Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Subaru Cars / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

AEM cold air intake with bypass valve

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Patrick F. Clarin - 08 Jun 2004 14:50 GMT
Can anyone think of a reason why I wouldn't get a bypass valve when putting
a cold air intake on my '02 WRX?  It doesn't lessen the airflow through the
intake does it?
Bryan Lee - 08 Jun 2004 15:57 GMT
No.  It so if water splashes your car wont die.
> Can anyone think of a reason why I wouldn't get a bypass valve when putting
> a cold air intake on my '02 WRX?  It doesn't lessen the airflow through the
> intake does it?
CompUser - 08 Jun 2004 16:40 GMT
> Can anyone think of a reason why I wouldn't get a bypass valve when putting
> a cold air intake on my '02 WRX?  It doesn't lessen the airflow through the
> intake does it?

You're talking air bypass valve, AKA blow off
valve?

The only "advantage" to adding one is the sound-
effect.  It will degrade performance.  Check
Cobb's forum, for Gary Sheehan's (pro Subaru
rally driver) comments on atmospheric BOVs.

Stock intake system is considered to be a non-
issue up to 300 HP.

Steve
Patrick F. Clarin - 08 Jun 2004 17:41 GMT
No I'm talking about the bypass valve so water won't be sucked up through
the cold air intake.  If they offer this why would anyone not get it since
it will save your engine?

> > Can anyone think of a reason why I wouldn't get a bypass valve when putting
> > a cold air intake on my '02 WRX?  It doesn't lessen the airflow through the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Steve
CBK - 09 Jun 2004 03:29 GMT
I run an AEM cold air without a bypass. It does slightly degrade the
performance as it is a deviation from the normal dynamic of the pipe. The
horsepower loss from the bypass valve is said to be between 2-5, depending
on the application and placement of the valve. I'm not that piddly, that's
not why I don't use it. My filter terminates about 6-7" off the ground. If I
ever have the car in water that deep +4-5" to submerse the filter
completely.... well... I just wouldn't drive in water that deep. I don't
have a bypass valve because I'm not going to hydrolock the engine. easy as
that. If you want peace of mind and can forsee driving through 7-10" of
water... by all means get one. 3hp is a small sacrifice when compared with
the cost of engine replacement.

> No I'm talking about the bypass valve so water won't be sucked up through
> the cold air intake.  If they offer this why would anyone not get it since
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Steve
CompUser - 09 Jun 2004 03:40 GMT
> No I'm talking about the bypass valve so water won't be sucked up through
> the cold air intake.  If they offer this why would anyone not get it since
> it will save your engine?

Okay, now I'm tracking ya...

...I'd guess the answer would be that people who
put those kinda filters on, and people who think
about *protecting* the engine, are in two
mutually exclusive groups!

Note what that "bypass valve" is doing, when it
functions, too...it's letting in totally
UNfiltered air.

Neither item makes any sense on a WRX intake,
which is pretty well recognized as capable at
anything below 300HP...I lost track of what
wheels you have.

Steve
JaySee - 10 Jun 2004 04:03 GMT
>> No I'm talking about the bypass valve so water won't be sucked up through
>> the cold air intake.  If they offer this why would anyone not get it since
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>functions, too...it's letting in totally
>UNfiltered air.

Bypass valve is filtered.

>Neither item makes any sense on a WRX intake,
>which is pretty well recognized as capable at
>anything below 300HP...I lost track of what
>wheels you have.
>
>Steve
Dave - 20 Jun 2004 16:41 GMT
It has been proven time and again that 99% of WRX's recieve NO gains
whatsoever from a cold air intake, and in fact many people report problems
stemming from them.  Mainly this is due to improper MAF mount diameter, and
the big bend right before it causing turbulence.

A CAI is a VERY poor performance investment on a WRX to begin with, as an up
pipe will provide REAL gains in hp and torque, as well as improved spoolup..

Check out these sites,
www.nasioc.com
www.i-club.com

Ask around in there about cold air intake and see what you get. Nasioc has a
VERY knowledgeable userbase (for the most part).

> >> No I'm talking about the bypass valve so water won't be sucked up through
> >> the cold air intake.  If they offer this why would anyone not get it since
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >
> >Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.