Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Studebaker / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Truck Rear End Needed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Allen Siekman - 26 Apr 2008 00:31 GMT
Hi All
I have a '51 2R5 that is running a 289 V8 with 3 spd OD transmission.
Some years back when I was probably not thinking straight, I put a
Ford 8" rear end in it, thinking that I would be easier to have for
the long haul.

The rear end has 4:09 gearing and it has served me pretty well, but
there have always been a few problems. First of all it is a 5 on 4
1/2" bolt pattern instead of the 5 on 5" that the truck has on the
original rear end. That makes having a spare a bit of a problem since
the fronts and rears are different.

Secondly, and not to critical is that the stock hub caps don't fit and
the wheel spacing is off, causing a lot of grief.

The latest and most serious problem is the fact that the drivers side
axle bearing has come apart, depositing ball bearings and other pieces
of metalic debris into the rear end center section. Lots of not to
loud, but not to good of noises coming from it in the last few
miles.....

So, what to do?
I could rebuild it or replace it.
I could go to Curry and have them build me a Ford 9" with the 5 on 5"
bolt pattern and the proper width for the truck, but that would be
pricey!!!

Do you have a solution?

Here is what I would ideally need.
A Twin Traction rear end with 3:80  or so as a ratio. 5 on 5" bolt
pattern and the proper width.
Barring that, how about a stock rear end with the same ratio that I am
running now (4:09) or down to the 3:80 range. Single traction is OK.

OR, maybe someone has a different rear end swap that works well.

You can email me at allen at ebold dot com or give me a call at 831
336-3621.
I am in the San Francisco Bay area.

Thanks in advance for your help.
Allen
ALEX M. - 26 Apr 2008 03:46 GMT
I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
axles then you want to avoid them.  How about another used 8" or even a 9"
They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.

> Hi All
> I have a '51 2R5 that is running a 289 V8 with 3 spd OD transmission.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Allen
Grumpy AuContraire - 26 Apr 2008 06:09 GMT
Truck tapered axles are not a problem.  They are a lot heavier than the
passenger car axles.

JT

> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are
> tapered axles then you want to avoid them.  How about another used 8" or
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>> Thanks in advance for your help.
>> Allen
me@notanywhere.net - 26 Apr 2008 16:04 GMT
>I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>axles then you want to avoid them.  How about another used 8" or even a 9"
>They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
>for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.

good luck finding one, but a Ford Torino has a 9", and fits QUITE
NICELY under my Hawk.
late 80's??

--Shiva--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Allen Siekman - 26 Apr 2008 16:47 GMT
> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
> axles then you want to avoid them.  How about another used 8" or even a 9"
> They come in several widths and I think you can have the axles re-drilled
> for the correct pattern. Let's see what others think.

Alex, Thanks for the Reply.
I tried to have the 8" Ford axles drilled with the 5 on 5" bolt
pattern, but the fine folks at Curry tell me that the diameter of the
axle flange is to small to drill at that pattern. They say that 4 3/4"
diameter is as large as it can go.

I would replace the rear end with a Ford 9" unit from someone like
Curry, but when you add all the parts up, it is at least $2500 not
counting shipping.

Does anyone know what rear ends will swap into the narrow body truck?
I could get one from a wrecking yard and put gears, bearings and
brakes on it, and if it was a 9" Ford, I could get axles drilled for
the 5 on 5" pattern.

I could use a car rear end, but if I am not mistaken, they are the
smaller bolt pattern as well.

Thanks
Allen
Transtar60 - 26 Apr 2008 18:19 GMT
I would find a Champ rear end with 4.10/4.11's.  The Champ rear is 3"
wider but thats only 1 1/2 per side.  Theres enough room under the wide
or narrow box fender wells for the extra width. AFAIK the spring plates
and the shock mounts are welded on the tube in the same place.

The truck Dana 44's (referred to as Spicer 2211 in the shop manual) have
thicker axles and bigger bearings  than the car units.

Never seen one fail or have the axle break.

Course they already have the right bolt pattern.

>> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>> axles then you want to avoid them.  How about another used 8" or even a 9"
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks
> Allen

Signature

2R10
2R14
3E38
4E3
4E28
5E13
7E7
8E7
8E12
8E28
etc etc

ALEX M. - 27 Apr 2008 04:40 GMT
It sounds like several people have a Stude rear end for you and that would
be the way to go.
But the 9 inch  route does not have to be so expensive as the Curry option.
I found a Ford  rear end in the junk yard for $150 and then paid $250 for a
good used posi unit center section that had the gear ratio I wanted.

>> I'm not that familiar with the trucks. If the stock rear ends are tapered
>> axles then you want to avoid them. How about another used 8" or even a 9"
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks
> Allen
salstude@gmail.com - 27 Apr 2008 05:57 GMT
Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
for the Stude pickup?
Another idea is to get a Ford truck 9" rear end with the flange axles.
they have a 5 on 5 1/2 pattern which will have plenty of room to be
drilled for the 5 on 5 pattern. I know a guy who will narrow a 9" rear
for only a few hundred dollars. He is an expert machinist and is in
Northern CA. Let me know if this is something you would want to
consider. He did the 9" under my 54 Coupe some years ago and its been
great. I've used a couple different ratios in it. Its the ideal rear
for someone who wants that option.
Allen Siekman - 27 Apr 2008 14:53 GMT
On Apr 26, 9:57 pm, salst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
> for the Stude pickup?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> great. I've used a couple different ratios in it. Its the ideal rear
> for someone who wants that option.

I like the idea of doing a Ford 9" and will start looking for a used
unit. The Chevy is an option as well, but I have no working knowledge
on which Chevy rears might be compatible.

Does anyone know the flange to flange width for the stock rear end?
The Ford 8" that I have in the truck now was out of a Mustang and was
not the exact width, but close. If anyone has a stock rear and could
measure it for me, it would really help in finding the best fit or if
I have a wider one narrowed, it would give me the width to work to.

THANKS!!!
ALEX M. - 28 Apr 2008 16:49 GMT
If possible, try to find one you don't need to narrow. There were several
widths available. The stock axles taper down to a smaller diameter just past
the splines. If you narrow the axles there is not enough metal to machine
new splines. That means you have to have custom axles made for about $600.

> On Apr 26, 9:57 pm, salst...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Aren't the Chevy truck rear ends 5 on 5 patterns? Are they too wide
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> THANKS!!!
Studebaker Kid - 06 May 2008 10:32 GMT
You need to watch the GM differentials as there is a service bulletin
that only dealers know about.  For many years in the 80s GM used too
soft a steel for the axle shafts and as a result the ends would wear
down to the point that the clips would pop off and then an axle would
slip out of the housing.  The service bulletin had specifications for
wear and once the limit was met then the axles met the specification
for warrantee replacement.  The problem was with all GMs not a
specific model.........even seen the problem in some TT Corvets.

As for the nine inch Ford that is the way I went for the Toyota Tcab
and it fits just fine.  Pulled the differential out of a mid 80s Heavy
Half ton.
Grumpy AuContraire - 26 Apr 2008 06:07 GMT
> Hi All
> I have a '51 2R5 that is running a 289 V8 with 3 spd OD transmission.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Allen

Barry just picked up a 4.09 TT from me last week.  It would be perfect
for an OD truck.

JT
Oujdeivß - 26 Apr 2008 23:49 GMT
I have a Dana 44 from a 57 pick laying about, shipping may be an issue
though :)

Where are you at?

> Hi All
> I have a '51 2R5 that is running a 289 V8 with 3 spd OD transmission.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Allen

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.