>>I don't know if they are still available but have you seen these?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> IIRC Ted Harbit sold (sells, still sells, did sell???) roller rockers
> and a bunch of other hi-tech stuff for Stude engines.
As a novice to high performance, I'm at a loss to see an advantage to
roller rockers... Now, a roller lifter would be far more interesting to
me given the fact that today's motor oils no longer carry the ingredient
that prevents/prevented excessive wear to lifters...
<sigh>
JT
oldcarfart - 28 May 2007 03:50 GMT
On May 27, 1:11�pm, Grumpy AuContraire <Gru...@ExtraGrumpyville.com>
wrote:
> >>I don't know if they are still available but have you seen these?
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
basically roller lifters roll on the camshaft lobes vs. standard
lifters sliding on a cam lobe. sliding = resistance, heat, friction,
consumes power due to sliding resistance, sorta like spit vs. KY
industrial lube <grin>
Freddy Badgett - 28 May 2007 05:21 GMT
> basically roller lifters roll on the camshaft lobes vs. standard
> lifters sliding on a cam lobe. sliding = resistance, heat, friction,
> consumes power due to sliding resistance, sorta like spit vs. KY
> industrial lube <grin>
Roller lifters allow a more extreme cam profile.Open valves quicker,
achieve max lift and stay there a bit, then ramp down quickly.Much
better breathing for the engine. A regular flat tappet cam cannot do
this,because the lifter would "dig" into the cam lobe at such quick
opening profiles.("Mushroom" lifters can do such quick ramps as well)
Grumpy AuContraire - 29 May 2007 02:30 GMT
> On May 27, 1:11�pm, Grumpy AuContraire <Gru...@ExtraGrumpyville.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> consumes power due to sliding resistance, sorta like spit vs. KY
> industrial lube <grin>
I understand that but what about the rockers? I can't see any advantage
there...
JT
Alex Magdaleno - 28 May 2007 06:53 GMT
There is some small saving in power loss using roller rockers. The advantage
come from another area though. With new rockers you can increase the ratio,
thus giving more lift for a given cam.You also can run a bigger cam and not
have the limitation of the stock rocker sliding off the valve with high
lift.
>>>I don't know if they are still available but have you seen these?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> JT
wbutler@mississippi.net - 29 May 2007 13:18 GMT
>As a novice to high performance, I'm at a loss to see an advantage to
>roller rockers... Now, a roller lifter would be far more interesting to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>JT
#1 reason to use roller rockers is to reduce or eliminate side loading
on the valves and guides thus reducing guide wear. The tip rolls
across the end of the valve rather than sliding (friction) across it.
The higher the lift the greater the benefit. Lamar
Grumpy AuContraire - 29 May 2007 15:31 GMT
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> across the end of the valve rather than sliding (friction) across it.
> The higher the lift the greater the benefit. Lamar
Ahhhh.... Thank You!
JT