Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fuel Prices... again...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dale J. - 06 Apr 2008 21:24 GMT
Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per US
gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry had
kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would all be
driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government and big
oil won't let that happen now, will they...
Grumpy AuContraire - 06 Apr 2008 22:20 GMT
As someone once said, "There's no such thing as a free lunch," so goes
it for the auto/big oil industry.

Those computers that whiz you much faster these days also consume a lot
more energy than that Commodore 64 of yesteryear. Still, speed is
good... sometimes.

Regarding oil prices..  It's the speculators who determine prices based
on hysteria, greed public gullibility.  Add to this poor energy policies
by the guv'ment and our insatiable appetite for motor vehicles, and
well, you gits what you got.

I for one took action a couple years ago in the form of "reconditioning"
an old '82 Honda Civic that gets around 42mpg in mixed driving.  It's
paid for and I have a ton of spare parts. Studebakers now are the luxury
occasional experience.

JT

> Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per US
> gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry had
> kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would all be
> driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government and big
> oil won't let that happen now, will they...
Mike hunt - 06 Apr 2008 22:40 GMT
Do you mean the big government that passed all of those overly restrictive
environmental laws that led to the higher prices, distribution problems and
fewer refineries?   The same government that makes more on the gas you
purchase at the pump, than the oil company that provides the gas?   That big
government that sill will not allow drilling our countries vast oil and
natural gas reserves?   The price of crude is determined by the speculators
that invest in the commodities market, not the oil companies or the
government

Every time the price of fuel goes up the Congress or the Senate holds
hearing and browbeat the bosses of the American oil companies that are owned
by those Americans that invest in those companies.  Have you EVER seen a
report from any of the Congressional or Senate hearings?   Did it ever occur
to you why you never read any of their conclusions in the press?    The
results of those hearing is ALWATYS the same, the price increase is the
result of supply and demand   LOL.

> Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per
> US gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry
> had kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would
> all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
> and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...
Dale J. - 10 Apr 2008 01:22 GMT
Here's some interesting links that may help to explain too why "big oil" charges so much too...:

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS; Ousted Chairman of Shell Got $1.93 Million Package
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E2D91638F935A15755C0A9629C8B63

Demoted Executive Quits Shell, Taking $1 Million in Severance
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/08/business/worldbusiness/08shell.html?_r=1&oref=
slogin


Severance pay could bring an epic payday for saying goodbye
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/4914331.html

"In the past, shareholders were blindsided by some big parting packages, like the $400 million received by former Exxon Mobil Corp. CEO Lee Raymond the year he retired,"

   For the life of me I can't find one article I am looking for that commented on a Shell executive who retired about a year or 2 ago and stated that, with his pension, stock options and all the other bells and whistles he got after, I think it was 3 years service, the total value was OVER $6 BILLION!  And we wonder why gas costs so much...
Jeff DeWitt - 07 Apr 2008 04:24 GMT
> Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per US
> gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry had
> kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would all be
> driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government and big
> oil won't let that happen now, will they...

The computer industry?  The same industry that built my X60 laptop that
takes a very expensive Li-Ion battery that will run for about 5 hours on
a charge?  The same industry that built my Tandy 100 that will run for
WEEKS on 4AA batteries?!?

Plus if your car was like a PC (or even a MAC) every once in a while it
would quit running or all it's controls would lock up for no apparent
reason.

Annoying in a computer, disastrous in a car!
jimandkathiekrise - 07 Apr 2008 13:28 GMT
And in spite of the hardships imposed by the fuel prices, NOT ONE taxing
agency, has offered to back down on taxes.

Seems that the oil companies are not the only greedy organizations about
these days.

> Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per
> US gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry
> had kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would
> all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
> and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...
Grumpy AuContraire - 08 Apr 2008 18:25 GMT
If you are contending that the "taxing" agency(s) are those that collect
gas taxes, don't expect any relief there.  In fact gas tax collections
are way down when viewed from a historical and actual perspective.

Traffic counts are down in most areas and when coupled with more
economical cars, funding for highways (new and maintenance) is dropping.

OTOH, gas price is governed by hysteria (speculation) and manipulation
by big oil. For example, last year when oil prices fell below $50 per
barrel, they managed to manipulate gas prices upward to around $3 per
gal and this year even with the high oil prices, claims of shortages are
just not true.  There is plenty of product but again, manipulation is
taking place.

But, this is nothing new, right?

JT

> And in spite of the hardships imposed by the fuel prices, NOT ONE taxing
> agency, has offered to back down on taxes.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
>>and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...
Barry - 09 Apr 2008 05:37 GMT
Shortages are maintained by restrictions on drilling and making huge
reserves of oil unavailable to development to satisfy environmental
lobbyists. Energy producers are  free to raise their prices due to the
shortage of oil  created by the Congress, so they can write some nice tax
deductable checks to the various
environmental pressure groups so they can continue to fleece the public and
erode freedom & property rights by spreading their BS about so-called global
waring..
Isn't it funny how those people keep fighting against development & drilling
, but never utter a peep about the invasion of millions of unassimilable
aliens into the country who will use water & energy, pollute the air with
the emissions from their vehicles, dump their garbage(especially soiled
diapers) into the environment and cause zillions of trees to be dozed to
make room for more housing, schools, and infrastrtucture.
Anyone truely concerned with the environment would make the immigration
invasion their top priority issue.
Barry'd in Studes

> If you are contending that the "taxing" agency(s) are those that collect
> gas taxes, don't expect any relief there.  In fact gas tax collections are
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
>>>and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...
keith_kichefski@wed.dresser.com - 09 Apr 2008 14:32 GMT
It is easy to blame big oil for the sharp rise in prices at the pump,
but they are not necessarily to blame.  Everyone has probably heard of
"Futures Markets".  People speculate on what any given commodity might
be worth in the future and bid on it.  With oil running around $108
bbl. it stands to reason that someone had to bid on it, at that
price.  If there are no speculators to bid at those prices, it drops
in value.  The same thing is happening to home prices, as buyers are
hoping prices drop more, before jumping in.
If you don't like the high prices of other things, those are most
likely also being run up by the 'futures market'.
While all of this 'fragile speculation' of commodities is running
rampant, it is just the latest up and coming debacle.
Not long ago we had the corporate book-cooking fiasco, that resulted
in Sarbanes-Oxley, having affected Tyco, Global Crossing, Enron and a
host of others.
After that came the housing crisis, brought about by shady lenders and
appraisers, hoping they could sell their 'inflated paper risk' to
someone else.  This worked for a while and became global.
Now banks are afraid to lend, because they can't find a buyer for the
risk.  Hence the 'credit crisis'.
Shady operators just jump from one thing to another thing, that is big
at the time.
That is until they get rounded up and "Do Time", while someone else
fills their shoes, inventing the next great debacle.
If enough people reduce their consumption of any given item, the
prices drop until the market resumes buying.
This goes for gasoline, food, houses AND Studebakers.
Grumpy AuContraire - 09 Apr 2008 23:58 GMT
I'm with you.

Round up all the speculators, execute 'em on teevee and corral the rest
of shady operators and make 'em do time in the 'big house' breaking rocks.

I'm wondering when the average American sheeple will take back his/her
rights...

JT

> It is easy to blame big oil for the sharp rise in prices at the pump,
> but they are not necessarily to blame.  Everyone has probably heard of
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> prices drop until the market resumes buying.
> This goes for gasoline, food, houses AND Studebakers.
ah - 11 Apr 2008 14:42 GMT
> I'm with you.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> JT

You gotta' be kidding, right?  With obama & hillary the democrat party front
runners in the upcoming election, do you think the people in this country
will ever wake up in time?  ROFL And McCain ain't no bargain either.  Sadly
enough....
Grumpy AuContraire - 12 Apr 2008 03:52 GMT
>> I'm with you.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> country will ever wake up in time?  ROFL And McCain ain't no bargain
> either.  Sadly enough....

I think that I'll spend the next four years in the PI and just party
'til I cain't walk.  Maybe I'll even find a used Studebaker to tool
around in...

JT
Dale J. - 10 Apr 2008 01:02 GMT
> It is easy to blame big oil for the sharp rise in prices at the pump,
> but they are not necessarily to blame.  Everyone has probably heard of
> "Futures Markets".  People speculate on what any given commodity might
> be worth in the future and bid on it.  With oil running around $108
> bbl. it stands to reason that someone had to bid on it, at that
> price.

   HANG the speculators!  When oil FIRST hit over $100 BBL it was tracked
to ONE PERSON who says he did it just to prove that he could.  He immediatly
turned arround and SOLD those shares AT A LOSS of over $600.  He did it on a
lark.
Grumpy AuContraire - 10 Apr 2008 18:38 GMT
>>It is easy to blame big oil for the sharp rise in prices at the pump,
>>but they are not necessarily to blame.  Everyone has probably heard of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> turned arround and SOLD those shares AT A LOSS of over $600.  He did it on a
> lark.

Yes, but it helped pave the way to current prices by establishing a new
threshold.

JT

(who thinks that all speculators should be shot)
Grumpy AuContraire - 09 Apr 2008 23:55 GMT
But there are no shortages.  This is concocted entirely by big oil in
concert with the guv'ment and speculators. This administration has
presided over a nearly 400% rise in energy prices, double digit
increases in food prices et al.

I am no longer in favor of drilling but favor a changeover to new
technology.  It is time to bury the internal combustion engine. It is
only a matter of time where electric vehicles will be the norm and
hopefully most power will not be generated by fossil fuels.

Of course, I really don't care a whole lot as my little gas sippin'
Honda just passes by gas stations one after another...

JT

> Shortages are maintained by restrictions on drilling and making huge
> reserves of oil unavailable to development to satisfy environmental
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>>>>all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
>>>>and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...
doug holverson - 10 Apr 2008 00:43 GMT
> But there are no shortages.  This is concocted entirely by big oil in
> concert with the guv'ment and speculators. This administration has
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I am no longer in favor of drilling but favor a changeover to new
> technology.  It is time to bury the internal combustion engine.

Except for the Studebakers!

DGH
Grumpy AuContraire - 10 Apr 2008 18:36 GMT
>> But there are no shortages.  This is concocted entirely by big oil in
>> concert with the guv'ment and speculators. This administration has
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> DGH

Not to worry, the internal combustion engine would be around for
sometime which in itself would lower fuel prices.

Simple evolution indicates though that it is time for new technology
which is within grasp.  All it would take is strong national leadership
(like the JFK "go to the moon" program) to bring it about.

It certainly is in our national interest to limit our consumption to
product(s) that we can produce domestically.

I'm sure that we'll still be driving our Studebakers well into the future...

JT
George Mills - 25 Apr 2008 21:39 GMT
Time for the manufacturers to start selling Kei cars...and every other one a
3 cyl diesel turbodiesel like the Smart car (was), that can go 80 mph all
day long and still get better than 60 (US) mpg, including running the AC.

A neighbour has averaged about 75 mpg Imperial (about 60 per US gallon)
since new with his Smart, and still gets about 83 (66 US) on long trips at
65 mph+.   He drives a lot with his. (he can afford to)

Jim B on PEI

>>> But there are no shortages.  This is concocted entirely by big oil in
>>> concert with the guv'ment and speculators. This administration has
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> JT
Mike hunt - 26 Apr 2008 00:29 GMT
People are grumbling about the price of gasoline and there are plenty of
cars on the market that get 30 MPG or more and plenty that can get more than
35 MPG.  The fact is buyers apparently do NOT want to buy the cars that get
36 MPG.   They will settle for 30 MPG to get a vehicle that suits there
needs and wants.    Look at what they are buying, the number one seller, for
most every manufacturer, is not their midger or small car but their midsize
cars.    Take note of what you see on the highways, people are still driving
as fast and a far as ever and I still see a lot of campers and motor homes
on the roads.

What we should be concerned about is the price of diesel fuel.    Up until
the end of 2007, before the newest federal regulation for diesel fuel, the
average cost of diesel fuel was 50c LESS than regular gasoline.  Since the
regular went into effect diesel in now 50c a gallon MORE than premium
gasoline.  Diesel trucks only get around 6 MPG.     Everything we buy is and
will continue to go up, because everything we buy is transported by truck.
Even the food we eat us produced by using diesel fuel.

> Time for the manufacturers to start selling Kei cars...and every other one
> a 3 cyl diesel turbodiesel like the Smart car (was), that can go 80 mph
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Jim B on PEI
Grumpy AuContraire - 26 Apr 2008 06:05 GMT
> People are grumbling about the price of gasoline and there are plenty of
> cars on the market that get 30 MPG or more and plenty that can get more than
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> will continue to go up, because everything we buy is transported by truck.
> Even the food we eat us produced by using diesel fuel.

Which illustrates the ignorance of transporting commodities long
distance by truck when rail is a lot more efficient.

Trucks should be limited to local deliveries in surrounding areas near
major rail hubs.

JT
me@notanywhere.net - 26 Apr 2008 16:03 GMT
>Which illustrates the ignorance of transporting commodities long
>distance by truck when rail is a lot more efficient.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>JT

CTX?? was running an ad on NPR recently over that fact..
they stated that the AVERAGE cost of transporting anything by rail is
436 MPG per loaded ton.

to make that in perspective, your POS Ford SUV that gets 7 MPG would
have to get at LEAST 250 MPG to equal what the trains can do.

As far as the lots of cars get over 30 mpg-  I walked into my local
Ford AND GM dealer and ASKED- you got ANYTHING AVAILABLE that gets a
REAL 30mpg, NOT that crap EPA rating, and BOTH said NO.

Ford has a hybrid but it is highly NOT recommended you use it for
highway driving at all- its fine surburban or city but not on a 30
mile trip one way.

GM's I dont know about, but they are not in any demand around where I
am for some reason.
I see some Prius now and then, and if I was looking at a good MPG
vehicle that would be it.

NEITHER Ford or Chevy as far as I have seen make ANYTHING small that
gets over 20 mpg epa rating.  Was looking at a price sticker on a new
ranger, as equipped it was $38k, and the epa rate said 17 mpg.

Sorry-not interested.

--Shiva--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Grumpy AuContraire - 27 Apr 2008 05:30 GMT
>>Which illustrates the ignorance of transporting commodities long
>>distance by truck when rail is a lot more efficient.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> --Shiva--

Which is exactly why I resurrected an ol' '83 Honda Civic that gets an
honest 42 mpg in mixed driving. While I paid a whopping $100 for the car
in 2005 and poured another $500 into it, it's paid for, cheap to insure
and is virtually glued to the highway like a sports car.

And, even the radio works!

JT
me@notanywhere.net - 27 Apr 2008 15:58 GMT
>Which is exactly why I resurrected an ol' '83 Honda Civic that gets an
>honest 42 mpg in mixed driving. While I paid a whopping $100 for the car
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>JT
I have a 92 Ford Festiva, milage sucks, I only get 36, and should get
45+..LOL

--Shiva--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Comatus@bex.net - 07 Apr 2008 15:59 GMT
"But the government and big oil won't let that happen now, will they..."

I find your theories intriguing, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Paul  Johnson - 07 Apr 2008 18:56 GMT
> Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per
> US gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry
> had kept up with progress and R&D like the Computer industry has we would
> all be driving 500 HP cars that get 80 MPG at 80 mPH.  But the government
> and big oil won't let that happen now, will they...

Unfortunately, fuel prices aren't the only thing affected by oil prices.  I
suffered major sticker shock Saturday when I got a fertilizer bill.  Urea
(nitrogen)- $515.79/ton, 18-46-0- $925.32/ton and potash (potassium)-
$605.26/ton.  Fewer than five years ago the 18-46-0 was $249/ton and potash
was $157/ton.
Paul Johnson
Grumpy AuContraire - 08 Apr 2008 18:26 GMT
Paul Johnson wrote:

>>Gas here just went up the other day to $1.239 per liter (that's $4.69 per
>>US gallon or $5.63 per Imperial gallon).  WTF?!?   If the Auto industry
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> was $157/ton.
> Paul Johnson

Um, jis wot do youse plan w' all dat urea?

<G>

JT
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.