Hi Guys,
Does anyone out there have a set of Studebaker factory aluminum key
blanks for 1950-59 cars with Yale lock they are willing to part with?
These would be the hex headed ignition key and the round headed trunk
key. They have the Studebaker name on one side and Yale on the other.
I'd like to get a set and cut them for my 56J!
Thanks,
-George-
-56 Golden Hawk
-63 GT Hawk
-63 Champ
Dan Kay - 05 Dec 2008 22:24 GMT
Funny thing, I was thinking just yesterday that I needed to come up with new
keys for my 61 Lark - they are about worn out, I see a day when jiggling
them in the ignition doesn't do a damn thing anymore.
Dan Kay
61 Lark VIII 4D Regal
62 Lark VI Daytona convertible
> Hi Guys,
> Does anyone out there have a set of Studebaker factory aluminum key
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> -63 GT Hawk
> -63 Champ
me@notanywhere.net - 07 Dec 2008 04:46 GMT
use the aluminum FOR SHOW.. but brass for every day..
--Shiva--
EchoDelta - 06 Dec 2008 13:54 GMT
There is currently a set of four keys listed on Ebay at the following
link: http://tinyurl.com/5r2oys
Ed
>Hi Guys,
>Does anyone out there have a set of Studebaker factory aluminum key
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>-63 GT Hawk
>-63 Champ
me@notanywhere.net - 07 Dec 2008 04:49 GMT
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:54:55 -0500, you wrote:
>There is currently a set of four keys listed on Ebay at the following
>link: http://tinyurl.com/5r2oys
>
>Ed
dont think they are alumininum tho
the third from left wasnt made in it, AFAIK.. its too small
--Shiva--
Itsfrom Click - 07 Dec 2008 13:30 GMT
Well, this question has been festering for 46 years, so I'll ask:
aluminum seems to the dumbest material to make keys ..... were they so
much cheaper to the maker, or was there some other reason to use them?
I can well remember the day I went with Mom to trade her '55 Prez
hardtop in on a new '62 Hawk........the GT was just so beautiful (so
was the '55, but we were tired of having the rust repaired).
HaHa.....gorgeous as the GT was, something seemed sort of chintzy: the
carpet, the vinyl seats were stiff and the rear trunk overlay was a
cheap imitation of the real "grill" on the back of Lincolns. And the
'55 had "real" keys instead of those cheap aluminum jobs that we hated
on Dad's Chryslers.
We'd often leave the car unlocked rather than risk having to unlock it
with the key......'specially in winter when the locks were even stiffer.
They'd get bent and eventually break. For the life of me, I don't know
why we didn't just have good copies made at a key shop.
I thought for a while that maybe the aluminum keys were easier on the
ignition......but over the years have had plenty of worn-out ignitions
to replace, so that wasn't it. Almost as mystifying as second-gear
start!
me@notanywhere.net - 09 Dec 2008 15:15 GMT
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:30:26 -0500, you wrote:
>aluminum seems to the dumbest material to make keys ..... were they so
>much cheaper to the maker, or was there some other reason to use them?
cheaper, the 'new fad' as well, and stayed shiny instead of the
brass that got 'dirty'..
--Shiva--
RBK. - 08 Dec 2008 16:49 GMT
>If you know the key number.I have many N.O.S. cut keys.
If you do not have the key number you can get a birth certificate
( factory order) from the Studebaker
Museum and that will have the original key numbers on it.
I have a large selection of keys and locks going back to the late
30's.
R.Kapteyn
studebaker@mac.com
me@notanywhere.net - 09 Dec 2008 15:14 GMT
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:49:34 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>>If you know the key number.I have many N.O.S. cut keys.
>If you do not have the key number you can get a birth certificate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>R.Kapteyn
>studebaker@mac.com
In the locksmith area we got 'reverse software'..
let me measure the key and get the depths..
say they were 13244.. plug that into our software and we can
reverse lookup the code number..
tis not a problem.
--Shiva--