Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Subaru Cars / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Subaru 2000 Legacy -- Brakes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Surendar Jeyadev - 27 May 2004 19:24 GMT
Today I learnt that my Subaru 2000 Legacy wagon, with 49,000 miles on it,
needs front brakes and the rear brakes need to be refaced. Is this a bit
early? My previous two Subarus (1984 GL10 and 1992 Legacy) went to
85K+ miles without brake problems. I am not driving any differently!
Signature


Surendar Jeyadev         jeyadev@wrc.xerox.bounceback.com
                       
                        Remove 'bounceback' for email address

Jim Stewart - 27 May 2004 20:07 GMT
> Today I learnt that my Subaru 2000 Legacy wagon, with 49,000 miles on it,
> needs front brakes and the rear brakes need to be refaced. Is this a bit
> early? My previous two Subarus (1984 GL10 and 1992 Legacy) went to
> 85K+ miles without brake problems. I am not driving any differently!

I get 40k on the front (with 2/3 the meat
left on the pad) and 80k on the rear
(about 1/2 the meat left).  Have never
had to change the rotors.
Edward Hayes - 27 May 2004 20:25 GMT
My 2000 Forest @ 68,000 miles has about 1/3 on front and 1/4 on rear
remaining. Is your new Legacy heaver than you old cars?
> Today I learnt that my Subaru 2000 Legacy wagon, with 49,000 miles on it,
> needs front brakes and the rear brakes need to be refaced. Is this a bit
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>                          Remove 'bounceback' for email address
Surendar Jeyadev - 28 May 2004 22:01 GMT
>My 2000 Forest @ 68,000 miles has about 1/3 on front and 1/4 on rear
>remaining. Is your new Legacy heaver than you old cars?

Not really. It is a wagon, as opposed to the sedan versions, but the
2000 Legacy was roughly the same in size and shape. Looks like my
front brakes went early. The rear ones are supposed to be okay.

I was really just wondering if this was a known problem with the
2000 Legacies. Looks like an outlier.

Signature

Surendar Jeyadev         jeyadev@wrc.xerox.bounceback.com
                       
                        Remove 'bounceback' for email address

Todd H. - 01 Jun 2004 04:56 GMT
> Today I learnt that my Subaru 2000 Legacy wagon, with 49,000 miles on it,
> needs front brakes and the rear brakes need to be refaced. Is this a bit
> early? My previous two Subarus (1984 GL10 and 1992 Legacy) went to
> 85K+ miles without brake problems. I am not driving any differently!

FWIW, my 01 OBW was down to nothing on an edge of the driver's front
pad at 60000 miles.  

My Mazda 626 went nearly 100k on the original pads.

I just figure  they're pretty heavy cars, and this one I owned full
time here in Chicago doing lotsa stop and go.

--
Todd H.
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
Chicago, Illinois USA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.