Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

R1 Engine Rebuild

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 03:07 GMT
The R1 engine in my 63 Wagonaire sat around and froze up because the PO
did not take proper care and water was sitting in one of the cylinders
with the piston 2/3rds up.  Now the one cylinder is scored from the
corrosion.  I managed to clean it up and the engine turns ok.  I have
been told that if I try to put it back in I will most likely have a
smoky engine.

I am thinking about having the block bored .60 over which should give
me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
pistons for lower compression?
GTtim - 23 Aug 2006 03:12 GMT
Using the shallow dish or 'cup' pistons should get you a compression
ratio of about 9.2/1.
That's what we used in my R2.  It is also bored .060 over.
Tim K.

> The R1 engine in my 63 Wagonaire sat around and froze up because the PO
> did not take proper care and water was sitting in one of the cylinders
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> pistons for lower compression?
GTtim - 23 Aug 2006 03:13 GMT
Oh, and we also used the standard (not R2) heads.
Tim K.

> Using the shallow dish or 'cup' pistons should get you a compression
> ratio of about 9.2/1.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > pistons for lower compression?
Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 03:16 GMT
Where would you buy the pistons from?  I have been told some of the
newer ones are cheap (made in Taiwan)

> Oh, and we also used the standard (not R2) heads.
> Tim K.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > > me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > > pistons for lower compression?
GTtim - 23 Aug 2006 03:33 GMT
I got mine through Ted Harbit which is now Fairborn and I think they
were Silvalite or something like that.
Tim K.

> Where would you buy the pistons from?  I have been told some of the
> newer ones are cheap (made in Taiwan)
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > > > me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > > > pistons for lower compression?
GTtim - 23 Aug 2006 03:35 GMT
I got mine through Ted Harbit which is now Fairborn and I think they
were Silvalite or something like that.
Tim K.

> Where would you buy the pistons from?  I have been told some of the
> newer ones are cheap (made in Taiwan)
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > > > me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > > > pistons for lower compression?
GTtim - 23 Aug 2006 03:35 GMT
I got mine through Ted Harbit which is now Fairborn and I think they
were Silvalite or something like that.
Tim K.

> Where would you buy the pistons from?  I have been told some of the
> newer ones are cheap (made in Taiwan)
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > > > me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > > > pistons for lower compression?
John Poulos - 23 Aug 2006 03:38 GMT
R1 and R2 pistons are the same, it's the heads that are different.

> The R1 engine in my 63 Wagonaire sat around and froze up because the PO
> did not take proper care and water was sitting in one of the cylinders
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> pistons for lower compression?

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
65 Daytona Sports Sedan
64 Daytona HT
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk (Black)
63 R1 GT Hawk
63 Avanti R1
63 Avanti R2
63 Daytona convert
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
60 Lark Convert
51 Commander

Grumpy AuContraire - 23 Aug 2006 05:51 GMT
Aren't the R2 heads the same as the low compression truck heads?

JT

> R1 and R2 pistons are the same, it's the heads that are different.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> 60 Lark Convert
> 51 Commander
John Poulos - 23 Aug 2006 06:13 GMT
Pretty much. I must have bought 10 sets NOS from SASCO over the years,
cheaper then buying new guides and installing.

> Aren't the R2 heads the same as the low compression truck heads?
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>> 60 Lark Convert
>> 51 Commander

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
65 Daytona Sports Sedan
64 Daytona HT
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk (Black)
63 R1 GT Hawk
63 Avanti R1
63 Avanti R2
63 Daytona convert
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
60 Lark Convert
51 Commander

Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 12:51 GMT
Thanks John, I knew that about the pistons at one time but forgot they
are the same.  What compression ratio would I have on an R1 with the
thicker head gaskets and .60 over pistons?

> Pretty much. I must have bought 10 sets NOS from SASCO over the years,
> cheaper then buying new guides and installing.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> 60 Lark Convert
> 51 Commander
Paul Johnson - 23 Aug 2006 13:43 GMT
> The R1 engine in my 63 Wagonaire sat around and froze up because the PO
> did not take proper care and water was sitting in one of the cylinders
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> pistons for lower compression?

Years ago I bought a wrecked '64 Avanti R-1 for parts (for $150).  I had run
in to the PO who told me that the engine (factory short block) and new
Powershift had fewer than 1500 miles ).  The hood was gone as was the air
cleaner so it had been sitting out for some time with no rain protection.  I
pulled the  heads and found that all the cylinders were standing full of
water.  The cylinder walls were all rusted.  Back in those days boring
wasn't even considered (keep it cheap).  I had the car at a base auto hobby
shop.  The Filipino man running the shop told me to dry them out, then take
kerosene and steel wool and polish the cylinder walls.  I did that and they
cleaned up nicely.  I put the engine in my '64 Champ and ran it many
thousands of miles with no problem and no excessive oil consumption.
Eventually I traded the engine to JP for his '64 Daytona convertible which
is now owned by Jim Turner (via Skip Lackie and N8N).  About the same time
JP got me a Big A rebuilt ohv six long block.  I was going to use it in my
'61 convertible, but never got around to it.  Fast forward 25 years or so.
The engine had been sitting in my barn and had developed rust in the
cylinders.  I offered it to a man who needed it for the '63 Daytona
convertible he had.  I told him about the kerosene and steel wool trick and
told him to pay me for the engine only if it worked for him.  A few weeks
later he sent me a check and said it was sweet running.  JP eventually got
the car and resold it with no problems.
FWIW.
Paul Johnson
Joel - 23 Aug 2006 14:35 GMT
R1 and R2 pistons are the same, it is the heads that make the CR
difference. The R1 and R2 pistons are flattops (Silvolite 2412); there
is a "deep dish" piston - Silvolite 2411, and a shallow dish piston -
Silvolite 2416. There are some hypereutectic versions of some of these
pistons available, and yes, there are some import copies as well out there.

Joel

> The R1 engine in my 63 Wagonaire sat around and froze up because the PO
> did not take proper care and water was sitting in one of the cylinders
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> pistons for lower compression?
Joel - 23 Aug 2006 14:43 GMT
Mike,

I just tried to call you. I do have some of the Silvolite hypereutectics
available.

Joel

> R1 and R2 pistons are the same, it is the heads that make the CR
> difference. The R1 and R2 pistons are flattops (Silvolite 2412); there
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
>> pistons for lower compression?
Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 17:00 GMT
Thank you for the tip Paul. I am going to try that.  Did you use course
or fine steel wool?

Joel, I will get with you if this doesn't pan out.  Thank you!

> Mike,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> >> pistons for lower compression?
Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 17:10 GMT
Paul, did the R1 engine have pits in the cylinder wall?  Did the steel
wool and kersoine take the all the pits out or did you leave some?

> Thank you for the tip Paul. I am going to try that.  Did you use course
> or fine steel wool?
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> > >> me a 299 c.i. displacement.  What do you guys think about using R2
> > >> pistons for lower compression?
Paul Johnson - 23 Aug 2006 17:50 GMT
> Paul, did the R1 engine have pits in the cylinder wall?  Did the steel
> wool and kersoine take the all the pits out or did you leave some?

I think (but don't remember clearly from 1969) there were some small pits
that remained after cleaning in at least some of the cylinders in the R-1.
In the ohv six there were no pits.  I don't remember what grade steel wool I
used in the R-1, but I test cleaned some of the ohv using fine steel wool.
I think coarse would scratch the cylinder wall more than you would want.  I
didn't turn the R-1 until after I had cleaned what I could.  I put oil in
the cylinders and turned the engine to clean where the old water/rust line
couldn't be reached to complete the cleaning.
Paul Johnson
Michael - Roseland FL - 23 Aug 2006 18:23 GMT
I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

> > Paul, did the R1 engine have pits in the cylinder wall?  Did the steel
> > wool and kersoine take the all the pits out or did you leave some?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> couldn't be reached to complete the cleaning.
> Paul Johnson
Mike - 23 Aug 2006 19:52 GMT
> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

No....they won't !

First, you haven't taken .002" out "evenly" around the whole cylinder.
So the rings "might" expand "somewhat" into the bulge.

You have taken "SOME" amount, "unevenly" of a small spot somewhat
around the cylinder diameter.  Even if it does run for a short
period...my guess...about 2500 miles is where the rings will start
failing, and that's if you drive it easy!  Around 3000...smoke!

Mike
John Poulos - 23 Aug 2006 19:57 GMT
The fine steel wool takes virtually nothing off the bore, it just
take off the surface oxidation. IF the bores are not badly pitted, you
may never have a issue.

>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mike

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
65 Daytona Sports Sedan
64 Daytona HT
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk (Black)
63 R1 GT Hawk
63 Avanti R1
63 Avanti R2
63 Daytona convert
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
60 Lark Convert
51 Commander

Ron  Butts - 23 Aug 2006 22:04 GMT
In my opinon, it would be damn near impossible to remove .002 from a Stude
cylinder bore using fine steel wool.  .002 rust, yes, cylinder material, no.
Remember, high nickle steel content.

>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mike
Jeff Rice - 23 Aug 2006 23:10 GMT
I can't believe the shortcuts mentioned here.
Might as well pour beet juice in there and sing to it.
Doesn't anyone want to fix their Studebaker correctly anymore?
Or are we going to get the reputation for sawdust in the trans and bananas
in the rear end? <g>
After reading some of the stuff here, some will make a list of who not to
buy an engine (or car) from...
Jeff (I moved 7000+ pounds of Stude stuff today!) Rice

"Ron Butts" wrote...
> In my opinon, it would be damn near impossible to remove .002 from a Stude
> cylinder bore using fine steel wool.  .002 rust, yes, cylinder material,
> no. Remember, high nickle steel content.

>> No....they won't !
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> period...my guess...about 2500 miles is where the rings will start
>> failing, and that's if you drive it easy!  Around 3000...smoke!

>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Pat Drnec - 23 Aug 2006 23:20 GMT
I always put the bananas in the trans....

> I can't believe the shortcuts mentioned here.
> Might as well pour beet juice in there and sing to it.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

Remove the studebaker to email.

The only label that fits:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_6966.shtml

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by
the president or any other public official save exactly to the degree in
which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him
insofar as he  efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to
oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he
fails in his duty to stand by the country."

- President Theodore Roosevelt, 1908

1953 Starlight Coupe
1954 Starlight Coupe R1/4-speed
1958 Silver Hawk
1960 Frua Italia Larks (2 - they're here!)
1962 Lark VI
1962 Lark Convertible
1963 Avanti R2 R4324
1963 Lark Cruiser (R2 3/4 clone in progress)
1963 GT Hawk
1963 Daytona Wagonaire
1964 Cruiser (Survivor)
1954 3R11
1956 2E7
2004 Porsche Carrera 4S
2000 Ducati 748
2002 Jeep Overland
http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html

Jeff Rice - 24 Aug 2006 01:05 GMT
<g>
I'm just glad you still read my post's <lol>
Jeff

"Pat Drnec" wrote...
>I always put the bananas in the trans....

>> I can't believe the shortcuts mentioned here.
>> Might as well pour beet juice in there and sing to it.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Alex Magdaleno - 24 Aug 2006 04:46 GMT
Some people put the bananas in the rear end (:-)

>I always put the bananas in the trans....
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.
Michael - Roseland FL - 24 Aug 2006 05:19 GMT
Studebaker guys don't do that Alex.

> Some people put the bananas in the rear end (:-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> > 2002 Jeep Overland
> > http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html
oldcarfart - 24 Aug 2006 10:29 GMT
> Some people put the bananas in the rear end (:-)

Debbie does South Bend?
John Poulos - 24 Aug 2006 01:39 GMT
Jeff, since both of the NOS engines Paul mentioned passed through my
hands, I can tell you that him removing minor surface rust on those
engines at least worked out just fine.

eve the shortcuts mentioned here.
> Might as well pour beet juice in there and sing to it.
> Doesn't anyone want to fix their Studebaker correctly anymore?
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
65 Daytona Sports Sedan
64 Daytona HT
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk (Black)
63 R1 GT Hawk
63 Avanti R1
63 Avanti R2
63 Daytona convert
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
60 Lark Convert
51 Commander

Pat Drnec - 24 Aug 2006 02:17 GMT
Hmmm - doesn't sound like he spent nearly enough money on it. (I'm way
too susceptible to the 'as long as I'm in there' syndrome). <G>

BTW, got the 54 motor back together and put the R3 headers on with 2
1/2" duals into Flowmasters - damn, that thing sounds sweet!

>    Jeff, since both of the NOS engines Paul mentioned passed through my
> hands, I can tell you that him removing minor surface rust on those
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

Remove the studebaker to email.

The only label that fits:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_6966.shtml

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by
the president or any other public official save exactly to the degree in
which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him
insofar as he  efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to
oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he
fails in his duty to stand by the country."

- President Theodore Roosevelt, 1908

1953 Starlight Coupe
1954 Starlight Coupe R1/4-speed
1958 Silver Hawk
1960 Frua Italia Larks (2 - they're here!)
1962 Lark VI
1962 Lark Convertible
1963 Avanti R2 R4324
1963 Lark Cruiser (R2 3/4 clone in progress)
1963 GT Hawk
1963 Daytona Wagonaire
1964 Cruiser (Survivor)
1954 3R11
1956 2E7
2004 Porsche Carrera 4S
2000 Ducati 748
2002 Jeep Overland
http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html

Jeff Rice - 24 Aug 2006 02:46 GMT
Well OK, if you say so.....
But as a casual Stude enthusiast reading a forum on Studebaker repair,
maintenance, and (gasp) restoration,
I'd be suspicious of all the repair suggestions tossed casually out here for
all to read.
Jeff (once in print, it might become gospel..) Rice

"John Poulos" wrote..
>    Jeff, since both of the NOS engines Paul mentioned passed through my
> hands, I can tell you that him removing minor surface rust on those
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>>> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
>>>>> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Michael - Roseland FL - 24 Aug 2006 03:25 GMT
Why wait until SB Jeff?  The FL State Meet is in October in JAX.  I
just wasn't planning on driving the Avanti this time.

On the engine topic I am still exploring options and taking in
everyones feedback.  I don't want another R4 Avanti engine project
which easily cost me north of 10K.

This weekend I am going to pull the piston from the scored bore and
when I do take a close look at the wear on the bearings.  I am also
toying with the idea of having the scored cylinder sleeved if the
bearings are decent.  If the bearings are scored from wear I will have
the engine bored, new pistons, bearings etc.

> Well OK, if you say so.....
> But as a casual Stude enthusiast reading a forum on Studebaker repair,
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> > 60 Lark Convert
> > 51 Commander
Nate Nagel - 23 Aug 2006 23:26 GMT
> I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
> wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>couldn't be reached to complete the cleaning.
>>Paul Johnson

Need I even mention that if one uses steel wool anywhere inside an
engine, one should be sure to clean the bores THOROUGHLY before
reassembly...

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Michael - Roseland FL - 24 Aug 2006 00:07 GMT
Jeff Rice wrote:

"Doesn't anyone want to fix their Studebaker correctly anymore?"

Like what Jeff?  Putting a chevy engine in your Studebaker <G>  Hey,
look at it this way, if you tired cleaning a scored cylinder bore and
it didn't work out, as in worst case the engine smoked, have you really
caused any damage?  Could the engine not be pulled out and properly
bored?  This engine sat dead in my garage up until now and is at least
turning freely.  Saw dust in th tranny?  Hell no!!!

> > I guess if the cylinder wall was made slightly larger by the steel
> > wool, say .002" the rings would move out to make up for it.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
Jeff Rice - 24 Aug 2006 01:34 GMT
LOL...
OK, OK.. So you are an oatmeal guy <g>...
But don't castrate me because of my poor purchase decisions.
That '69 350 LT1 pink rod 4 bolt main T350 Z28 setup was in my CE when I
bought it.
I catch crap from the bow tie guys because that combo is worth a lot more in
a Camaro than in a Stude <lol>..
But I have a full flow 289 with a Meyers 200R4 adapter and a 200R4
(Calvintrans)
awaiting the day I blow the s#!t out of the SBC that was in the CE when I
bought it.
But I have to blow it up first...
Here's a double dog dare for you...
We can have a grudge race at SB 2007...
I will wind the living piss out of my SBC trying to catch your R4 clone.
I'll even add nitrous and tow the bitch home after I puke it on the drag
strip.
Then I'll break down and stuff that overweight Stude block into my CE <lol>
Jeff (starting drag racer wars early <boseg>) Rice

"Michael - Roseland FL"  wrote...
> Like what Jeff?  Putting a chevy engine in your Studebaker <G>  Hey,
> look at it this way, if you tired cleaning a scored cylinder bore and
> it didn't work out, as in worst case the engine smoked, have you really
> caused any damage?  Could the engine not be pulled out and properly
> bored?  This engine sat dead in my garage up until now and is at least
> turning freely.  Saw dust in th tranny?  Hell no!!!

> Jeff Rice wrote:
>
> "Doesn't anyone want to fix their Studebaker correctly anymore?"

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.