Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Door wide open? (semi OT)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Studebaker George - 22 Feb 2008 23:15 GMT
Seems to me that Ebay's recent crap has left the door open for another
company to step in and at least take a chunk of their market; i.e. the
automotive and especially the classic and antique parts and car
market.  There is enough of it to do a completely separate thing and
advertising needed would be minimal 'cause the hobbyists would provide
enough word of mouth advertising.  Maybe Hemmings or the Kruse
operation??  Most of us car people don't look much at the rest of
ebay, or at least not as often or with as much 'vigor'...
 While I'm on the ebay subject, has anyone decided to add some
handling fee for paypay use?  Many places add a fee for credit card
use, so why not for using the ripoff paypal dept. of ebay?  And
JP...where are you about all the new ebay policy?  I haven't seen too
much of you "weighing in" on all this, either here or on the M&H
forum...
Studebaker George
(One of the "little" sellers that is getting stomped on...or out?)
mbstude - 23 Feb 2008 00:06 GMT
I'm guessing you seen this, right George? Straight from the M&H
Gang... <g>

http://studebakerdriversclub.com/sdc_forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=16158

MB
Studebaker George - 23 Feb 2008 00:14 GMT
I missed that one, Matthew, thanks...I have been REAL busy lately and
just can't read everything...
I still want to know what peope think about adding a FEE for using
paypal....I didn't use it until recently when a buddy convinced me
that I would get higher and more bids if I used it.  What a mistake, I
may even dump it entirely.  I went years without it anyway...
Studebaker George
Jeff Rice - 23 Feb 2008 00:32 GMT
I do believe that Ebay has a definite rule against adding a PayPal fee or
surcharge.
I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
Jeff

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Jerry Forrester - 23 Feb 2008 01:00 GMT
Same thing with credit card companies. They will cancel your merchant
account if they catch you adding a cc surcharge.
JF

>I do believe that Ebay has a definite rule against adding a PayPal fee or
>surcharge.
> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
> Jeff
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 01:04 GMT
Really?  I see that fairly often.

Lee

> Same thing with credit card companies. They will cancel your merchant
> account if they catch you adding a cc surcharge.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
>> Jeff
Studebaker George - 23 Feb 2008 01:11 GMT
I see that REAL often.  Maybe the "catching" merchants doing that is
the hard part...I have a friend who has a prosperous little shop and
he charges a fee every time that plastic comes out.  Most people PAY
it....
Studebaker George
Jerry Forrester - 23 Feb 2008 01:16 GMT
I didn't say it isn't done. I said "If they catch you".
When a body opens a merchant account he signs a contract stating that he
wont charge a surcharge (probably in the fine print, but it's there).
I guess I'm old school, if I enter into a contract, I will abide to that
contract.
Look on any of my business cards and you will see "All you gotta do is "Say
what you're gonna do and Do what you said""
JF

> Really?  I see that fairly often.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
>>> Jeff
Jerry Forrester - 23 Feb 2008 01:03 GMT
Same thing with credit card companies. They will cancel your merchant
account if they catch you adding a surchage for cc sales.
JF

>I do believe that Ebay has a definite rule against adding a PayPal fee or
>surcharge.
> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
> Jeff
Grumpy AuContraire - 23 Feb 2008 04:41 GMT
In the past some merchants, (not eBay), added a 3% charge if one used a
credit card.  But the practice is almost unheard of today.  In fact, I
think that a few states passed laws preventing the practice.

I just think that the seller just should accept the charge as part of
the cost of doing business.  No point on alienating potential customers...

JT

> I do believe that Ebay has a definite rule against adding a PayPal fee or
> surcharge.
> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
> Jeff
Gordon Richmond - 23 Feb 2008 14:37 GMT
>In the past some merchants, (not eBay), added a 3% charge if one used a
>credit card.  But the practice is almost unheard of today.  In fact, I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> I think (iirc) I had an auction of mine killed off for doing that...
>> Jeff

You have to remember, that for many businesses, handling cash is a problem. How many
C-stores would get held up by crackheads if it became widely known that they only took
credit cards?

It's not just the risk of holdups, either. A large cash business creates the risk of
embezzlement by employees, too.

I'm certainly no cheerleader for the "cashless society", but I can see reasons why it is
coming about.

Gord Richmond
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 00:46 GMT
So you're against paying 3% when it probably increases your sales by 20%?
I've not bid on items because they didn't take PayPal.  PayPal is great,
instant payment, not having to hold items until checks clear, not having to
go to the bank or post office to get money orders, etc...

Lee

>I missed that one, Matthew, thanks...I have been REAL busy lately and
> just can't read everything...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> may even dump it entirely.  I went years without it anyway...
> Studebaker George
Studebaker George - 23 Feb 2008 00:54 GMT
I can't really see where it has increased my sales by that much.  I am
of the opinion that if someone wants it bad enough, they will get off
their lazy butts and get a money order.  Maybe a "handling
fee"...instead of a paypal directed fee...could say to "email me for
discount details"...
I still think paypal is just another ripoff pain in the a.s.  I will
continue to use it for now although I will probably get pissed and
dump it in future.
Studebaker George
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 01:01 GMT
If you don't like PayPal, don't use it and don't accept it.  Simple enough.
Hell you can tell people that you want hand delivered cash... see how that
affects the bidding numbers.

Lee

>I can't really see where it has increased my sales by that much.  I am
> of the opinion that if someone wants it bad enough, they will get off
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> dump it in future.
> Studebaker George
John Poulos - 23 Feb 2008 14:53 GMT
Unless it's a item I must have, I won't even bid on auctions that
don't take PayPal. I won't take a trip up to the Post Office for a money
order to buy a small part. If figure my time is worth more then the part.

> I can't really see where it has increased my sales by that much.  I am
> of the opinion that if someone wants it bad enough, they will get off
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> dump it in future.
> Studebaker George

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 GT Hawk
63 R2 GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
57 Wagon
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 15:09 GMT
I've pulled bids after re-reading the fine print, "no PayPal, no personal
checks".  For me to go to the post office or stand in line at the credit
union would be at least an hour of my time for the complete round trip.  In
the past if it were under $20, I'd risk it and send cash... now I don't bid.

Lee

>    Unless it's a item I must have, I won't even bid on auctions that don't
> take PayPal. I won't take a trip up to the Post Office for a money order
> to buy a small part. If figure my time is worth more then the part.
me@notanywhere.net - 23 Feb 2008 01:36 GMT
>So you're against paying 3% when it probably increases your sales by 20%?
>I've not bid on items because they didn't take PayPal.  PayPal is great,
>instant payment, not having to hold items until checks clear, not having to
>go to the bank or post office to get money orders, etc...
>
>Lee
For $60 a month I can get set up to accept CC's..

in 19 years, lost 5 sales totaling probably $125 cause i WONT take
CC's.

lets see, $720 times 19 years=$13,680... NO WAY would that make a
case to take CC's FOR ME.

--Shiva--

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 01:38 GMT
For free you can get set up with PayPal and accept credit cards... but still
have to pay the 3% fee.

Lee

> For $60 a month I can get set up to accept CC's..
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> lets see, $720 times 19 years=$13,680... NO WAY would that make a
> case to take CC's FOR ME.
zoombot - 23 Feb 2008 00:07 GMT
It seems to me (and a few others) that eBay is tired of fooling with
"the little guys (and gals)", and want to keep the big money sellers.
Somewhere I read that eBay could lay off 4,500 people if they didn't
have to settle the troubles of small sellers.
However, eBay claims that they want to keep every dollar they can
possible make of anyone who wants to sign in.

With eBay Motors about to "spin off" from the main site, and GM making
deals with eBay Motors to sell it's used cars thru the online giant -
not to mention WalMart wants to sell NEW cars on eBay - who's to say
where this mess will end up?

Will we go to Craig's List, or some other new effort will sprout up? I
just want it to hurry up and resolve itself, but of course.......
Jerry Forrester - 23 Feb 2008 00:39 GMT
M&H forum?????????
JF

> Seems to me that Ebay's recent crap has left the door open for another
> company to step in and at least take a chunk of their market; i.e. the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Studebaker George
> (One of the "little" sellers that is getting stomped on...or out?)
John Poulos - 23 Feb 2008 14:50 GMT
I'm pretty neutral on the ebay changes since the tilt is toward the
bigger sellers. Since I'm a Powerseller, my fees will go down with the
poweerseller fee discounts. As a buyer, I'd hate to see any of the small
sellers go away.
e

> M&H forum?????????
> JF
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> Studebaker George
>> (One of the "little" sellers that is getting stomped on...or out?)

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 GT Hawk
63 R2 GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
57 Wagon
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

James - 23 Feb 2008 01:45 GMT
If you charge a fee for a customer using MC,Visa or Amex you leave
yourself open to some pretty hefty fines from the card companies, up to
$100K per occurance and termination of your contract.

> Seems to me that Ebay's recent crap has left the door open for another
> company to step in and at least take a chunk of their market; i.e. the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Studebaker George
> (One of the "little" sellers that is getting stomped on...or out?)
Studebaker George - 23 Feb 2008 01:54 GMT
Sheesh, all this goes back to what I said...
Less is better...no paypal...no extra paperwork or "trail"...
No fees...    NO fees..
So what if you don't squeeze that extra nickel out of your part...less
headache is worth $$$$$ in MY book...
Dumping paypal is starting to look better and better...and I know a
couple vendors that I have bought from over and over  again...NO
paypal...
Studebaker George
Bill Glass - 23 Feb 2008 02:36 GMT
Some magazine publishe an article about E-Bay's potential strike of sellers.
I cannot remember which on-line magazine. It was not a Blog or some such
thing. In the article there was a re-print of an E-Bay/Pay-Pal rule,
pertaining to feedbacks and Pay-Pal.

Under certain circunstances, if a seller does not leave a positive feedback
for a buyer, Pay-Pal has the right to withold payment for 21 days or until
feedback is left.

This afternoon I recieved an e-mail from E-bay asking me to fill out a
questionaire. It asked which items I buy the most. Then it sent me more
questions based on the items I said I either buy or sell.

For the two major catagories I entered it asked questions about would I like
other E-bay buyers to know what I am bidding on, would I like my name and
address posted in my sales, would I like my photograph shown, and would I
like alerts when certain items I buy came up. It went on for about 8 pages.

From what I gather from reading the questionaire, they might be looking into
revamping the way items are sold and bought. There was no discussion of fees
or Pay Pal, but more about how much information was displayed about either
the buyer or the seller. The major question that took me by surprise was
"would you be interested in an expert to detrmine the authenticity of an
item?"

BG
> Sheesh, all this goes back to what I said...
> Less is better...no paypal...no extra paperwork or "trail"...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> paypal...
> Studebaker George
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 03:11 GMT
Why is dumping PayPal better?  All it costs you is 3% if the buyer wants to
use it.  For me the $1.50 fee on a $50 sale it's not worth having to go to
the bank and stand in line to deposit the check, especially when I'd burn a
gallon of gas round trip.  That's less headache to me.

Lee

> Sheesh, all this goes back to what I said...
> Less is better...no paypal...no extra paperwork or "trail"...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> paypal...
> Studebaker George
Jerry Forrester - 23 Feb 2008 03:20 GMT
Heh, why do both of you think you are going to convince the other to see
things your way?
YOU AINT! Heh, heh, heh.:-)
BTW, I accept Paypal only (for ebay purchases). My store, my rules.
JF

> Why is dumping PayPal better?  All it costs you is 3% if the buyer wants
> to use it.  For me the $1.50 fee on a $50 sale it's not worth having to go
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> paypal...
>> Studebaker George
me@notanywhere.net - 23 Feb 2008 04:50 GMT
Ok, using MY experiences here in this group, I realize some of you
have gotten screwed over..

Someone somehow gets my email addy (its wrong on another web site but
I cant get the thing changed-not MY web page)
and we converse-can I make a key for such and such.. they send me the
locks, I make keys and mail back, along with note- you owe me xx $..
I have NEVER gotten shafted YET, by anyone here..

 within the last 2 weeks, I ahve went to a highly restricted web site
and in an auction, purchased about  (at retail) $2500-3,000 worth of
merchandise. The man wanted payment by check.. Sent him checks, he
received same, and THAT DAY mailed out the merchandise. not even
waiting for the check to clear.. now, admittedly this group has a LOT
of faith in each other.. almost 3,000+ members.. asking for an item,
if anyone has got one, can get replies of: yeah I got that, send me
your sanil mail and I will send same.. and no money is ASKED.

DO I trust pay pal? no, not yet.. about the only way I would is
opening up a separate account at some other bank and using that acc
for THAT ONLY..

the places here(and there are some) that DO add on a processing fee-
thats interesting that they are not supposed to..
The way around THAT is like some others do- MIN charge on a CC is
$10.
97% of my customers are NOT retail.. auto shops or businesses- and
for the most part, they write checks.

as for a retail customer paying with a CC, why should I pay pay pal
or whoever $6-9 PER sale, when that can be in MY pocket..

--Shiva--

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee - 23 Feb 2008 06:19 GMT
I go to the bank occasionally anway....   On a recent sale of a $1500
item, the eBay fees were $92.  I would add to that about $45 if I'd
accepted PayPal on the sale.  Somehow, close to 10% in fees was more
than I could stomach and clealy stated NO PayPal on this auction.  The
buyer was more than happy to send a check for it.

I am getting ready to drop the PayPal payment acceptance unless
someone SPECIFICALLY asks to pay that way.  For the first 9 years I
sold on e-Bay I did not accept it and did quite well.  I've only had a
couple guys really want the PayPal convenience as I have always
accepted personal checks as well and shipped immediately if they were
SDC members.  

>Why is dumping PayPal better?  All it costs you is 3% if the buyer wants to
>use it.  For me the $1.50 fee on a $50 sale it's not worth having to go to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> paypal...
>> Studebaker George

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Studebaker George - 23 Feb 2008 12:25 GMT
Lee D. is on the same page as I am.  My bank is very close to my shop;
I pass it a couple times a day.  The post office is right around the
corner from that and I also pass a satellite post office a couple
times a day.  Inconvenience?  Not for me.  This country is way too
lazy...  I recon my mind is now completely made up, after my current
round on ebay I will can paypal.  I am a small seller and ten per cent
is too much.  That is taking the "gravy" right off the top.  If I lose
three per cent in sales and don't pay the ten per cent, the math is
obviously still in my favor.  Like Lee, I didn't do paypal for years
and got along just fine.  Like I said, if someone wants it bad enough
they will get off their duff and get a money order. Chances are that
person will be more informed about what they are buying and less
likely to be a "couch potato buyer".  Also less likely to be a
problem.  I like Lee's taking checks from SDC members idea and will
use that.  Thanks Lee D. for once again being the level headed voice
of reason..<g>
Studebaker George
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 14:28 GMT
<SNIP>
> If I lose
> three per cent in sales and don't pay the ten per cent, the math is
> obviously still in my favor.

What "math" is that?   PayPal is 3%, where are you coming up with 10%?  Why
not drop E-Bay all together because those leeches are taking more than 3% of
your sale in commissions and listing fees.  Why not put your parts in the
paper... wait, they charge a fee.  Maybe you can put up a flyer on the
bulletin board at the grocery store... if you can justify the cost of the
paper and ink/toner.

Lee
Lee - 23 Feb 2008 17:56 GMT
The math is simple....   The $1500 sale cost me over 6% total eBay
fees...   Add to that the 3%+ in PayPal fees and eBay gets close to
10% of the sale.  I'll eat the eBay fees because of the market it
makes available but I don't want to throw away another 3% just for
convenience's sake.

It is just as easy for someone to mail me a personal check (like I
said I don't hold SDC members' checks for 10 days) as it is to do a
PayPal transfer.  There is no special trip to the bank or P.O. to get
a money order and I am sure that 99% of America still sends payment
for a few bills by check.

><SNIP>
>> If I lose
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Lee

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
John Poulos - 23 Feb 2008 18:23 GMT
Lee, I see your point, but a check adds a few days to the total shipping
time since the check has to get to you. I still pass up non PayPal
auctions when possible.  Besides, I'll forget to write a check, be out
of stamps, or just don't want to bother. Yea, I'm just that lazy. <g>

> The math is simple....   The $1500 sale cost me over 6% total eBay
> fees...   Add to that the 3%+ in PayPal fees and eBay gets close to
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62

Signature

JP/Maryland
Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com
My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
64 R2 GT Hawk
63 R2 GT Hawk
63 Lark 2 door
57 Wagon
51 Commander
39 Coupe Express
39 Coupe Express (body)

Lee - 23 Feb 2008 18:39 GMT
Yeah, I know you're lazy  <G>....   Being a Power Seller as well, it
will be interesting to see what these new fees structures actually
mean to my bottom line when all is said and done.

Most of the time, it costs me more than 10% of my total sales to go to
a meet (sometimes a LOT more) so I should not bitch about the eBay
fees plus PayPal fees.  I have pretty much decided that, even though I
hate the fees, I will sell most all my parts via online auctions
rather than spending a day or two loading, 3-4 days going to and
returning from a show, and a day putting everything away.  I enjoy
vending but not THAT much any longer.  Also, with the online auctions,
I can start it at my 'asking price' and not have people try to beat me
up on price.  If the item does not sell, I can lower my price or sit
on it for a while without the aggravation of someone wanting to buy a
$100 part for 30 bux and cause me grief because I want to recover the
cost of attending the meet to, basically, hand deliver the parts to
them!

I should also look at the percentages more than the total dollar cost
involved in completing an eBay/PayPal transaction.  If it costs me $10
to sell a $100 item it is easier to swallow than paying $146 on a
$1500 sale though <G>...

>Lee, I see your point, but a check adds a few days to the total shipping
>time since the check has to get to you. I still pass up non PayPal
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>> Lee DeLaBarre
>> Daytona62

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Lee Aanderud - 23 Feb 2008 18:59 GMT
I understand where the 10% (total percentage) comes from but George seemed
to be having problems with the PayPal 3%, but E-Bay's 7% is acceptible.  I
don't know what he sells but I'm guessing it's mostly parts (under $100
transactions).  PayPal is a service just like E-Bay... you just have to
decide how much you're willing to pay for the transaction.

I accept PayPal, but I set a limit where I won't accept it... when I sold
the '62 convertible I didn't accept PayPal.  For everything else I have.  I
guess everyone has their limit... if I sell something for $10, I'm not going
to go off over the 30 cent PayPal charge... but I'm not going to give PayPal
$30 on a $1000 sale.  I don't think PayPal is a bad thing and should just be
tossed out all together by sellers.  It looks like E-Bay is going to up
their commissions, is that going to have people dropping E-Bay too?

The same goes for buying, I don't have a problem getting a money order or
bank check for a $1000 purchase, but I do for a $10 purchase.  Money Orders
and Bank Checks purchases institute a $1-$5 fee, add postage on top of that.
Then add in the extra 3-4 days for the seller to ship.

But like I have said, there are things I've looked at bidding on, then saw
they didn't take Paypal so I passed on the item.  So in fact, by not
accepting PayPal may have actually cost the seller money in the end...
because we all know in an auction, all you need is two people wanting the
item.

Lee

> The math is simple....   The $1500 sale cost me over 6% total eBay
> fees...   Add to that the 3%+ in PayPal fees and eBay gets close to
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
Lee - 23 Feb 2008 21:15 GMT
I agree with most of what you've said.  The paypal fees up to $3k are
2.9% + $0.30.  So, in reality, on a $10 sale, it is costing the seller
5.8% to accept PayPal.  That drops off, of course as the dollar amount
gets higher.  To me, almost 6% + eBay fees, percentage wise, on a $10
sale is crazy.  If you sell a LOT of $10 to $50 items, you end up
paying anywhere from 3.5% to 5.9% to PayPal.  Over a lot of small
transactions, that adds up quickly.  Percentage wise, you'd be a lot
better off accepting PayPal for a $2k sale than 40 $25 sales.  On the
one big sale, you'd pay $58.30 vs $82.00 on the lot of smaller ones...

To put this in REALLY scary terms, say you list an item for a $10
starting price.  Your listing fee is $0.55 or 5.5%.   Then, the item
sells for you starting price ($10).  Your final value fee is 8.75% of
the final auction price or $0.88.  Then, you accept PayPal on that $10
sale at a cost of 5.8% to the seller.  

It does not take long to realize that on a simple $10 sale, you have
just given away 20.05%, or just over two dollars of the ten dollars
you listed the part for!  

If these were all $50 sales the TOTAL fees for insertion, final value,
and PayPal would range from 9.8% to 11.625% or anywhere from $4.91 to
$5.81 per $50 sale (depending on starting bid price).  These are all
simple, no-extra auctions.  

IF you were to add one picture, a reserve of any kind, and have a $25
starting bid, you are at a 12.4% eBay cost plus the 3.5% PayPal
cost...   15.9% or $7.97 in fees on a $50 item is again getting high.

I'm not going to drop e-Bay as a venue to sell my stuff...   It is
very convenient and does get the word out to a LOT of people in a
hurry.  I just don't understand being upset because a seller wants to
limit his costs at the e-Bay fees only and not add to his costs by
anywhere from 3.5% to 5.8% by accepting PayPal.  

I, too, am sure that it has cost me some sales by not accepting PayPal
on some auctions or possibly that it has cost me one or two extra bids
on an item.  I guess it's a choice I make and will have to live with.
Also, I don't mind someone making a FAIR commission on my listings
but, up to 20% on a simple $10 sale is pushing it.

>I understand where the 10% (total percentage) comes from but George seemed
>to be having problems with the PayPal 3%, but E-Bay's 7% is acceptible.  I
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>> Lee DeLaBarre
>> Daytona62

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Jerry Forrester - 24 Feb 2008 00:02 GMT
Compare all the ebay and paypal fees to the expense of a store setting on
the side of a highway (my building is paid for, but I still have repairs,
lights, water, gas, telephone, insurance etc., etc., etc.) and I think you
will agree the ebay and paypal fees are a good deal. I have both an ebay
store and a store on the side of the highway and I guarantee you I make more
profit per item with the ebay store than I do with the physical store.
Jerry

>I agree with most of what you've said.  The paypal fees up to $3k are
> 2.9% + $0.30.  So, in reality, on a $10 sale, it is costing the seller
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
Studebaker George - 24 Feb 2008 01:02 GMT
Wow, a lively discussion..nice to see on the 'ol newsgroup!  I see a
lot of very valid points.  Jerry, you are right, the differences in
cost of the old time "brick and mortar" place and the internet is
quite large.  I am NOT a "buisness" per se, and ebay started out as a
place for us "little guys" to basically garage sale our stuff.  The
world's largest garage sale.  Ever been to a garage sale and try to
pay for an item with paypal or a credit card?  For us "little guys",
the associated hassle with paypal and now all it's additional rules is
a little much.  For now, ebay  is still the best and pretty much the
ONLY...and I will continue to use it.  I do see a market potential for
just the old car people, though, as Hemmings used to be before the
internet came along.  As far as Paypal and their nonsense, I recon
it's time to make a small statement and go back to the way I started.
Paypal is just another middleman with his hand groping in the jar.
Another way to keep a log and a trail.
 Bye bye paypal.
Studebaker George
BTW, some of my very best and liveliest auctions were way before I
started taking paypal.  Yes Lee A., all you need is two people...and
if they want it bad enough, they will fight like crazy (gambling rush,
ya know!) and then get their a.ses to the post office and cough up a
money order...
Lee - 24 Feb 2008 03:50 GMT
I won't argue with you at all on that one, Jerry...  

>Compare all the ebay and paypal fees to the expense of a store setting on
>the side of a highway (my building is paid for, but I still have repairs,
[quoted text clipped - 114 lines]
>> Lee DeLaBarre
>> Daytona62

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Bob - 26 Feb 2008 22:32 GMT
I can see all sides of the debate and all things considered it is a better
way than the swapmeets in my eye with one exception.I sell only small parts
on ebay.It's a great way to move NOS or used parts.I do not sell sheetmetal
or large items bigger than a oversize 1 box.Too much of a pain in the a..  I
have done it in the past but gave it up.I take paypal or postal money orders
only and have not gotten one complaint. My auctions used to include money
orders  from credit unions,banks,etc.but after getting some from places like
"Luthers Feed-Seed Wagon Works and Money Orders" and The First National Bank
of United States of Ameritus(California branch) I dropped  those types.If
buyers can go to a credit union they can go to a post office.I'll probably
make the trip to swap at Lancaster but here is something about that to
consider.It's 1,130 miles one way...thats 2,260 round trip.At 13 mpg thats
roughly 173 gallons of diesel.Using the current rate of $3.45 my math says
around $600 for fuel.Hotel for 8 nights @$90 is another $720. 6 swap spaces
outdoors adds $180. Just for fun I'll guess $320 for meals,beverages,snacks
for the week ($40.00 a day...I eat well,sue me)although thats a
variable.Thats $1,820 in the red column before I even set up or sell a
part.36-40 hours of drive time plus sitting at the space and as Lee D wrote
the loading up for and unloading after.I can sit at home and sell a lot of
parts on ebay rather than spending the time on the road.All the cost aside
I'll probably still be there.

Bob40...infrequent poster so using up air space when I do
>I won't argue with you at all on that one, Jerry...
>
[quoted text clipped - 127 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
me@notanywhere.net - 27 Feb 2008 02:01 GMT
>thats 2,260 round trip

IF you are a business, that deduction per mile is .53 or so cents
per?
around 1200 right there..

--Shiva--

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee - 27 Feb 2008 04:50 GMT
The 'deduction' does not mean a lot, really....   that .53/mile is
taken off your income, not your tax directly...   You'd be lucky to
clear $300 in 'real money'

>>thats 2,260 round trip
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>--Shiva--

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
Lee Aanderud - 27 Feb 2008 13:32 GMT
I just did my taxes and wrote off a trip to ND, total write off was $1095
(actual expenses)... increase in tax return was right at $200.  So about 20
cents on the dollar for "you can just write it off" folks.

Lee

> The 'deduction' does not mean a lot, really....   that .53/mile is
> taken off your income, not your tax directly...   You'd be lucky to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Grumpy AuContraire - 27 Feb 2008 17:24 GMT
Well, just consider it "mad" money and go right out and spend it so the
economy can get goin' again.

Don't buy any Studebaker stuff since such is no longer in the economic
pipeline. Spend it a Wallywoild etc.

JT

> I just did my taxes and wrote off a trip to ND, total write off was $1095
> (actual expenses)... increase in tax return was right at $200.  So about 20
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>Lee DeLaBarre
>>Daytona62
Lee Aanderud - 27 Feb 2008 18:24 GMT
Screw Walmart, until they open up more than 2 of the 26 registers I'm pretty
much done with that place.

Lee

> Well, just consider it "mad" money and go right out and spend it so the
> economy can get goin' again.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>Lee DeLaBarre
>>>Daytona62

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Grumpy AuContraire - 28 Feb 2008 02:24 GMT
You just have to live in a more "progressive" place...

JT

(equal opportunity at all checkouts)

> Screw Walmart, until they open up more than 2 of the 26 registers I'm pretty
> much done with that place.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>>>>Lee DeLaBarre
>>>>Daytona62
Grumpy AuContraire - 27 Feb 2008 17:21 GMT
Ya gotta luv da guv'ment.

When I was getting regular payments for mileage back in the late 1990's
I'm sure that the rate was near 40¢ per mile.  Considering that gas has
more than tripled, inflation is much more than they admit to and you
have a recipe for a decline in the standard of living.

I'm lookin' for a horse that doesn't eat too much...

JT

> The 'deduction' does not mean a lot, really....   that .53/mile is
> taken off your income, not your tax directly...   You'd be lucky to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Lee DeLaBarre
> Daytona62
Lee - 23 Feb 2008 17:53 GMT
I'm far from level-headed at times, George...  Have only been burned a
very few times from SDC guys.  It's a small enough community that I
generally know someone who knows the offender and can call on them in
a pinch to put a bit of pressure on the bad guy <G>

>Lee D. is on the same page as I am.  My bank is very close to my shop;
>I pass it a couple times a day.  The post office is right around the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>of reason..<g>
>Studebaker George

Lee DeLaBarre
Daytona62
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.