I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.
Truck tapered axles are not a problem. They are a lot heavier than the
passenger car axles.
JT
> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are
> tapered axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>> Thanks in advance for your help.
>> Allen
>I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
>They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
>for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.
good luck finding one, but a Ford Torino has a 9", and fits QUITE
NICELY under my Hawk.
late 80's??
--Shiva--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
> axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
> They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
> for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.
Alex, Thanks for the Reply.
I tried to have the 8" Ford axles drilled with the 5 on 5" bolt
pattern, but the fine folks at Curry tell me that the diameter of the
axle flange is to small to drill at that pattern. They say that 4 3/4"
diameter is as large as it can go.
I would replace the rear end with a Ford 9" unit from someone like
Curry, but when you add all the parts up, it is at least $2500 not
counting shipping.
Does anyone know what rear ends will swap into the narrow body truck?
I could get one from a wrecking yard and put gears, bearings and
brakes on it, and if it was a 9" Ford, I could get axles drilled for
the 5 on 5" pattern.
I could use a car rear end, but if I am not mistaken, they are the
smaller bolt pattern as well.
Thanks
Allen
Transtar60 - 26 Apr 2008 18:19 GMT
I would find a Champ rear end with 4.10/4.11's. The Champ rear is 3"
wider but thats only 1 1/2 per side. Theres enough room under the wide
or narrow box fender wells for the extra width. AFAIK the spring plates
and the shock mounts are welded on the tube in the same place.
The truck Dana 44's (referred to as Spicer 2211 in the shop manual) have
thicker axles and bigger bearings than the car units.
Never seen one fail or have the axle break.
Course they already have the right bolt pattern.
>> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>> axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks
> Allen

Signature
2R10
2R14
3E38
4E3
4E28
5E13
7E7
8E7
8E12
8E28
etc etc
ALEX M. - 27 Apr 2008 04:40 GMT
It sounds like several people have a Stude rear end for you and that would
be the way to go.
But the 9 inch route does not have to be so expensive as the Curry option.
I found a Ford rear end in the junk yard for $150 and then paid $250 for a
good used posi unit center section that had the gear ratio I wanted.
>> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>> axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks
> Allen
salstude@gmail.com - 27 Apr 2008 05:57 GMT
Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
for the Stude pickup?
Another idea is to get a Ford truck 9" rear end with the flange axles.
they have a 5 on 5 1/2 pattern which will have plenty of room to be
drilled for the 5 on 5 pattern. I know a guy who will narrow a 9" rear
for only a few hundred dollars. He is an expert machinist and is in
Northern CA. Let me know if this is something you would want to
consider. He did the 9" under my 54 Coupe some years ago and its been
great. I've used a couple different ratios in it. Its the ideal rear
for someone who wants that option.
Allen Siekman - 27 Apr 2008 14:53 GMT
On Apr 26, 9:57 pm, salst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
> for the Stude pickup?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> great. I've used a couple different ratios in it. Its the ideal rear
> for someone who wants that option.
I like the idea of doing a Ford 9" and will start looking for a used
unit. The Chevy is an option as well, but I have no working knowledge
on which Chevy rears might be compatible.
Does anyone know the flange to flange width for the stock rear end?
The Ford 8" that I have in the truck now was out of a Mustang and was
not the exact width, but close. If anyone has a stock rear and could
measure it for me, it would really help in finding the best fit or if
I have a wider one narrowed, it would give me the width to work to.
THANKS!!!
ALEX M. - 28 Apr 2008 16:49 GMT
If possible, try to find one you don't need to narrow. There were several
widths available. The stock axles taper down to a smaller diameter just past
the splines. If you narrow the axles there is not enough metal to machine
new splines. That means you have to have custom axles made for about $600.
> On Apr 26, 9:57 pm, salst...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> THANKS!!!
Studebaker Kid - 06 May 2008 10:32 GMT
You need to watch the GM differentials as there is a service bulletin
that only dealers know about. For many years in the 80s GM used too
soft a steel for the axle shafts and as a result the ends would wear
down to the point that the clips would pop off and then an axle would
slip out of the housing. The service bulletin had specifications for
wear and once the limit was met then the axles met the specification
for warrantee replacement. The problem was with all GMs not a
specific model.........even seen the problem in some TT Corvets.
As for the nine inch Ford that is the way I went for the Toyota Tcab
and it fits just fine. Pulled the differential out of a mid 80s Heavy
Half ton.