I wonder too, since the factory car was built at a local body shop.
> That's one of the best conversion I've seem, especially the folding top. I wonder if the retired Studeabker engineer story is true? Des anybody know the history of this car?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/b4hjw

Signature
JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 4 speed Challenger (Plain Wrapper)
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Daytona convert.
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
53 coupe rod.
From the looks of the door gaps the frame wasn't braced,but that could
still be done,she's probably a 'flexi-flyer' as is. I've done a couple
old brand-x convertibles with the same problem.
Sounds like a homebuilt...
It said "Built 'by' a retired Studebaker engineer'...
Shoot, it could have been built last year by a retired sanitary engineer
based on that claim.
Not poo-poo'ng it by any means, but if it were built by a real, live,
engineer....I'd be wondering how he addressed the body flex issue after
cutting off the top...short of welding the doors shut.
Jeff
"John Poulos" wrote...
>I wonder too, since the factory car was built at a local body shop.
>> That's one of the best conversion I've seem, especially the folding top.
>> I wonder if the retired Studeabker engineer story is true? Des anybody
>> know the history of this car?
>>>Finally!
>>>A GT Hawk that could take first place.............. (somewhere)
>>>And a convertible to boot!
>>><http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Studebaker-GT-Hawk-R1-4-Speed-1963-Studebaker-R1-
4-spd-Gran-Turismo-Hawk-Convertible_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ6466QQitemZ460508
7763QQrdZ1>
>>>or
>>>http://tinyurl.com/b4hjw
oneluv6up6up@yahoo.com - 16 Jan 2006 16:19 GMT
I knew of this hawk in california, not that long ago. Car is nice but
NOWHERE near a first place show winner. I remember a 1 inch gap in the
drivers door up top (bad bracing) an amateur paint job and so-so
interior. Chrome was fair,wheels old,etc. definately an old resto. Car
looks 10 times better on ebay....thats why I always need to see them in
person .
Mike Williams - 16 Jan 2006 16:49 GMT
I've been told that this blue 63 R1 GT convertible was done by the same guy
who did a Packard Hawk convertible that is now in TX. Guy's name is Stan
Pridachuk in WA. Both cars are painted this same Camaro blue. A Packard Hawk
owner in CA had this car fairly recently, he must have sold it to the
Lombard owner who is now trying to sell it. I understand both cars did have
some additional support added to the frames.
Mike W.
>I knew of this hawk in california, not that long ago. Car is nice but
> NOWHERE near a first place show winner. I remember a 1 inch gap in the
> drivers door up top (bad bracing) an amateur paint job and so-so
> interior. Chrome was fair,wheels old,etc. definately an old resto. Car
> looks 10 times better on ebay....thats why I always need to see them in
> person .
Steve Hudson - 16 Jan 2006 16:31 GMT
It's amazing how many of these I've run across that end up "garaged with
very few mile" after the conversion. Hopefully, this does have a
reinforced frame, but the mileage would suggest otherwise. I would
inspect (or have it inspected) before bidding. If it was done right, it
would be a bargain (as opposed to building yourself) at the "buy it now"
price.
The factory convertible is in a private collection in California now.
The owner is a "collector", and doesn't show it or any of his many other
cars. I think it may also have been a "flexi-flyer" and consequently
driven very little by Studebaker or the first owner either.
S2DSteve