Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

289 mods

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rustynutgarage - 28 Feb 2006 14:25 GMT
Try this again..............

I have a customer with a 289 pwrd 54 coupe. 4sp 3:31. He'd like to
possibly install a performance cam. I'm assuming stock compression,
motor is around a 61 model.
Stude alumin intake, 600cfm edelbrock, stock exhaust manifold.
My question is what are the options for the cam. R/1R2 reground. New??
How a bout the John Erb regrind, anyone have experince on this one??
Thanks for the help.
Russ
N8N - 28 Feb 2006 14:27 GMT
> Try this again..............
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks for the help.
> Russ

I'm told that the one that Ted Harbit was selling was basically a
reground cam to R1/R2 spec but with a slightly different lobe
separation angle and that it works really well in both an R-motor and a
stock 289.  I am ashamed to admit that I've had one for about a year
but have not installed it yet.

nate
jack767@highland.net - 28 Feb 2006 14:43 GMT
> Try this again..............
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks for the help.
> Russ

Russ,

I have been running one of Ted's R 1 / R 2 cams for about 70,000 miles
in my G T
Hawk.  It's a 5 speed with 8.6 : 1 compression , Carter 625 CFM, and
3.31 rear.

What do you need to know?  It's a good set up as far as I am concerned.
Low end torque seems only slightly affected and there's a good RPM
range - makes good power.
Idle quality is almost unaffected.   I have another of Ted's cams ready
to go into another
project.  This one has slightly more lift than the previous one and I
think it's his latest
offering. Haven't run this one yet.

Jack
rustynutgarage - 28 Feb 2006 15:07 GMT
I guess my question is how the motor is affected, and if the cam and
carb alone without any further mods ie compression ratio will it make
it a dog. A hot rod idle would be a good thing up  to a point.
Has anyone ran the John Erb cam?? If someone has John's phone # email
or post it for me
Thanks
Russ
Mike - 28 Feb 2006 17:17 GMT
Just for general information.

Depending on how much is willing to be spent, but a good three angle
valve grind with some proper port massaging goes a long way for both
performance and milage, in addition to the cam swap.

Mike
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.