Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

new direction for "allways a 1st time" thread??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ChampTruckingCompany - 07 Nov 2007 15:16 GMT
How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
slinging?Too much ill will?? Could it save one of us some grief???
What do you think? If the general consensus is this is a bad idea,I
can respect that.
I am NOT trolling with this post! But I would like to know who is a
stand up guy and who is a horses azz. And I am not talking about
personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.
Grumpy AuContraire - 07 Nov 2007 16:15 GMT
Well, I have been called a "horses a.s" and worse at times but not for
cheatin' anyone...

<G>

JT

>   How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.
i'm - 07 Nov 2007 17:01 GMT
>   How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.

I'd think there would be some wide eyes..............
Lee Aanderud - 07 Nov 2007 17:02 GMT
Why would you even want to do this... how about you ask about specific
vendors you're dealing with.  I have seen it done in other forums, but to
start asking people to bash other members is completely idiotic.  If you ask
about a specific member, what happens if you get 10 responses back 8
positive and 2 negative.  Would you deal with this member?  Take your
chances, if you don't feel comfortable don't deal with the person, stick
with Paypal or credit card payments that can be disputed.

Lee

>  How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mark Dunning - 07 Nov 2007 23:20 GMT
Sounds like a great way to stir up schitt un-necessarily.

Let sleeping doge lie there.

$.02 worth

Mark

>  How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.
blacklarkviii - 08 Nov 2007 00:09 GMT
I am afraid doing this would just about kill this group. We have a dwindling
audience as is, what would this do to us? ??????? I would like to know who I
can trust as much as anyone, but to make it a public issue, I don't know
about that.
Henry
> Sounds like a great way to stir up schitt un-necessarily.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----
JTlark63@yahoo.com - 08 Nov 2007 00:12 GMT
> Sounds like a great way to stir up schitt un-necessarily.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

when I first posted my thoughts I will say it was out of
disappointment that I was even in this situation, I am the most calm,
oh well kind of guy I know.... I was in business for 15 years and was
taken more times than I want ot remember...I always figured  that was
a part of life..I never took advantage of anyone.if someone felt they
had been...I made it right....I alway thought that was the way it
should be..I know not everyone thinks the same as I do....so I guess
this was a way of....venting.....I guess we will see what
happens........I respect everyones thoughts that are posting..Thanks
for listening
dwcars - 08 Nov 2007 00:08 GMT
I'm all for that idea.  If a guy is a scumbag, the world should know about
him.  If you've been burned by a scumbag, it is your obligation to tell all
of us who he is.  I  am assuming that the culprit has been given ample
opportunity to set things right before you F** him up!!

>  How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.
Lee Aanderud - 08 Nov 2007 00:41 GMT
Okay let's start with anybody who has ever dealt with you.

Lee

> I'm all for that idea.  If a guy is a scumbag, the world should know about
> him.  If you've been burned by a scumbag, it is your obligation to tell
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
>> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.
Karl Haas - 08 Nov 2007 02:04 GMT
On Nov 7, 7:16 am, ChampTruckingCompany <ChampTruck...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>   How about we ALL post our stories of how we have been snookered by
> someone in the Studebaker community? Would this lead to too much mud
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> personality conflicts,but actual buisness dealings that have gone
> south for whatever reason. I leave it to our community for discussion.

If TW is involved, you can ask the person who volunteered to try to
resolve disputes.
I don't know idf it's possible to check beforehand to see if someone
you are thinking of using has a good record with TW or not.

It might be worthwhile contacting a freind in the local chapter of
anyone you are think9ng of using, too.
Remember, sometimes people her what they want to hear when discussing
a sought-after item, too.
JTlark63@yahoo.com - 08 Nov 2007 02:12 GMT
> On Nov 7, 7:16 am, ChampTruckingCompany <ChampTruck...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Remember, sometimes people her what they want to hear when discussing
> a sought-after item, too.

the deal was made through this  swap page...and you are  correct ,I am
as fair game as the next guy, no argument here ..
ChampTruckingCompany - 08 Nov 2007 02:53 GMT
On Nov 7, 9:12 pm, JTlar...@yahoo.com wrote:

> > On Nov 7, 7:16 am, ChampTruckingCompany <ChampTruck...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> the deal was made through this  swap page...and you are  correct ,I am
> as fair game as the next guy, no argument here ..

OK,in hindsight I can see this might have not been a good idea. Having
been down the same road,I wondered if this was the same people causing
others grief.I SURE DO NOT want to muck up this NG. Having been around
since the days of "black helicopters" and such,I have noticed a
decline in the NG,which is disheartening.Like I said,this was not a
troll post,I just had the thought if we all knew who was scammin,we
all could avoid the buttmunch and the associated aggravation. So how
about instead of posting NEGATIVE stories,we post POSITIVE stories of
who of the private/evil vendors have done right by us? And if certain
names do not show up in the positive posts,you might get the hint they
are one of "them". Any better of an idea??
blacklarkviii - 08 Nov 2007 11:09 GMT
Champ you have a Champion of an idea there. Everyone has a chance to say
something positive about someone else. I can start this off.

All of us have dealt with Ted Harbit at one time or the other. I don't ever
remember anything bad being said about him. Well, to my opinion Ted did us
all a favor again when he sold his business to Phil. Phil continues to carry
the same Flag that Ted did . Thanks Ted for picking someone as good to work
with as you were.

Give Phil a double A+ from me.

Henry
> On Nov 7, 9:12 pm, JTlar...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> names do not show up in the positive posts,you might get the hint they
> are one of "them". Any better of an idea??
Brooksie - 08 Nov 2007 16:48 GMT
Amen to your choice of both Ted & Phil. I'll nominate Chuck Collins, Ed
Reynolds, John Myers & crew plus Dan & Betty Booth too!

Brooksie

> Champ you have a Champion of an idea there. Everyone has a chance to say
> something positive about someone else. I can start this off.
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>> names do not show up in the positive posts,you might get the hint they
>> are one of "them". Any better of an idea??
John Poulos - 08 Nov 2007 14:09 GMT
Most of the activity has moved to the SDC forums. I try and post to
both, but find I spend most of my time there now.
> OK,in hindsight I can see this might have not been a good idea. Having
> been down the same road,I wondered if this was the same people causing
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> names do not show up in the positive posts,you might get the hint they
> are one of "them". Any better of an idea??

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
58 Scotsman
53 Starliner
52 Starliner
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

gregscoggin@yahoo.com - 08 Nov 2007 03:17 GMT
On Nov 7, 6:12 pm, JTlar...@yahoo.com wrote:

> > On Nov 7, 7:16 am, ChampTruckingCompany <ChampTruck...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Here is the bottom line.  We have all worked with good folks and bad
folks over the years in the Studeclub.   I think we can all agree on
people who are easy to get along with and those who are not within our
club.  Those who are arrogant better than thou shmucks and those who
are down to earth and real.  Those who are condescending dic&weeds and
those who would drive 50 miles out to nowhere and help you tow your
broken down stude home.  I personally have I have had to deal with
more than my share of  weirdos, jerks and cantankerous old bastards in
this club over the last 25 years.  Anywhere ya go in life I you're
gonna meet people ya just don't like and who don't like you...I know
from personal experience I met folks who probably  thought I was a
pretty-boy-arrogant-loud mouth and I thought they were just good old-
fashioned-toothless-white-trashbag-no-social gracing-A$$Hoes.  Would
we have a beer with each other on a Friday night at the meet....Hell
No...point is we are all different and all human and just
misunderstand each other quite often or just don't chemically jive,
but hey we'll leave this to our shrinks and get down to slagging
people in the club....Do I do it...Yes, with my girl....with others,
NO, unless the person I am venting to is a good friend of mine that
I've known for a long time and we both agree the person is a cluster
of an a.shole.  Strange how often, it is unanimous and people all
agree to who the jerk is, ocassionally and more often than not, not
everyone agress on who the buttheads are..  Now, I have good buds in
the club who have loved a particular person they bought a part from
and I hated the guy....we had different experiences and very different
types of a rappport with that person.....and so the world keeps
turning.....But to PUBLICLY rag on a person because you don't like
them....just don't take our club down that road....we have always been
known to be the kind of club that needed to stick together more so
than other clubs just due to the scarcity of parts.....still there are
some exceptions.....if you've ever been done wrong and under a few
circumstanes:

Your are the buyer.
1.  You buy a part and it is substandard, misrepresented, not what you
ordered or simply didn't arrive in a timely ( ie within a month)
manner and
2.  The person who sold it to you won't replace the part for like,
won't refund your money or never contacts you back after your repeated
attempts to contact them when your part has not arrived then I think
it is fair game that after a month, crucify the bastard......
You are the seller:
1.  You send part but receive no payment (check bounces) and buyer
makes no attempt to rectify.
2.  You sell a used part and buyer breaks yer B*&LLS cause they
expected a new part when both of you know what you agreed upon.
Then crucify the bastard.

Point is where does subjective personal dislike end and bad business
practice begin and vice versa?  Thats a hard one to pinpoint.
Opinions are like A$$hoes...everyone's got one and they are
SUBJECTIVE.  That is why you don't publicly crucify bad apples, you
take their a.ses to court just on principal, even if they screwed you
over on a 50 cent part.  If I feel someone is taking me I'll spend
1000 bucks in court just on principal alone then I will advertise the
decision in the TW.  When you do this, you make their life so
miserable they'll wish they never did business with you.  In the end,
they'll think twice about repeating their abberant behaviour with
anyone else.  If this doesn't work, you steal their hubcaps at the
next meet and keep on doing it until they quit and join the Chevy
club.
My 2cents.....
64daytonaht - 08 Nov 2007 03:27 GMT
Thanks to the liberal left, we have a problem in this country with people
being held accountable for their actions.  Left unchecked,as it has, look
what a mess things are. What else may this individual do and get away with?
Who else might he pull this crap on?  Holding this individual accountable is
the right thing to do.  Speaking up about this sort of thing is the only way
we're ever going to even start fixing our problems.

Bo
ALEX M. - 08 Nov 2007 04:40 GMT
Yes, everything is the fault of the liberals. I'm sure glad they are not in
power to lie us into a war and spend us into bankruptcy, and ruin our
worldwide reputation. The dollar has lost 30% of it's value in the last 6
years.

> Thanks to the liberal left, we have a problem in this country with people
> being held accountable for their actions.  Left unchecked,as it has, look
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Bo
Jeff Rice - 08 Nov 2007 12:47 GMT
See what I mean....

> Yes, everything is the fault of the liberals. I'm sure glad they are not
> in power to lie us into a war and spend us into bankruptcy, and ruin our
> worldwide reputation. The dollar has lost 30% of it's value in the last 6
> years.

>> "64daytonaht" wrote...
>> Thanks to the liberal left, we have a problem in this country with people
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> thing is the only way we're ever going to even start fixing our problems.
>> Bo

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

itraseecab@aol.com - 08 Nov 2007 13:24 GMT
I  don't see the point of stirring up trouble.  This group has a hard
enough time staying on the topic as it is, let alone providing a
thread designed just to bash people.  I too would like to be warned
about folks that are potentially poor folks to deal with, but I don't
see listing them is a great idea.  If I need specific information
about someone I'll ask.

Joe Roberts
ChampTruckingCompany - 08 Nov 2007 15:36 GMT
On Nov 8, 8:24 am, itrasee...@aol.com wrote:
> I  don't see the point of stirring up trouble.  This group has a hard
> enough time staying on the topic as it is, let alone providing a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Joe Roberts

OK , I am roflmao @ Jeff Rices reply.I totally agree with Bo's
assesment of the lack of responsibility,but I am not sure its just the
liberal left to blame. That is more a sociatal issue overall IMHO.
And I really appreciate the thought put into,and agree with Gregs
reply. Again,I admit this was a bad idea,but it was based in the good
thought of saving others aggravation."No good deed goes un punished"
area I guess.
 And thanks to Henry for the attaboy.With that in mind,here is my
good guy list:
Ted Harbit,wonderfull gentleman,never made me fell stupid for asking
stupid questions! Jim Turner,here is a guy that has become more than
an evil vender,but a real friend.Lee DeLabarre,this guy has bailed my
butt out more than one time,allways has time to educate me or send me
in the right direction ,and too has become a real friend. Jim
Lawarance at FBN Interiors,another gracious gentleman and a guy I owe
a beer or two to. Bo Markham has been a pleasure to deal with,as has
our own JohnnyP. Studebaker International has been good too.They sent
me the wrong item one time,and more than made it up to me.SASCO,
Dennis and Dave Spilski,never have they done me wrong! They too have
become real friends.Jeff Rice,another good dude to trade with,another
guy I consider a friend. James Maxie,more than fair in buisness
dealings.Rex Miltonberger,of antique Studebaker fame,guy never knew me
from Adam,and went out of his way to help a brother Stude nut out.One
of the first guys who showed me the comraderie of Studebaker
nuts.Jerry Forrester is another fantastic individual,business wise and
personally.BobPalma,wish i knew half the Studebaker knowledge he has
forgotten! Richard Quinn,another good guy who went out of his way to
get me what I wanted.Bondo Billy and Ellen,more fantastic people I
have delt with.And Tommy K,the school bus guy.He has made me some
great deals and told me some great stories too. I bet there is a few I
missed due to CRS,and I am sorry for that.
There has been only a few assbags I have delt with,but what goes
around comes around,and I will be there to see it and enjoy it too.
Brooksie - 08 Nov 2007 16:53 GMT
Damn, I missed a whole bunch of good guys! I'll second your choices that
I've dealt with - Jim Turner, Lee DeLaBarre and Jerry Forrester

Brooksie

> On Nov 8, 8:24 am, itrasee...@aol.com wrote:
> OK , I am roflmao @ Jeff Rices reply.I totally agree with Bo's
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> There has been only a few assbags I have delt with,but what goes
> around comes around,and I will be there to see it and enjoy it too.
Grumpy AuContraire - 08 Nov 2007 17:33 GMT
I have a new idea how to park more Studes in yer driveway/garage.

Park 'em meathook style...

<G>

JT

> See what I mean....
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>>thing is the only way we're ever going to even start fixing our problems.
>>>Bo
Pat Drnec - 08 Nov 2007 19:00 GMT
I couldn't agree more. I long for the old days when honorable men took
responsibility for their actions. Men like Oliver North. Men like
Scooter Libby. Men like Tom DeLay and Duke Cunningham. Men like Larry Craig.
Damn liberals. Damn them for destroying individual accountability and honor.

> Thanks to the liberal left, we have a problem in this country with people
> being held accountable for their actions.  Left unchecked,as it has, look
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Bo

Signature

Remove the Studebaker to email.

The only label that fits:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_6966.shtml

1950 Champion
1951 Starlight Coupe Custom
1953 Starlight Coupe
1954 Starlight Coupe R1/4-speed
1958 Silver Hawk
1960 Frua Italia Larks (2 - they're here!)
1962 Lark VI
1962 Lark Convertible
1962 Lark Daytona
1963 Avanti R2 R4324
1963 Lark Daytona
1963 Lark Cruiser
1963 GT Hawk
1963 Daytona Wagonaire
1964 Cruiser (Survivor)
1954 3R11
1956 2E7
1985 Jeep CJ-7
2005 MB SL55
2002 Ducati 996
2007 Ducati 1098
2002 Jeep Overland
http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html

Lee Aanderud - 08 Nov 2007 19:29 GMT
It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.

Lee

>I couldn't agree more. I long for the old days when honorable men took
>responsibility for their actions. Men like Oliver North. Men like Scooter
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Bo

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Jeff Rice - 08 Nov 2007 20:33 GMT
The sad thing is that there is little honor in Washington...
While the political lemmings can't help but attach themselves to a party
(without really knowing why)....
The people in power keep playing their game while ignoring the foundations
our country was founded upon.
Socialism, and Marxism is firmly entrenched in Washington, and we put them
there by voting into office people that have agenda's that are not in the
best interest of the traditional foundations that this country was founded
upon.
Oh, we won't use that word, but it is obvious that it is the correct term
for what is going on as far as the direction they are steering.
Every chance they get, they will knick away at the base that we started with
in order to equalize something and spread things around.
As long as they get their shot to suckle at the nipple of big government,
screw everybody else.
The parties are just vying for power.
You get power two ways.
You earn it.
You steal it.
Earning it is hard when your opposition cares not a whit at what it will
take to get it, keep it, or get it back.
And their minions will blindly shout at the flip of a switch, and chant when
told to.
But both sides should be sorely ashamed at what they have done to tear down
the United States of America.
Tearing it down through the abstract methodology that has been chosen for
the last few decades...maybe a dozen decades.
The only thing that has really changed is the speed at which it is
occurring.
That is the curse of the communications age.
Now you can get that lie out to a thousandfold people when it used to be
harder to tell the story.
And the lie can be twisted, and hid, and buried, and contorted under all
sorts of layers...
But it is still a lie.
The way to power is to flood the country with potential voters and cheap
labor, and promises.
Promises that the latest government program will make your life easier if
you only vote for Mr. X, or Mrs. Y.
What a crock of proverbial crap.
But some fall for the intentional distractions, believing that the
government is the way to solve problems.
Hell, government created the problems just so they could step in and say
they have the solution.
That's about like saying I'll build my Studebaker out of the cheaper steel
and then sell the rustproofing at a discount.
Good stuff! Really works!
But you can only get it at the dealer, and only through the extended
warranty program using automatic payroll deduction.
And then after the POS rust's out on you, and you read the fine print you
find out that the deductible is more than the cost of the car new, and that
it expired a month ago, and the sh.t they sprayed on it is going to give you
cancer.
But that's OK to you, because it isn't a damned Chevy.
Chevy owners are all idiots, and General Motors is honest and true blue
But those bastards over at Ford. They are evil scum.
Their airbags have poison gas in them...
You guys amaze me...
You really do...
If it weren't so amusing, and so freaking predictable, it would be funny....
But it isn't funny.

"Lee Aanderud" wrote...
> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee Aanderud - 08 Nov 2007 21:26 GMT
"If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you're still a
liberal at 30, you have no brain"
                                                                           
                            Winston Churchill

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Karl Haas - 09 Nov 2007 07:40 GMT
>  "If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you're still a
> liberal at 30, you have no brain"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I think that he used an upper-case "L," as Liberal was a poltical
party to which he was once a member, not necessarily what we mean
today by liberal.

I can't imagine Bob Taft, TR, or even "Silent Cal" being overjoyed at
thinking W is todays image of "Republican"
John Poulos - 09 Nov 2007 12:10 GMT
Urban Legend :
     
Quotes Falsely Attributed

These quotes make for good story-telling but popular myth has
falsely attributed them to Churchill.    

"If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart.  If you're
not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."

There is no record of anyone hearing Churchill say this. Paul Addison of
Edinburgh University makes this comment: "Surely Churchill can't have
used the words attributed to him. He'd been a Conservative at 15 and a
Liberal at 35!  "

>>  "If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you're still a
>> liberal at 30, you have no brain"
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I can't imagine Bob Taft, TR, or even "Silent Cal" being overjoyed at
> thinking W is todays image of "Republican"

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
58 Scotsman
53 Starliner
52 Starliner
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Lee Aanderud - 09 Nov 2007 14:05 GMT
"If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you're still a
liberal at 30, you have no brain"
                                                                           
                            Lee Aanderud

Better???  Maybe you better Snopes.com it to make sure.

Lee

> Urban Legend :
>   Quotes Falsely Attributed
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>>
>>>                              Winston Churchill

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

me@notanywhere.net - 09 Nov 2007 00:02 GMT
from Peoplenomics -

Whether you realize it, or not, there's a bill in Washington which
would make it illegal to be critical of the US Government (H.R. 1955)
and it's getting painfully little press. The apologists for corpgov
are quick to point out this is only a 'commission to study' kind of
thing. On the other hand, the blatant and specific attacks on the
internet and the genuine exercise of free speech are obvious swipes at
what little remains of the Constitution.

L.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: Fw: NewsWithViews Alert

Take the time to read these articles. Especially the one about HR1995.
Also follow the link to how your government "representative" voted.

www.NewsWithViews.com
October 29, 2007
New Articles

Why HR1995 was rammed through under cover of fire
"First let's take a look at the definitions of violent radicalization
and homegrown terrorism as defined in Section 899A of the bill. The
definition of violent radicalization uses vague language to define
this term of promoting any belief system that the government considers
to be an extremist agenda. Since the bill doesn't specifically define
what an extremist belief system is, it is entirely up to the
interpretation of the government. Considering how much the government
has done to destroy the Constitution they could even define Ron Paul
supporters as promoting an extremist belief system........
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd318.htm
by Devvy Kidd

WHY HR 1955 WAS RAMMED THROUGH UNDER COVER OF FIRE

By: Devvy
October 29, 2007

© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com

"Paper is poverty, .... it is only the ghost of money, and not money
itself." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1788

Last week while the horrific fires were burning up Southern California
and every major news network, including cable were providing non-stop
coverage, a very dangerous bill to liberty and freedom was passed by
404 members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Called the 'Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007', this
bill is perfectly summed up here:

"First let's take a look at the definitions of violent radicalization
and homegrown terrorism as defined in Section 899A of the bill. The
definition of violent radicalization uses vague language to define
this term of promoting any belief system that the government considers
to be an extremist agenda. Since the bill doesn't specifically define
what an extremist belief system is, it is entirely up to the
interpretation of the government. Considering how much the government
has done to destroy the Constitution they could even define Ron Paul
supporters as promoting an extremist belief system. Literally, the
government according to this definition can define whatever they want
as an extremist belief system. Essentially, they have defined violent
radicalization as thought crime."

Why was this bill passed now? Besides yours truly, thousands of
economists and constitutional activists have been warning for decades
what will happen if treaties like NAFTA were shoved down our throats
destroying our most important, productive job sectors along with the
continued fleecing of the people's purse. Let's look at some current
data to bring things into perspective and it's not pretty:

Foreclosures, default notices soar locally and across the state.
October 26, 2007: "Home loan defaults and foreclosures spiked again
sharply in July, August and September throughout California and the
capital region, setting records and adding more stress to an
already-slumping housing market." Billions in housing wealth at risk
as foreclosures soar. October 26, 2007: "More than $23.6 billion in
California housing wealth will evaporate if real estate prices
continue to decline and foreclosures on subprime home loans soar,
according to a new congressional report that indicates the fallout
from the national mortgage crisis is worsening." Cash-strapped
Americans raiding their 401(k)s. October 14, 2007: "Despite potential
tax and investment problems, more investors have been borrowing from
their 401(k) plans or taking hardship withdrawals in recent months,
some retirement plan providers say. Many in the field expect more
borrowing in 2008, as consumers struggle with tighter credit and
potentially higher mortgage payments."

2 Million Americans Face Losing Their Home. October 26, 2007: "An
influential congressional committee warned yesterday that 2 million US
families face losing their homes in a "tidal wave" of repossessions
with an estimated cost of $71bn." US loan default problems widen.
October 21 2007: " Poor quarterly results from banks across the US
over the past two weeks suggest credit problems once confined to
high-risk mortgage borrowers are spreading across the consumer
landscape, posing new risks to the economy and weighing heavily on the
markets. US banks have raised reserves for loan losses by at least
$6bn over the second quarter and by even larger amounts from last
year, indicating financial executives believe consumers will be
increasingly unable to make payments on a variety of loans. " Goodbye
dollar, hello inflation. October 24, 2007: "In summary, expect
continued deterioration in the dollar's purchasing power and increases
in inflation over the longer term. Inflation will not be confined to
the US; it has appeared and will continue to appear in countries
across the globe. Every government will try their damnedest to paper
over their monetary inflation with ridiculous explanations and
reconfigured price indexes which purport to show "low inflation".
Still, worldwide inflation is here and it is only a question of which
fiat currency will depreciate at the fastest rate against relatively
hard currencies and gold."

When people have no money to spend except for food and shelter, it
kills the local economy. Retailers are already anticipating a dismal
Christmas season. Dr. Edwin Vieira has warned for decades this banking
crisis was coming. He pointed out in a column, March 17, 2005, that a
monetary and banking crisis was on its way. In his March 21, 2005,
column, Edwin said: "Pointing out these stories to a New Hampshire
State Legislator, I explained the logical connection among them:
first, that this country is on the verge of an inevitable financial
melt-down; second, that politicians are intent on making things even
worse; and third, that when the Ponzi pyramid collapses, the same
politicians whose irresponsibility caused the situation will impose
draconian restrictions on common Americans by means of police forces
amply provided with weapons and heavy equipment suitable for
house-to-house fighting in Stalingrad."

Many times I have reminded Americans that back in 1984, Lt. Col.
Oliver North, directly helped draft a plan in 1984 at the direction of
Ronald Reagan to impose martial law in the United States in the event
of an emergency. This secret plan would suspend the U.S. Constitution
and turn over control of the government to the little known agency at
that time: FEMA. This plan would appoint military commanders to run
state and local governments - remember Katrina? Implementation of this
plan would have been triggered by violent and wide spread internal
dissent, disagreement with government policy or national opposition to
any U.S. military invasion abroad. Essentially, it amounted to a
complete and total suspension of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of
Rights.

Many times I have reminded Americans about a 1997 essay in the
Sacramento Bee titled: Our Civilian-Military Face off, which also
carried a sub headline: Bill of Rights No Obstacle for the [Marine]
Corps. This piece exposed the mindset way back then that at some point
due to: "...the rising potential for civil disobedience within the
inner cities it is 'inevitable' the U.S. military will be employed
more often within American borders." In my March 10, 2005 column, I
said that at some point, it was a given that posse comitatus is likely
to be thrown out the window. WACO was the test case in violation of
posse comitatus which resulted in our military burning and gassing to
death 74 Americans, 17 of them children. For the most part, America
was silent and sickeningly, large numbers felt the outcome was
"necessary." Well, it came to pass and NWVs columnist, Greg Evensen,
former Kansas State Trooper, summed it up quit succinctly:

"In addition to this "group think" concerning the police "mission" of
enforcing the law-regardless of whether or not the law is righteous or
constitutional---is the recent historic change in federal law. I am
referring to Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense
Authorization Act of 2007" (HR5122) (2), was signed by President Bush
on October 17, 2006...It allows the President to declare a "public
emergency" and station troops anywhere in America. Further, Section
1076 of this Act, entitled "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public
Emergencies and Section 333 Major Public Emergencies--interference
with State and Federal Law, says that the President may use these
forces when HE determines that domestic violence has occurred to such
an extent that a State is incapable of (read that "refuse or fail" in)
maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination thereof or
conspiracy to commit these acts against the United States. This
"repeal" of the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) is a deadly blow on this
historic prevention of US army units intervening in local disputes.
The 1878 Act, protected local jurisdictions and even states from the
willful intervention of corrupted or dictatorial executive branch
orders being forced upon the locals by Army units in a law enforcement
capacity."

Back in 1999, the International Association of Undercover Officers
held a conference and put out a manual titled 'Homegrown Extremists.'
This manual will shock you, i.e,. the Fully Informed Jury Association
which teaches people about their serious responsibilities as a juror
is blasted as an extremist organization. This is the kind of
propaganda that was being jammed down the throats of law enforcement
almost a decade ago. Most certainly there are dangerous groups in this
country, but through toxic organizations like the Southern "Poverty"
Law Center, this type of propaganda is now standard fare for law
enforcement. Constitutionalists are deliberately lumped in with the
KKK and wacky cults. Pg 52 begins "Know your enemy" and they are
white, educated Christians. The full manual is scanned here

(see website for links. L.).

The timing of the passage of H.R. 1955 was no accident; see roll call
of votes here. The fact that 404 members of the U.S. House of
Representatives voted for it tells me this collective body of
dangerous individuals that have taken this country, with the blessing
of every past president since Roosevelt, to the brink of financial
ruin are now very afraid of what's going to happen when the peasants
(that's us) find themselves left with nothing. Additionally, the push
for a new, unbiased investigation into 911 is turning into an
unmanageable situation for the shadow government.

Tens of millions of Americans do NOT want Bush to unconstitutionally
invade and bomb Iran, a non threatening country and should the
peasants, commonly referred to as the "working man", refuse to support
this insanity, a new draconian law will be in place to crush we the
people. Many now realize it's too late to stop exactly what Lou Dobbs
so courageously railed about on his show, October 26, 2007:

"And the leadership, of course, emanating from Washington is brilliant
dealing with the issue of $92-a-barrel crude oil, a Middle East policy
that is a joke, an energy policy for this country that is nonexistent.
This administration and the previous absolutely derelict...And I love,
I love these jackasses in this administration, particularly in their
-- the treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, the commerce secretary, this
president, all of them talk coming together to create a super-fund for
the money center banks, investment banks in this country to put
together maybe about $100 billion fund, so that they won't have to
suffer losses as a result of their bad credit market investments and
risk taken in their portfolios, particularly in subprime mortgage. But
we have got millions of people facing foreclosures, the resets that
you're talking about on those mortgages, ARMs that were designed for
the convenience of the industry. And this administration and this
Congress is not moving to deal with a way to relieve that debt and
that incredible pressure that it's going to put on middle- class
families."

Empty bellies make for angry mobs. How much do you have in your
savings account to keep emptying the ocean with a teaspoon? Are you
one of the above borrowing from your 401(k)? What will be left at
"retirement" time to see to your needs in your golden years? Crude
closed at $92/per barrel last Friday; when Bush took office it was
$18/barrel. This winter, our fellow Americans in states like
Pennsylvania, Ohio and the New England States will have to face
staying warm vs eating and/or dropping their health care premiums
because there's no money left in the till to pay another increase in
heating fuel oil. While Marxists like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi
eat off gold plated china, Bush will continue to blow $10 BILLION
dollars a month on his insane wars and since there's no money in the
treasury, that $10 BILLION will have to be borrowed and squeezed from
we the people who have nothing left to give. And, these buzzards in
Congress just keep writing hot checks:

Here piggie, piggie! Billions in fed trough. "Millions earmarked for
La Raza radicals: $3.74 million for research into the Formosan
Subterranean Termite, requested by Reps. Rodney Alexander and Richard
Baker of Louisiana; $1.7 million for the Centers for Disease Control
to fund a Hollywood liaison to advise doctor dramas." While you're
trying to figure out how to provide health care insurance for your
family, get them needed dental work, buy shoes and little dresses,
this is what these damnable crooks in Congress are blowing money on
when the treasury is empty. [Order and read Judge Andrew Napolitano's
newest book "A Nation Of Sheep"]

The worst is now staring all of us in the face and I respectfully
recommend every American do several things as soon as you can:

(1) Diversify a good portion of your assets into gold. I'm not a gold
dealer, but my friends at El Dorado Gold know this issue inside and
out and they will tell you that right now that stock market is on the
same path as 1929. October 18, 2007: Dow drops over 366 on anniversary
of Black Friday. This was a warning people had better take seriously.
Call Eric in the Florida office at 623.643.8785 or, if you prefer
closer to the West Coast, call Harvey at 602.228.8203. Congress is
staring at double-digit TRILLIONS needed next year when that first
wave of baby boomers retire. There's no money in the treasury and all
the BS pouring out of Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary's mouth, or pie
in the sky promises from Rudy Julie Annie, Huckabee or Romney isn't
going to stop what is already underway.

(2) Get your affairs in order which means paperwork like wills,
trusts, etc. DON'T put off this important task for a baseball game,
round of golf or tv program.

(3) Disaster can happen at any time, so everyone should make sure they
have at least a few weeks of food supplies, along with vitamins and
medical necessities stored. If there's any disruption with our road
warriors (truckers) being able to get to your area, your family will
starve and there won't be any running down to China (Wal) Mart for a
prescription refill that could mean life or death.

(4) Of paramount importance: Exercise your Second Amendment right to
own and bear arms for the protection of you and yours. The federal
government is knowingly protecting Muslim terrorist cells in this
country. Patrick Briley and others have been attempting to get members
of the Oklahoma State Legislature to demand answers from the feds as
to why they aren't rounding up these terrorists in that state and I'm
telling you flat out: we're all at risk. I've known Patrick for almost
ten years and his research is 100% solid; see here.

Please get on the phone to your House member this week and tell them:

Bush simply cannot invade or bomb Iran like some banana republic
dictator. A formal declaration of war is REQUIRED under the U.S.
Constitution by Congress and we the people do NOT want any military
aggression against a non threatening country like Iran. Stop this
lunacy or find another job next November.

Demand they vote yes NOW on the bills below because they are critical
in beginning the rebuilding process:

H.R. 2755: Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act. To abolish the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve
banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes.  

H. Con. Res. 40: The United States should not engage in the
construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico
and Canada.

H.R. 3835: The American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007 which will restore
habeas corpus by repealing the Military Commissions Act of 2006.  

H. Con. Res. 22: The President should provide notice of withdrawal of
the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA).

H.R.4855: Get rid of the unnecessary withholding taxing scheme. This
bill was introduced by Congressman Ron Paul, July 27, 2000 and we the
people demand a new bill get introduced and passed as well as abolish
the IRS.

Important links:

1 - Reconstituting the militia under the states
2 - No income tax necessary to fund federal government
3 - The right argument on taxes
4 - Is the U.S. Government Sneaking Gold Out of Fort Knox?
5 - US Food Riots Much Closer Than You Think
6 - Iran: The Road to Armageddon?
7 - We must bomb Iran, says Republican guru

© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

--Shiva--

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ChampTruckingCompany - 09 Nov 2007 13:02 GMT
> The sad thing is that there is little honor in Washington...
> While the political lemmings can't help but attach themselves to a party
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Wow Jeff!!!!!!!!!!!!!  You see the same  concept in marketing. Create
a demand,then bring the widget to market. Car magazines too. Lets make
a trend this month,IE Pro Touring,or what ever.They hype an idea a
issue or two,then some aftermarket company does a build with the new
suspention whack a dooie while they photograph it and crow about how
"its the latest trend!"( No collusion there!) And the happy sheeple
brainwashed by the media machine,happily toil towards the appointed
goal. Wonderfull aint it? Amazing how so many people can't THINK FOR
THEMSELVES.
Pat Drnec - 15 Nov 2007 20:06 GMT
Y'all are a real treat - all I did was offer a counterpoint. You guys
know what that is, right? When someone makes a silly generalization
about a group (Liberals, in this case) and lays the problems of the
world at their feet because of some perceived trait they ALL share, a
COUNTERPOINT is to offer up examples of some of their icons who
personify those traits. Kind of shows it up for the bullshit propaganda
it is.

Y'all have a nice day. Glad I could stimulate the hypothalamus for you.

> The sad thing is that there is little honor in Washington...
> While the political lemmings can't help but attach themselves to a party
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
>> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.

Signature

Remove the Studebaker to email.

The only label that fits:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_6966.shtml

1950 Champion
1951 Starlight Coupe Custom
1953 Starlight Coupe
1954 Starlight Coupe R1/4-speed
1958 Silver Hawk
1960 Frua Italia Larks (2 - they're here!)
1962 Lark VI
1962 Lark Convertible
1962 Lark Daytona
1963 Avanti R2 R4324
1963 Lark Daytona
1963 Lark Cruiser
1963 GT Hawk
1963 Daytona Wagonaire
1964 Cruiser (Survivor)
1954 3R11
1956 2E7
1985 Jeep CJ-7
2005 MB SL55
2002 Ducati 996
2007 Ducati 1098
2002 Jeep Overland
http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html

Jeff Rice - 15 Nov 2007 22:04 GMT
And your counterpoint was well taken for exactly what it was.
My reply was pointed at both parties.
If, in your reading, you can only see one side of my prose, then the filter
is on your end.
To dismiss it as propaganda is telling.
My comments were directed as much at the 'right' as it was at the 'left'.
And the trip point for the reply was a 'right' generated comment, so I guess
it matters not.
Once the person has the label applied to them, then most conversation
reverts to noise.
Kind of sad, really.
Good political discourse can be invigorating.
If it is done in the right place.
Jeff

"Pat Drnec" wrote...
> Y'all are a real treat - all I did was offer a counterpoint. You guys know
> what that is, right? When someone makes a silly generalization about a
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>>> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
>>> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Pat Drnec - 18 Nov 2007 03:14 GMT
What part of "Y'all" means you alone?

> And your counterpoint was well taken for exactly what it was.
> My reply was pointed at both parties.
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
>>>> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
>>>> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.

Signature

Remove the Studebaker to email.

The only label that fits:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_6966.shtml

1950 Champion
1951 Starlight Coupe Custom
1953 Starlight Coupe
1954 Starlight Coupe R1/4-speed
1958 Silver Hawk
1960 Frua Italia Larks (2 - they're here!)
1962 Lark VI
1962 Lark Convertible
1962 Lark Daytona
1963 Avanti R2 R4324
1963 Lark Daytona
1963 Lark Cruiser
1963 GT Hawk
1963 Daytona Wagonaire
1964 Cruiser (Survivor)
1954 3R11
1956 2E7
1985 Jeep CJ-7
2005 MB SL55
2002 Ducati 996
2007 Ducati 1098
2002 Jeep Overland
http://homepage.mac.com/pdrnec/PhotoAlbum81.html

Jeff Rice - 18 Nov 2007 13:53 GMT
Well then, you'd best clip the quote attached that you are replying to.
This simpleton didn't read the opening caveat that way <g>..
As far as my hypothalamus goes?
I suppose it could use stimulation.
Strange thing is, I know what one is, and where it is located.
(I removed one with a pair of needle nosed pliers during an autopsy once..)
Jeff

"Pat Drnec" wrote...
> What part of "Y'all" means you alone?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Karl Haas - 19 Nov 2007 17:12 GMT
> Well then, you'd best clip the quote attached that you are replying to.
> This simpleton didn't read the opening caveat that way <g>..
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Shoot all extremists!

Karl
Jeff - 20 Nov 2007 22:58 GMT
Start with those that can't spell 'always' <lol>
Jeff

> Shoot all extremists!
> Karl
oldcarfart - 25 Nov 2007 20:43 GMT
> What part of "Y'all" means you alone?
>
[quoted text clipped - 149 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

face it Pat, you get a quivering leg and a stimulation from "stirring
the pot" <grin>
Bob - 25 Nov 2007 21:52 GMT
Welcome back,Calvin

Bob40

>> What part of "Y'all" means you alone?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 181 lines]
> face it Pat, you get a quivering leg and a stimulation from "stirring
> the pot" <grin>
Brooksie - 08 Nov 2007 21:27 GMT
And Susan Saranwrap wants someone in the White House who will "do what they
say they will do".  Yeah, Demoncraps will always be the honourable ones in
office. Pass the KoolAid...

Brooksie

> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>>
>>> Bo
cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net - 08 Nov 2007 21:39 GMT
> It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
> Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.
>
> Lee

Personally, I think virtually ALL politicians are crooks.
Maybe not when they start out, but eventually they succumb.

Chip

Signature

-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

gregscoggin@yahoo.com - 08 Nov 2007 22:48 GMT
On Nov 8, 1:39 pm, cjdaytonjrnos...@cox.net wrote:
> > It's comforting to know that there aren't any crooked Democrats in
> > Washington... there can't be, Pat didn't list any.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Jeff, that is one hell of a synopsis....I think you have just written
the intro to your thesis for your Masters in Political
Science.....whew...smokin'!
Jeff Rice - 08 Nov 2007 22:57 GMT
Sort of like pissin' into a fan, huh? <lol>

<gregscoggin wrote...
> Jeff, that is one hell of a synopsis....I think you have just written  the
> intro to your thesis for your Masters in Political
> Science.....whew...smokin'!

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Grumpy AuContraire - 09 Nov 2007 02:42 GMT
Which is OK so long as you are standing in back of it...

<g>

JT

> Sort of like pissin' into a fan, huh? <lol>
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>intro to your thesis for your Masters in Political
>>Science.....whew...smokin'!
Jeff Rice - 08 Nov 2007 12:46 GMT
This is NOT a swap page.
This is an unmoderated looney bin.
Post a thread about anything, and watch it morph magically into one of five
subjects (politics', religion, economics, immigration, and taxes) that
tickle the fancy of a certain few.
(I can say this as I have, at times, been guilty of it too, and a moderated
forum makes little difference).

Personally?
I think it would be better if one were to get screwed on a deal to just say
so
here.....
But tell the readers to contact you via private e-mail if they want the
details.
Slamming a particular person on an unmoderated (or moderated) newsgroup
(read that 'in public') might open you up to some kind of legal action.

<JTlark63@yahoo.com> wrote...
> the deal was made through this  swap page...and you are  correct ,I am
> as fair game as the next guy, no argument here ..

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mark Dunning - 08 Nov 2007 15:37 GMT
'Nother data point - it is forever when you hit send.

Oonce it hits usenet - it can be refernced for a LOOOOOOOOONG time
Think twice , type once.

Mark

> This is NOT a swap page.
> This is an unmoderated looney bin.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> the deal was made through this  swap page...and you are  correct ,I am
>> as fair game as the next guy, no argument here ..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.