Confirming/identifying '50 Champ engine by number

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Jersey2J - 20 Jun 2008 07:12 GMT

We were told that our '50 Champion had a '53 engine - something about
the '53 engine being 1" longer and obstructing the installation of a
standard fuel pump.

I finally checked the engine number, 536180 (with a #2 below it), and
it looks like the engine indeed belongs in a 9G '50 Champ.

Resource: http://www.studebakerdriversclub.com/tech_6data.asp

Can anyone confirm/clarify for me?

Thanks again!

http://studebakerguide.blogspot.com/

Reply to this Message

Dwain G. - 23 Jun 2008 01:57 GMT

No, sorry, what you have found is the cylinder head number for a head
that was orginally installed on '55-'57 Champions.
At the very top, front, left (driver's) side of the engine block is a
smooth machined pad about 1/2" tall by 2" long. Find that area and
clean it off with a putty knife, wire brush, sandpaper, whatever and
tell us what you find there.
There should be no real difference between a '50 and a '53 engine, but
a lot of differences from '55-on.

Reply to this Message

Jersey2J - 24 Jun 2008 06:02 GMT

> No, sorry, what you have found is the cylinder head number for a head
> that was orginally installed on '55-'57 Champions.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> There should be no real difference between a '50 and a '53 engine, but
> a lot of differences from '55-on.

Thanks, Dwain. The number is 626,211. A '50 9G engine, right?

Reply to this Message

Dwain G. - 24 Jun 2008 17:07 GMT

Yes sir, a 1950 engine, the original engine probably. Now that we know
that, I'm not so sure whoever installed the later head did the right
thing. That 536180 head was designed to deliver 7.5 to 1 compression
ratio on a 185 engine. When installed on a 170 engine it probably
delivers at least a half point less, maybe as low as 6.5 to 1.
That's not a great big deal, so if you are okay with the way the car
runs now, I wouldn't change anything. If you do want a little bit more
power and mileage you could try to find the 1950-54 head #529279 or
the 1960 head #1549218.

Reply to this Message

Jersey2J - 25 Jun 2008 22:44 GMT

> Yes sir, a 1950 engine, the original engine probably. Now that we know
> that, I'm not so sure whoever installed the later head did the right
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> power and mileage you could try to find the 1950-54 head #529279 or
> the 1960 head #1549218.

Thanks, Dwain. An amazingly precise answer to my question. I
appreciate your time and thoughtful response. The process of
researching our Champ has started a fire in me to evangelize the
Studebaker brand - a great history and a great automobile.

Best regards,
Jason

Reply to this Message

Dwain G. - 26 Jun 2008 05:29 GMT

You're welcome Jason, it was a pleasure! I do enjoy hunting down these
numbers and trying to identify parts.

Reply to this Message