Thanks, John. I haven't figured out how to patch over to the NG to or
from the Forum, so anybody that wants to read a brief report, follow
JP's link and then scroll down to the long entry toward the end, with
results posted. Cheers. BP
Or:
"Yes, Doug Tjapkes (easy to pronounce; the "T" is silent and everything
else sounds like you'd expect: JAP-kess) blew his R2 Hawk on his seventh
run. (I thought 7 was a lucky number?) He had been tickling the 14s,
too; getting as low as 15.026 early Saturday morning.
They pulled his Hawk onto the trailer at the far end of the track and
left without coming back to the pits for a post-mortem, so we don't know
for sure what happened. It did blow big-time: camshaft, rod, bearing,
and piston parts out through the oil pan and all over the track. Ouch!
On a happier note, Ted and The Plain Brown Wrapper posted a new low ET
for their performance at that event: 12.848 at 111.11 MPH! So did The
Tomato: 108.27 MPH, while matching Ted's previous low ET with the Tomato
up there: 13.301.
The BIG "improver" and the star of the show, in perspective, was Richard
Poe and his 1963 R1/4-speed Lark Custom 2-door. He astonished everyone
with a 14.354 ET right out of the box (first run) late Friday afternoon.
He came back shaking, "Geeze, how could I ever do that good again?"
(Remember, it was just last September that Richard finally broke into
the 14s after years of trying.)
Well, Richard came back Saturday morning and posted a 14.278, and then,
two runs later, a 14.353!!!! All of Richard's terminal speeds were
between 94.57 - 96.56 MPH; very consistent.
While doing "all the above," Richard beat the following cars in heads-up
drag racing: 1969 Hurst Olds 455, 1963 Corvette Fuel Injection, 1971
Mustang SCJ429, and a 1969 Rambler Scrambler...and remember, Richard's
car is an unsupercharged R1!! (In fairness to those competitors, Richard
beat some of them on Reaction Time; they turned lower ETs, but he had a
better reaction time and got to the end of the quarter-mile sooner, so
he won fair-and-square even though he had a higher ET. It's not the
lowest ET that wins a drag race; it's the car that gets to the end of
the quarter-mile first after the lights go green!)
We had seven Studebakers running: The Tomato, The Plain Brown Wrapper,
Peter Sant's R2 Avanti, Chuck Kern's R2 Avanti, John Raab's mostly R1
1963 Lark Regal 2-door, Richard Poe's 1963 Lark Custom R1 2-door, and
Doug Tjapkes' 1963 R2 Super Hawk. Everyone except Doug had a great time
and most posted a new record for their car one way or another...that is,
once the rain stopped mid-afternoon Friday and they could get the track
dried off for a couple hours' running on what should have been an 8-hour
practice day.
More later in Turning Wheels. BP
BP"
> Thanks, John. I haven't figured out how to patch over to the NG to or
> from the Forum, so anybody that wants to read a brief report, follow
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> http://studebakerdriversclub.com/sdc_forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1784

Signature
JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 4 speed Challenger (Plain Wrapper)
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
62 Lark 2 door
61 Hawk
60? Hawk
53 Starlight
63larkr1 - 18 Sep 2005 21:45 GMT
Thanks for the update Bob. I only have the time slips and not all the
notes Bob took.
Here is how some of my runs Bob gave you went. Bob can correct me if I
get it wrong.
I ran 14.354 at 95.95 to the 1969 H/O 455 Olds 14.314 at 95.71. Close
race but I got the win and had a better MPH.
The 1971 Ram Air Mustang SCJ429 was a win at the request of one of the
track workers. He asked me in the staging lanes to beat the Mustang so
I did. He had the better R/T by .09 but I ran 14.278 at 96.56 and won.
The 390 Scrambler was a good close race 14.353 to his 14.253 and I win
by .05. That's a half car length.
Each lane has its own timing and it's all about getting to the finish
line first. Bob works both days to make sure
he gets all the runs straight for all of us and I appreciate his hard
work, thanks Bob.
Richard
John Poulos - 18 Sep 2005 22:30 GMT
BTW, those numbers for a R1 are simply amazing. Never thought I'd see a
R1 in the low 14's, you did very well indeed.
> Thanks for the update Bob. I only have the time slips and not all the
> notes Bob took.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> work, thanks Bob.
> Richard

Signature
JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 4 speed Challenger (Plain Wrapper)
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
62 Lark 2 door
61 Hawk
60? Hawk
53 Starlight
Studedude - 18 Sep 2005 23:06 GMT
Horsepower Results - 1/4 Mile Method
Your Studebaker weighs about 3200 pounds and can complete a 1/4 mile in
about 14.278 seconds. That means that you've got about 217.29 HP at the
wheels, and about 282.47 HP at the flywheel.
I got this off
http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/horsepower_calculator.html. I
figured about 3200 lbs. with driver. I know my 64 Daytona weights 3350
without me, and my 63 Lark 2dr Sedan tips the scales at about 3000.
282 hp at the engine is pretty close to what an R1 engine should have,
in my opinion. The 240 hp put out by the factory is a joke when you
compare it to the standard 289 with 4bbl which put out 225. Some
magazines that tested the R1s before Studebaker released hp numbers
figured that it put out around 270 stock.
Nick
63larkr1 - 19 Sep 2005 00:01 GMT
Thank you. My R1 is 3640 with the driver. I'm about 210. My car has a
lot of undercoating. Yes the factory rating is not correct. I had to
use an Avanti drive shaft and that is bigger than the lark type. We had
to lower the transmission to make it clear. I needed a Yoke that I
damaged a few weeks ago at test and tune. I also damaged the bushing in
the back of the transmission, but had to run it that way with no time
to fix it.
Peter had some problems and didn't get to test before he came to the
race but did run a high 14 time. The track was slick and made for some
slower runs.
Richard
John Poulos - 19 Sep 2005 00:06 GMT
Cool, that means over 1 HP/cu.in.
> Thank you. My R1 is 3640 with the driver. I'm about 210. My car has a
> lot of undercoating. Yes the factory rating is not correct. I had to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> slower runs.
> Richard

Signature
JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 4 speed Challenger (Plain Wrapper)
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
62 Lark 2 door
61 Hawk
60? Hawk
53 Starlight