotsman of the Microsoft world <g>) Rice

"Ron Butts" wrotet...
> Jeff
> How do get spell check to work in Outlook Express with Microsoft Works
> using XP operating system???  I was told it ain't gonna happen.  Is this
> true??
> Ron

> "Jeff Rice" wrote...
>> Just make sure to run the compatibility program...and pay attention to
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Gord Richmond
Jeff DeWitt - 15 Apr 2005 23:16 GMT
I believe the spell check in Outlook Express uses the spell checker
built into Word, so if you don't have Word the spell checker won't work.

Jeff DeWitt

Ron Butts wrote:
> Jeff
> How do get spell check to work in Outlook Express with Microsoft Works using
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>>>
>>>>Gord Richmond
Gordon Richmond - 16 Apr 2005 03:06 GMT
Jeff,

I don't use OE or IE. They won't last any longer than it takes me to
toast them out of the new install.

Gord Richmond
Mark Dunning - 19 Apr 2005 20:05 GMT
Unless the hardware is recent vintage, I would just buy a another box w/
current guts.
Time spent boinking around trying to mix new OS with old hardware is not
time well spent IMHO.

Mark (Picky about how I waste my time) Dunning

> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Bill Glass - 20 Apr 2005 03:37 GMT
>>Has anybody here done an install of XP over Win98 in an existing
>>computer? Any pitfalls to watch for?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>>Gord Richmond

We "tried" it, but computer ( four yrs
old) was too old for XP,  not enough HD
space, which could be fixed, wrong
processor which could not be fixed, and
some other problems..

Bill
Gordon Richmond - 20 Apr 2005 07:49 GMT
Mark,

Hardware is newer than Win XP by a couple of years. AMD Duron 2.1 GHz
processor, and 512 Meg RAM, 40 Gig HD.

I got the XP disc today. I'm going to install a second HD, backup the
old OS and all programs and data to it, so as to have a clone drive,
and then install XP OVER the Win 98 in ONE of the drives. If it
doesn't install cleanly, I can format the drive, and do an install
from square one. Either way, I have protected my present OS and data.

Gord Richmond
Studeman - 20 Apr 2005 15:06 GMT
Gord,
XP supports Dual-Boot. I would get a new Harddrive as they have come
down alot in price, Make the new drive the "Master" and set your old
drive to "Slave". Then install XP to the new drive. You can load
whatever programs you wish on the new drive, and then remove them from
the slave drive. You can keep all your data on the old drive-just in case-

When you boot the machine, it will ask you what drive to boot to...but
will default to the XP drive if you don't push any buttons.

Ray

> Mark,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Jerry Forrester - 20 Apr 2005 16:26 GMT
Since you guys have pissed Studegary off and he hasn't been here since
February to correct all our spelling, I want to take this opportunity to
say. There's no such word as 'ALOT'. That's two words, quit joining them
together. <G>

Signature

thanks,
Jerry Forrester

remove 'no spam' to respond

> Gord,
> XP supports Dual-Boot. I would get a new Harddrive as they have come
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> >
> > Gord Richmond
Lee Aanderud - 20 Apr 2005 17:21 GMT
Thanks alot Jerry.

Lee
> Since you guys have pissed Studegary off and he hasn't been here since
> February to correct all our spelling, I want to take this opportunity to
> say. There's no such word as 'ALOT'. That's two words, quit joining them
> together. <G>
Jerry Forrester - 20 Apr 2005 17:36 GMT
jus doin my part. <G>

Signature

thanks,
Jerry Forrester

remove 'no spam' to respond

> Thanks alot Jerry.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > say. There's no such word as 'ALOT'. That's two words, quit joining them
> > together. <G>
--Shiva-- - 20 Apr 2005 22:06 GMT
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:49:58 GMT,  you wrote:

>I got the XP disc today. I'm going to install a second HD, backup the
>old OS and all programs and data to it, so as to have a clone drive,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Gord Richmond
if you got a FULL XP, and not the UPDATE, dont even bother,
erase, format and reload..
the problem seems to come in 'later'.. then you will end up
reloading AGAIN.

    --Shiva--
   
   
Paul Johnson - 22 Apr 2005 19:21 GMT
> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or does one still have to go to the MS website right away to patch the
> damn thing?

Haven't done the XP over 98SE, but my son did with no problems.  If you
don't get Service Pack 2 with your upgrade, I recommend going to the MS
website and ordering SP2 on a CD.  It is a long download, especially if you
are on dial-up.  With the CD you can install it quickly and easily.  I like
XP much better than 98SE.  It is more forgiving and is sort of self-healing
(no more blue screen error messages).  SP2 gives you a firewall and
anti-pop-up.  It can be a little bothersome at times, but (knock on wood), I
haven't had any problems with it.  98SE wasn't bad, but ME was horrible.
Paul Johnson
Jeff DeWitt - 30 Apr 2005 05:46 GMT
I put SP2 on my debranded HP with XP-Home and the thing basically went
to Hell.  It would freeze up, reboot with no warning, and just generally
behave very badly.  I uninstalled SP2 and it started working just fine
again.

One of Microsofts recommendations is that your systems BIOS be at the
latest level, and I expect mine is not but since it's  debranded that
makes flashing it a challenge.

Jeff DeWitt

>>Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
>>accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> haven't had any problems with it.  98SE wasn't bad, but ME was horrible.
> Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson - 22 Apr 2005 19:21 GMT
> Sounds like I will have to "upgrade" to Windows XP in order to
> accomodate changes in a database/comms program that I am required to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or does one still have to go to the MS website right away to patch the
> damn thing?

Haven't done the XP over 98SE, but my son did with no problems.  If you
don't get Service Pack 2 with your upgrade, I recommend going to the MS
website and ordering SP2 on a CD.  It is a long download, especially if you
are on dial-up.  With the CD you can install it quickly and easily.  I like
XP much better than 98SE.  It is more forgiving and is sort of self-healing
(no more blue screen error messages).  SP2 gives you a firewall and
anti-pop-up.  It can be a little bothersome at times, but (knock on wood), I
haven't had any problems with it.  98SE wasn't bad, but ME was horrible.
Paul Johnson
Gordon Richmond - 23 Apr 2005 05:44 GMT
Well,
I got the disc the other day; XP pro, with SP2 included. Since XP is
supposed to support dual boot, I decided to install it on a brand new
40 gig hard drive I had on hand. Would not install; it could not
access the drive. Tried several times.

Took the XP CD out, and tried using an old Win98 boot disc to access
the drive and partition it by using DOS. No joy, it could not access
the drive. Didn't matter how I set the jumper, either.

So, I tried the drive in an old P233 box I have here. Again, the boot
disc could partition the drive using the FDISK command from the DOS
prompt.

I'm pretty certain I have a bad drive, brand new in the box. GRRRR!

Gord Richmond
Dan White - 23 Apr 2005 13:03 GMT
Perhaps you guys should just suck it up and buy and Mac mini for $499
and be done with these problems!

Signature

Dan White
'64 R1
'64 R2
'55 E38

Gordon Richmond - 23 Apr 2005 16:00 GMT
Mac is not an option.

The software that I have to use for work simply does not come in a Mac
version, and it's several programs, not just one.

Gord Richmond
Dan White - 23 Apr 2005 16:26 GMT
Microsoft makes an emulator, Virtual PC that lets you run Windows on a
Mac.  It might work for what you do.

Signature

Dan White
'64 R1
'64 R2
'55 E38

Lee Aanderud - 23 Apr 2005 17:05 GMT
Yes, an emulator will run... but so will buying a screwdriver, grinding the
blade down to an edge and then using it as a chisel... why not just buy a
chisel in the first place?

Lee

> Microsoft makes an emulator, Virtual PC that lets you run Windows on a
> Mac.  It might work for what you do.
Jeff DeWitt - 30 Apr 2005 05:38 GMT
Neat little box, and I hope Apple sells a bunch of them, but it's still
not a lot of computer for $500 compared to the PC you can buy for the
same money.

Jeff DeWitt

> Perhaps you guys should just suck it up and buy and Mac mini for $499
> and be done with these problems!
Dan White - 30 Apr 2005 12:33 GMT
Depends on what you want.   Ease of use, no viruses or spyware,
reliablity.............!  Some of the reviews have shown it can hold
its own.  I have a Mac server running in my office that has been
running non-stop for 10 years.

Signature

Dan White
'64 R1
'64 R2
'55 E38

Jeff DeWitt - 30 Apr 2005 17:51 GMT
I'm not going to get into the Mac/PC argument, like I say I hope Apple
sells a boatload of those things, the best thing that could happen for
Windows is some good competition.  It's just that when people buy one of
those units they need to understand what they are getting, and it's
going to need things a $500 PC would already have.

Jeff DeWitt

> Depends on what you want.   Ease of use, no viruses or spyware,
> reliablity.............!  Some of the reviews have shown it can hold its
> own.  I have a Mac server running in my office that has been running
> non-stop for 10 years.
--Shiva-- - 24 Apr 2005 03:36 GMT
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 04:44:15 GMT,  you wrote:

>I'm pretty certain I have a bad drive, brand new in the box. GRRRR!
>
>Gord Richmond
was it a WD?

    --Shiva--
   
   
Gordon Richmond - 24 Apr 2005 07:48 GMT
Seagate, actually.

I bought it months ago, and never installed it. It will be interesting
to see what happens when I take it back to the dealer. <G>

Gord Richmond
--Shiva-- - 24 Apr 2005 15:50 GMT
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 06:48:26 GMT,  you wrote:

>Seagate, actually.
>
>I bought it months ago, and never installed it. It will be interesting
>to see what happens when I take it back to the dealer. <G>
>
>Gord Richmond
friend had a WD that several people tried to format for him-it
refused..played with it for 3 months before it took..

    --Shiva--
   
   
Studeman - 24 Apr 2005 16:34 GMT
Gord,
How "old" is the drive that is in the machine? If it's more than
3-years, it probably uses a 40-thread HD cable instead of the newer 80.
The 2 aren't compatable.
I haven't tried using an older HD with the newer cable.
Try switching the HD cable in the machine, with the one that came with
the new HD.

Ray

> Well,
> I got the disc the other day; XP pro, with SP2 included. Since XP is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Gord Richmond
Gordon Richmond - 25 Apr 2005 15:55 GMT
The new HD has only a 40-pin socket for the ribbon cable, same as the
old one.

Computer "sees" the drive, but cannot access it.

Gord Richmond
Studeman - 25 Apr 2005 22:55 GMT
The socket IS the same... the cable isn't.. I don't know what the
difference is... or how your computer tells them apart...

Ray

> The new HD has only a 40-pin socket for the ribbon cable, same as the
> old one.
>
> Computer "sees" the drive, but cannot access it.
>
> Gord Richmond
--Shiva-- - 26 Apr 2005 00:03 GMT
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:55:16 GMT,  you wrote:

>The socket IS the same... the cable isn't.. I don't know what the
>difference is... or how your computer tells them apart...
>
>Ray
40 wires vs 80 wires in the cable..

    --Shiva--
   
   
Gordon Richmond - 26 Apr 2005 08:18 GMT
Looks like I have the 80-thread cable in my PC. It has a gray plug
(slave) and a black plug (master).

But the problem WAS apparently a bad drive. Took it into the shop
where I bought it, and they couldn't get it working either. So they
swapped straight across for an 80 GB drive. Can't fault their customer
service one bit!

Gord Richmond
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.