Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / March 2008
Chrysler design center in SoCal to shut.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Karl Haas - 13 Mar 2008 23:53 GMT These are the guys, in Carlsbad, who brought you the Prpwler.
20 to get ax, including engineers, clay moulders, engineers, artists...IIRC, this was the first US manufacturer to set up one in this area, followerd by others, mostly overseas firms.
zoombot - 14 Mar 2008 00:05 GMT Heck, Karl - Chrysler is closing down the whole shebang in July for 2 weeks and sending everyone home for vacation.
Karl Haas - 14 Mar 2008 00:42 GMT > Heck, Karl - Chrysler is closing down the whole shebang in July for 2 > weeks and sending everyone home for vacation. I know, but that is temporary, I guess. This design group is forever, unless another firms picks them up as they walk out the door. Pasadena isn't that far away, and there might be room at the School of Design. (Teaching filling in unemployment forms?)
I worked for over 12 different firms (that I can remember) in my career and left four of them on my own. Smallfiorms are so much more enjoyable, challanging, and shakey! Two firms I was at three times, sometime as an employee and other times as a temp / consultant.
I also did telemarketing and bringing cars back to life in the fallow periods
me@notanywhere.net - 14 Mar 2008 04:55 GMT OK, show me an AMERICAN MADE car that gets over 30MPG, that is AMERICAN OWNED.. Does Ford, GM, Chrysler have ANY vehicle in production that everyone can go buy that gets BETTER THAN 30MPG by the common Joe Blow? NOT the EPA rating but actual anyone can get this? no
Close, perhaps..but no cigars
I drive a 'Ford'. its a 92, and gets about 37MPG, and that for this model is BAD-it should get by talking to others, closer to 48mpg by everyone. It is NOT American made but a re branded vehicle, foreign made My wifes ex boss's car gets 53+MPG ALL THE TIME..its Foreign. also
EVERYONE needs a $65,000 7mpg vehicle to take a half grown kid 2 miles to 2nd grade.. NOT!!!! but I see it all the time. a HUMMER????
was listening to an ad today on the radio from a railroad of all things.. they were BRAGGING that it cost them 1 gallon of diesel to move 1 TON of freight 453 miles down the tracks.. these stupid SUV's to be EQUAL MUST GET over 250MPG to equal a railroads efficiency.
I CANNOT walk into ANY dealership and get a reasonable small van that will get 20mpg and haul a few tools.. ITS NOT MADE..
After seeing some of the asinine engineering CRAP produced by the big 3, I have NO sympathy for any of them..
$800 brake hub for a GM car for 1..the OTHER side is $275. 8 HOURS labor to put on a water pump.. right. 80 HOURS for a wiring harness for a CD changer? sure thing..
in MY line of work, a 99 to 04 Malibu-car wont start, security light on dash flashing.. fix you right up, takes 20-25 minutes.. and $400 and BTW, it MIGHT do it AGAIN the VERY NEXT TIME you start the car..
--Shiva--
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Grumpy AuContraire - 14 Mar 2008 05:41 GMT Boy, did you nail it on the head...
I now drive an ancient '83 Honda Civic FE daily. 42mpg in mixed driving and it always starts 'n goes. Nice stereo, no "Check Engine" light, no 'puter.
Went to visit Barry in Houston three weeks ago and drove 75-85 mph and still got 42mpg. Anything in Deeetroyt do that???
Worse, izzit me or are the new cars getting fuglier than ever? The Chrysler stuff looks like a giant step backwards...
JT
> OK, show me an AMERICAN MADE car that gets over 30MPG, that is > AMERICAN OWNED.. [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > --Shiva-- me@notanywhere.net - 14 Mar 2008 14:48 GMT >Boy, did you nail it on the head... > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >JT I had to go see the local Ford dealer boss for a lock problem of his and while I was waiting, looked on a new Mustang window..
$56,000 as it was, plus the options, PLUS EPA of 17mpg. 14 city. finance this for 6 years, IGNORING the interest, you are paying 10 grand on principal. and GAS???
another point.. back in the OLD days, I needed a 6 cylinder plain Jane vehicle.. no power this, no fancy stuff, just a good 'driver'. YOU CANNOT EVEN ORDER ONE now. its not allowed.
--Shiva--
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Lee Aanderud - 14 Mar 2008 15:03 GMT > another point.. back in the OLD days, I needed a 6 cylinder plain > Jane vehicle.. no power this, no fancy stuff, just a good 'driver'. > YOU CANNOT EVEN ORDER ONE now. > its not allowed. > > --Shiva-- Talk to their fleet vehicle sales manager. Do you think NAPA or Advance Auto Parts purchase loaded delivery vehicles? You can still get 4-speed, rubber floor mat, vinyl bench seats, etc. in one vehicle.
BTW - I know someone who's company added "manual windows and locks" into the spec sheet that went out for bids, the trucks came back with manual windows and locks listed as a $700 option to a crew cab truck.
Lee
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Itsfrom Click - 14 Mar 2008 16:10 GMT 2 cents worth:
Chrysler design center: wasn't their first "clean sheet" product the Pacifica?.......all that hoopla about......a station wagon!!!! And the top didn't even slide open!
mpg: I just completed a 2800 mile trip in my '06 Ford Five Hundred......it got 25 mpg overall, including 3 weeks around town at my destination, mountain driving, etc. On highway, it got 28 mpg per tankful. I consider that pretty good for something with so much room and comfort, big trunk filled with vacation clothes......especially since the AWD and CVT are each supposed to eat 1 mpg.
my "toy" is a '06 Mustang GT convert......only 1100 miles in 2 years so it isn't broken in yet.....but it gets 20 mpg in town, despite a heavy foot. seems reasonable to me.
on the other hand: Ford vehicles are individually weighed at the factory with the weight printed on the window sticker......the 'Stang is a convert and heavily optioned....but it has an all-alluminum engine, tranny case, rear axle housing, plastic and aluminum hood and trunk.......and it still weighs 3816 pounds........gees!!!!!! (btw, neither car has been back to the dealer yet because they were both "zero defects")
yeah, I've had some real gas hogs in the past......but my first car was a '56 Packard: supremely comfortable and luxurious road locomotive: an engine that weighed 800 pounds, 310 horsepower, fast, dual quads, handled like a kiddie car despite it's size, all the gizmos available then and weighed over 5000 pounds.........and got 15 mpg no matter how you drove it. How much progress have we really made? (yeah, it polluted and changing the mufflers every 2 years was a trip to the poorhouse, but that was in the iron age).
And even tho' gas was cheap back then, Packard/Studebaker/Bendix were working on electronic fuel injection to improve mileage. Again, what if..........?
Lee Aanderud - 14 Mar 2008 14:46 GMT Is this a surprise to people? I know small - medium sized production plants that have been doing this for years/decades. The only people who stay around those two weeks are maintenance people who inspect and repair machinery.
Lee
> Heck, Karl - Chrysler is closing down the whole shebang in July for 2 > weeks and sending everyone home for vacation.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
me@notanywhere.net - 14 Mar 2008 19:17 GMT >Is this a surprise to people? I know small - medium sized production plants >that have been doing this for years/decades. The only people who stay >around those two weeks are maintenance people who inspect and repair >machinery. > >Lee wanna bet the line workers sill get their pay?
--Shiva--
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Lee Aanderud - 14 Mar 2008 20:42 GMT >>Is this a surprise to people? I know small - medium sized production >>plants [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>Lee > wanna bet the line workers sill get their pay? Why wouldn't they, along with everyone else... I haven't read anywhere where the plant was shut down for two weeks without pay. I'm not sure how this is even newsworthy? Several large plants shut down the week between Christmas Day and New Years Day... I don't read about that in the newspaper.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
ALEX M. - 15 Mar 2008 04:26 GMT But that is part of the problem with American car companies. They pay people to not make cars. I bet most foreign car companies do not pay their hourly workers when they send them home for two weeks.
>>>Is this a surprise to people? I know small - medium sized production >>>plants [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Christmas Day and New Years Day... I don't read about that in the > newspaper. jeep4cyl@aol.com - 14 Mar 2008 16:01 GMT Guys,
I drive a 2002 Ford Escape, 4cyl & 5-spd with Full Time 4-WD. I have a K&N Air Filter, and a Gibson Cat-back System w/o the mufler. I drove to my sisters running 65 to 75 mph and got 29.6mpg and 30.3mpg. It has Power Brakes Steering Air and Cruise. I now have 81,000 on it and it drags my loaded 4x6 trailer to Tennessee at 60 to 70 mph, while it is loaded, and still gets 24 to 26 mpg.
I think this is a remarkable vehicle. However, it was hard to find as no local dealers stocked the 4cyl.
Geno 64 Daytona Convertible 64 R2 Avanti
Studeman - 14 Mar 2008 16:24 GMT My 1993 Ford Ranger extended cab- AC, Pwr Windows, Mirrors, Steering, Brakes, 4.0L 5-speed.. No modifications at all. In average driving, I usually saw 27+ MPG everywhere I went. Never below 25 MPG.. even with the bed stuffed to the gills under a fiberglass high-rise cap. I pulled my wife's Hawk to Bloomington Mn. on an 18' open car trailer, and the bed had 2-weeks of luggage and supplies for the trip (tools, extra things for the Hawk, a set of 4 radial tires/rims for driving after the show, floor jack, etc..). I averaged 17.9 MPG round trip. On the "flats" from Cinncinatti to Chicago, it got slightly over 21MPG. The lowest return was 14MPG through the mountains of Va/W-Va on I-77.
Loved that truck... Ray
>Guys, > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >64 R2 Avanti > me@notanywhere.net - 14 Mar 2008 19:20 GMT >My 1993 Ford Ranger extended cab- AC, Pwr Windows, Mirrors, Steering, >Brakes, 4.0L 5-speed.. No modifications at all. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Loved that truck... >Ray want mine? 96, automatic..same motor.. THE BEST we ever get is 17 unloaded. normal is 15 --Shiva--
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|