Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Who wants to attempt

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Georgia Studebaker - 27 Aug 2005 22:40 GMT
to educate this ebay rookie?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Studebaker-1960-Lark-Excellant-Overall-Conditon_W
0QQitemZ4571734583QQcategoryZ6466QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


Dave Miller
Webmaster & Chaplain
So. Ga. SDC
http://www.georgiastudebaker.com
64daytonaht - 27 Aug 2005 22:49 GMT
Didn't do a bit of good.  He thinks the car is worth a fortune and it's
about the only one left.  Love that V6 engine, don't you?

Bo
Georgia Studebaker - 27 Aug 2005 22:54 GMT
It said "V" six????

HA!

That show illustrates the lack of knowledge some have,
and the evolution of car engines.

I'd guess that there were NO V-6 blocks until the 80s.

No there are NO straight-6 block that I can think of.
Although GM DOES build a straight 5 cylinder, right?

Dave
Paul Johnson - 27 Aug 2005 23:07 GMT
> It said "V" six????
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I'd guess that there were NO V-6 blocks until the 80s.

Actually, GMC had a V-6 in the "60s (sometime) and Jeep used one in their
second generation Jeepsters in the '60s.  I think there were others, but I
can't think of them right off hand.

> No there are NO straight-6 block that I can think of.
> Although GM DOES build a straight 5 cylinder, right?

The straight five is an offshoot of the in-line six they developed for the
GMC Encore in 2002 (still base engine- pretty neat with dohc, variable valve
timing, something like 270 hp from 4.2 liters).  BMW and Volvo also offer
straight sixes.
Paul Johnson
kelmbaker@msn.com - 27 Aug 2005 23:22 GMT
I believe the Buick V-6 WAS the Jeep V-6. I had a '65 Buick Wagon with
a V-6. Think they came out shortly before that. The old GMC "jimmy
popper" 304 V-6 came out in the early sixties. What a hunk of......
transtar60 - 27 Aug 2005 23:28 GMT
The Buick V6 was the Jeep V6. GM sold the tooling to Kaiser Jeep in
65-66. Then after the gas crisis, GM bought it back. Jeep didnt really
need it since they had all the V8 and inline sixes they needed.

> I believe the Buick V-6 WAS the Jeep V-6. I had a '65 Buick Wagon with
> a V-6. Think they came out shortly before that. The old GMC "jimmy
> popper" 304 V-6 came out in the early sixties. What a hunk of......
hoxiepoo@cox.net - 28 Aug 2005 03:29 GMT
kelmbaker@msn.com wrote:
"I believe the Buick V-6 WAS the Jeep V-6. I had a '65 Buick Wagon with
a V-6. Think they came out shortly before that."

Yes, the Buick V6 had a long life (some of them were cast in aluminum -
nice & light). After all the US companies were done with it, the
tooling was sold to Rover - who needed a lightweight, powerful motor
for their overseas models.
kelmbaker@msn.com - 28 Aug 2005 04:37 GMT
Uhmm, I thought that was the 215 V-8???? The Buick V-6 is still very
much in production for GM. Current size is the 3.8. It was the engine,
Turbo'ed, in the Grand National. I think I remember it being a cut off
Buick V-8, but that is just a impression from a long ago article in a
Hot Rod mag, well might be faulty memory. The 215 was the engine
developed for Harley Earl's show car (Y-job, LeSabre, ???? What was
it?). I bet GM wishes they had it back. Great engine to swap into a
small car. Think a MGB with a V-8 and a four speed....
R W Hughes - 28 Aug 2005 07:09 GMT
> kelmbaker@msn.com wrote:
> "I believe the Buick V-6 WAS the Jeep V-6. I had a '65 Buick Wagon with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> tooling was sold to Rover - who needed a lightweight, powerful motor
> for their overseas models.

Actually Rover bought the aluminum V8(215 cu in), the V6 still exists in
much improved form as the 3800

Signature

Robert W. Hughes (Bob)
BackYard Engineering
29:40.237N, 95:28.726W or perhaps 30:55.265N, 95:20.590W
Houston, Texas "The city with too much Oxygen"
rwhughe@oplink.net

Nate Nagel - 28 Aug 2005 10:44 GMT
> kelmbaker@msn.com wrote:
> "I believe the Buick V-6 WAS the Jeep V-6. I had a '65 Buick Wagon with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> tooling was sold to Rover - who needed a lightweight, powerful motor
> for their overseas models.

No, that's the aluminum V-8 that preceded it.  The V-6 lives on to this
day (in revised and refined form) as the GM 3800, which is probably the
best engine they're making in terms of family hawlers.

Same engine also formed the base for the Buick Grand National/GNX and
Pontiac GTA, just so you know...

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Nate Nagel - 27 Aug 2005 23:24 GMT
>>It said "V" six????
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> straight sixes.
> Paul Johnson

ITYM "Envoy" - forgot about that one.

"Encore" was an even more forgettable Renault.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Paul Johnson - 28 Aug 2005 00:18 GMT
>> The straight five is an offshoot of the in-line six they developed for
>> the GMC Encore in 2002 (still base engine- pretty neat with dohc,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> "Encore" was an even more forgettable Renault.

Thanks.  I knew better- really (not the first time I have misused names on
the NG <G>).
Paul Johnson
Nate Nagel - 27 Aug 2005 23:23 GMT
> It said "V" six????
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I'd guess that there were NO V-6 blocks until the 80s.

Buick and GMC come to mind, but barring that you're mostly right.

> No there are NO straight-6 block that I can think of.
> Although GM DOES build a straight 5 cylinder, right?

BMW still builds 'em, as well as Nissan (Skyline - regrettably not sold
in the US) but sadly the rumored replacement for the Toyota Supra is
said to have a V-6.  Those are the only ones I can think of off the top
of my head.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

64daytonaht - 28 Aug 2005 07:33 GMT
No, actually the first and only Buick I ever owned in the early 70's had a
231 V6.  It lasted about 6 months.  Spun a main bearing at 55mph.  After the
hassles from GM, I've never bothered to buy another.

Bo

> It said "V" six????
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Dave
itsfrom Click - 28 Aug 2005 12:51 GMT
re:  US straight 6s still in production:  Jeep 4.0 as still used in the
Wrangler.....originally introduced as the Rambler Typhoon and variously
produced as a 232,199,258 and now 240.  main advantage (literally) of a
straight 6 besides inherent balance, is capability to use 7 main
bearings, like the Typhoon.......a good V6 is, what, 60 degrees to be in
balance?  and only 3 or 4 main bearings.

as said, the ubiquitous GM 3800 goes back to the Buick Special of  1964
(I think) and has little in common with the 215 aluminum v8.......that
was a nice little engine and a nice size for the GM compacts introduced
in '61, but too small  when they grew to mid-size for '64.....Buick was
introducing their 300 iron v8  (later 330 and 350 - a miniature
nailhead) and simply lopped 2 cylinders off for the v6.  it was a real
dog as it was a 90 degree block and woefully out of balance.....they had
engine mounts about a a half foot thick and made out of Jello to try and
absorb the shaking.  in later years, when they bought the tooling back
from Jeep they designed a multi-plane crankshaft to even out the firing.
the early ones even used the same distributor as the v8......with 2
blank spaces on the cap for the missing cylinders.......man did those
things shake!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.