Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New ebay tax

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Poulos - 17 Dec 2007 02:23 GMT
The 2008 proposed budget contains a provision that would require
ebay to report to the IRS any seller that does $5000 in gross sales in
one year. Ebay is fighting it since it does not apply to any other
private sales, auctions, Craig's list and the like. If it passes, be
prepared to pay taxes if you sold your Studebaker for more then you paid
or document every dime you spent on it. The same with parts, that $10
part you bought in 1980 is going to get taxed big time if it goes for
say $200 if you exceed the 5K a year.
    Ebay has already stated they will have to raise fees to cover the
IRS paperwork, but contends they are no more involved in the sale then
Crag's list, or a newspaper ad, they're just providing a venue for the
sale between two parties.
Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
58 Scotsman
53 Starliner
52 Starliner
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Lee Aanderud - 17 Dec 2007 02:38 GMT
There was a report out years ago about E-Bay and the IRS.  Seems some people
have decided to forego their brick and mortar store for the virtual one.
The IRS became suddenly interested and was supposedly tracking sales...
could make an audit very interesting.

Lee

>    The 2008 proposed budget contains a provision that would require ebay
> to report to the IRS any seller that does $5000 in gross sales in one
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> list, or a newspaper ad, they're just providing a venue for the sale
> between two parties.
satdoc2 - 17 Dec 2007 04:01 GMT
Would they be so mean as to send an old 67 year old man to jail or just
attach his meager social security.
Allen
>There was a report out years ago about E-Bay and the IRS.  Seems some people
>have decided to forego their brick and mortar store for the virtual one.
>The IRS became suddenly interested and was supposedly tracking sales...
>could make an audit very interesting

Signature

Allen French

Grumpy AuContraire - 17 Dec 2007 04:55 GMT
The way that this 67 year old sees it, the guv'ment would spend a
million to collect $10 from you.  Jail...  Hey, 3 squares, all the TV
you can watch and the benefits of rehab might be just fine!

<g>

JT

> Would they be so mean as to send an old 67 year old man to jail or just
> attach his meager social security.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>The IRS became suddenly interested and was supposedly tracking sales...
>>could make an audit very interesting
Lee Aanderud - 17 Dec 2007 14:49 GMT
But to look at it from the other side, if you're selling $100,000 worth of
parts out of your brick & mortar store and having to declare any profits as
income.  If I start up a virtual store online (through E-Bay) and sell
$100,000 worth of parts why should I be exempt from having to declare the
profits as income?  This isn't to hit the guy emptying out his attic or
basement, it's to hit the guy who is running a business online.

Lee

> Would they be so mean as to send an old 67 year old man to jail or just
> attach his meager social security.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>The IRS became suddenly interested and was supposedly tracking sales...
>>could make an audit very interesting
Barry - 17 Dec 2007 17:05 GMT
ebay revenue has always been subject to income taxes, of course, and ebay
has always been ready & willing to provide info to the IRS if asked. All the
feds have to do if fishing for unreported income is to ask ebay if an
individual has been using their service, and total revenues from ebay sales
will be considered as income, unless receipts are provided by the seller for
the cost of goods sold. With parts, the goods could be that part you bought
in the 80's for $10 and recently sold for a few hundred, or that part you
bought at a swap meet w/no receipt and sold for a 20% mark-up. You had
better be able to provide some kind of receipt and hope the auditor will
accept it if. Few people can afford to pay income tax on total sales.
Once a subject is marked, the goons will spend thousands to find a few
hundred in unreported income, but really prefer for the subject to provide
them with the noose with which to hang him. They are really lazy. When
greasing someone up for an audit, they demand that all records, bank
atatements, deposit slips, etc. be made avaialble for their use. They hate
to dig unless they really have to. It would be easier for them if ebay would
just turn in a 1099 on everybody.
What hangs most people is under-reporting on ther tax returns, which are a
sworn affidavit, and it is a crime to falsely swear an affidavit, though it
is not a crime not to pay the tax. Since tax payers know that their income
must be reported, they try to carefully keep all receipts for goods sold,
business expenses, rents, etc., which the auditors can  throw out or
disregard at their whim, increasing the tax liability to an unreasonable
amount. (been there, done that)
It is really past time for a change in the tax structure and to tell
Washington that is not their money, it is our money.
I will stop before I get into the politics of the subject.
BH
> But to look at it from the other side, if you're selling $100,000 worth of
> parts out of your brick & mortar store and having to declare any profits as
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > Message posted via CarKB.com
> > http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/studebaker/200712/1
John Poulos - 17 Dec 2007 17:12 GMT
OK, found the proposed law and you need not worry about submitting
your SS # to ebay quite yet:

"Internet auction sites will only be required to report customer
revenue information if the customer does more than 100 separate
transactions in a fiscal year and generates more than $5,000 in gross
proceeds. In a report from the Information Reporting Program Advisory
Committee (part of the IRS), the new proposal is supported by a 2005
study showing that over 700,000 Americans have a primary or secondary
source of income through eBay."

> ebay revenue has always been subject to income taxes, of course, and ebay
> has always been ready & willing to provide info to the IRS if asked. All the
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>> Message posted via CarKB.com
>>> http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/studebaker/200712/1

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
58 Scotsman
53 Starliner
52 Starliner
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Lee - 17 Dec 2007 19:14 GMT
Guess we just need to keep it to under 2 sales a week as long as it
truly is an 100 sales AND $5k instead of 100 sales OR $5k

>  OK, found the proposed law and you need not worry about submitting
>your SS # to ebay quite yet:
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>>>> Message posted via CarKB.com
>>>> http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/studebaker/200712/1

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Grumpy AuContraire - 18 Dec 2007 04:58 GMT
That "and" or "or" can be the difference between day 'n night.

Fortunately, I'm not subject to a lot of income tax these days...

JT

> Guess we just need to keep it to under 2 sales a week as long as it
> truly is an 100 sales AND $5k instead of 100 sales OR $5k
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
Lee Aanderud - 18 Dec 2007 14:15 GMT
The way I read that statement says that you will be reported if you have
both... 100 sales and $5000 in proceeds (so you can't average more than $50
sale).  What this says to me is that you could have 10 transactions selling
high end collectibles or automobiles and have $100,000 in proceeds or 40,000
sales selling 10 cent coupons with $4000 in proceeds and they wouldn't
report you to the IRS.  This doesn't make any sense, and I'm sure others
writing this law will question it.  But as I've said all along, it's my
opinion that they are after the people running a business online and not the
guy selling grandma's estate.  Expect to see more low BIN prices and huge
shipping charges... $1.00 vehicles with $20,000 shipping charges (no pick up
available).

If I had to bet, I'd put money on them change the 100 sales AND $5000
proceeds to 100 sales OR $5000 proceeds.  Or not even mentioning the number
of sales... as taxable income, the IRS doesn't care if you work 1 job or 10
jobs, all they are interested in is your gross income.

Lee

> That "and" or "or" can be the difference between day 'n night.
>
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>> Lee DeLaBarre
>> Daytona62
keith_kichefski@wed.dresser.com - 18 Dec 2007 14:28 GMT
It's a good thing that this forum hasn't died completely, when
moderation sets in on others.  I thought it was just getting good and
held my interest.

Copied:

Please move this discussion to another forum. In fact, one was just
started for Stude Folks to discuss a broader variety of topics than is
appropriate here. Thank you.

BS...Webmaster
John Poulos - 18 Dec 2007 14:49 GMT
Actually I was glad jumped in. The thread started to bash the party that
did not suggest the tax, but the party that is against it and was headed
into a political rant.

kichefski@wed.dresser.com wrote:
> It's a good thing that this forum hasn't died completely, when
> moderation sets in on others.  I thought it was just getting good and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> BS...Webmaster

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
63 R2 4 speed GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
62 Lark 2 door
60 Hawk
58 Scotsman
53 Starliner
52 Starliner
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Barry - 19 Dec 2007 16:09 GMT
You mean that you still believe that it is a 2-party system??? lol!
I just see one party with 2 major wings to give the people sometthing to
argue about and give us the illusion of a choice.
Barry'd in Studes(and taxes)

> Actually I was glad jumped in. The thread started to bash the party that
> did not suggest the tax, but the party that is against it and was headed
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> 39 Coupe Express
> 39 Coupe Express (body)
Grumpy AuContraire - 20 Dec 2007 17:43 GMT
I tol' you a zillion time to move outta hoostin and set up shop about 75
miles to the west.

Less 'squiters
Less taxes
Less peepils
Less guv'ment

Etc, etc, etc...

<sigh>

JT

> You mean that you still believe that it is a 2-party system??? lol!
> I just see one party with 2 major wings to give the people sometthing to
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>39 Coupe Express
>>39 Coupe Express (body)
Barry - 21 Dec 2007 04:43 GMT
Are you volunteerin' to help me move? <g>

> I tol' you a zillion time to move outta hoostin and set up shop about 75
> miles to the west.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >>39 Coupe Express
> >>39 Coupe Express (body)
Grumpy AuContraire - 21 Dec 2007 17:03 GMT
What % are you offering???

<G>

JT

(Who questions whether enough time infinitum remains)

> Are you volunteerin' to help me move? <g>
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>>>>39 Coupe Express
>>>>39 Coupe Express (body)
Lee - 17 Dec 2007 19:10 GMT
True....  however, if you sold your Toyota pickup on e-Bay next year
and it brought, say $15k, do you want uncle sam making your justify
that 'income'?

>But to look at it from the other side, if you're selling $100,000 worth of
>parts out of your brick & mortar store and having to declare any profits as
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>>The IRS became suddenly interested and was supposedly tracking sales...
>>>could make an audit very interesting

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Lee Aanderud - 17 Dec 2007 23:24 GMT
Well since I have a receipt saying I paid $22,000 for it in 2005 and about
another $1000 in maintenance receipts I won't have to worry.

I went through a state audit a few months ago, if you have everything that
they question there's no problem... other than pulling out a folder with my
paperwork and submitting copies the whole process was painless.  Now if I
had fudged numbers, had no receipts, etc... I'd probably have ulcers by now.

Lee

> True....  however, if you sold your Toyota pickup on e-Bay next year
> and it brought, say $15k, do you want uncle sam making your justify
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
Paul Johnson - 17 Dec 2007 19:30 GMT
> Would they be so mean as to send an old 67 year old man to jail or just
> attach his meager social security.
Yes.
Paul Johnson
RBK. - 25 Dec 2007 01:49 GMT
> There was a report out years ago about E-Bay and the IRS.  Seems some people
> have decided to forego their brick and mortar store for the virtual one.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> > 39 Coupe Express
> > 39 Coupe Express (body)

All of you should look to Ron Paul.
He is the only presidential candidate who makes sense.
He wants to shut down the I.R.S.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
Robert Kapteyn
Brooksie - 25 Dec 2007 03:55 GMT
Very interesting to listen to... recently on Glenn Beck, straightforward
kinda guy, hasn't a snowball's chance in purgatory unfortunately... whyzzit
however that the for-now leading contender is condemned for having an affair
while married when Billy Boy was lauded by Hollywood for wetting his cigars
with something other than his own lips?

Brooksie

On Dec 16, 8:38 pm, "Lee Aanderud" <aande...@alltel.net> wrote:
> There was a report out years ago about E-Bay and the IRS. Seems some
> people
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > 39 Coupe Express
> > 39 Coupe Express (body)

All of you should look to Ron Paul.
He is the only presidential candidate who makes sense.
He wants to shut down the I.R.S.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
Robert Kapteyn
Grumpy AuContraire - 26 Dec 2007 01:35 GMT
>>There was a report out years ago about E-Bay and the IRS.  Seems some people
>>have decided to forego their brick and mortar store for the virtual one.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
> Robert Kapteyn

Sorry, but Paul is a fringe libertarian loony. Big talk but no hard
solutions.

Unfortuately, the whole political line up in '08 looks pretty dismal.

JT
Jeff Rice - 17 Dec 2007 02:49 GMT
Ebay may say they are fighting it, but they have already enabled the
recording process by offering Ebay reports on your Ebay activities.
Jeff

"John Poulos" wrote...
>    The 2008 proposed budget contains a provision that would require ebay
> to report to the IRS any seller that does $5000 in gross sales in one
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> list, or a newspaper ad, they're just providing a venue for the sale
> between two parties.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee - 17 Dec 2007 04:27 GMT
I can see a rash of fake names, false identities, etc coming from this

>    The 2008 proposed budget contains a provision that would require
>ebay to report to the IRS any seller that does $5000 in gross sales in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Crag's list, or a newspaper ad, they're just providing a venue for the
>sale between two parties.

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
zoombot - 17 Dec 2007 04:41 GMT
Anytime that much money is changing hands, Uncle Sam wants a cut.
That's why the IRS hates the barter system.
Jeff DeWitt - 17 Dec 2007 05:55 GMT
> Anytime that much money is changing hands, Uncle Sam wants a cut.
> That's why the IRS hates the barter system.

Anytime ANY money changes hands the government thinks it should get a
cut, they make the old mobsters charging "protection" money seem generous.

Jeff DeWitt
zoombot - 17 Dec 2007 14:40 GMT
> Anytime ANY money changes hands the government thinks it should get a
> cut, they make the old mobsters charging "protection" money seem generous.
>
> Jeff DeWitt

Well, as least most of the politicos aren't carrying guns.
They are scary, but in a different way.
markshere2 - 17 Dec 2007 16:12 GMT
> Anytime ANY money changes hands the government thinks it should get a
> cut, they make the old mobsters charging "protection" money seem generous.
>
> Jeff DeWitt

..Well, as least most of the politicos aren't ...carrying guns.
..They are scary, but in a different way.

Oh yeah they have guns - they hire "police" to enforce their theft.  

And many of then are trying to confiscate all the guns they can from
everybody that has them.  

'For the children"' doncha know?  To allow victims to "feel safer".  

How about that  Supreme court Kelo decision?

Government is NOT your friend unless you want more social programs.

Mark (getting bitter) Dunning

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.studebaker/
More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html
Jeff DeWitt - 17 Dec 2007 23:43 GMT
>>Anytime ANY money changes hands the government thinks it should get a
>>cut, they make the old mobsters charging "protection" money seem
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.studebaker/
> More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html

Exactly
Grumpy AuContraire - 17 Dec 2007 04:52 GMT
Sooner or later, the guv'ment will git their grubby hands on your money.

Hopefully, I'll be able to get, er sell my truck prior to then.

Did I ever mention that I hate the guv'ment?

<G>

JT

>    The 2008 proposed budget contains a provision that would require ebay
> to report to the IRS any seller that does $5000 in gross sales in one
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Crag's list, or a newspaper ad, they're just providing a venue for the
> sale between two parties.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.