
Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
The offset appears to be right. Their 'Subaru' rims that are 7.5 inches wide
have an offset of 48, and the 7 inch wide ones are from 50 - 53...
Tried to Google 'HubCentric', but couldn't find a definitive answer. Would
you (or anyone :]) mind explaining what that means? If the offset is
correct, are they by definition 'hubcentric'?
Thanks!
> Unless your mind is made up - check the Koseis there and the Rotas at
> www.subydude.com
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> --
> to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 26 Apr 2004 23:34 GMT
The hole in the rim where the axle nut cap sticks through is a 'perfect'
fit. The idea being the weight of the car rests there instead of on the
lugnuts. Wheels with a larger diameter hole can be supplied with filler
rings. Probably not a show stopper but that's how it is meant to work.
btw - there are sometimes WRX and STi takeoffs availble on various
forums(www.nasioc.com and www.i-club.com) and ebay as others upgrade
their stock alloys. fyi
Carl
1 Lucky Texan
> The offset appears to be right. Their 'Subaru' rims that are 7.5 inches wide
> have an offset of 48, and the 7 inch wide ones are from 50 - 53...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>--
>>to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
Rory - 27 Apr 2004 03:27 GMT
> The hole in the rim where the axle nut cap sticks through is a 'perfect'
> fit. The idea being the weight of the car rests there instead of on the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Carl
> 1 Lucky Texan
Thanks! That makes sense. Guess more research is required re: Kazera rims