definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
reports often list the info for the base version even when they test
the HO version. I did not read the article though and am surprised
they made such a mistake as premium is usual listed as a con or
negative.
ALL the SUV's tested stated "regular", mentioned right in the pages of the
report, but, not in the individual specifications.
I went to a dealer, to get the 2007 Forester booklet, but, they didn't have
one, so, I downloaded and printed it from Subaru.com, and, it states 87
octane for all but the XT, and, 91 octane for the XT.
I'm in Colorado, and, while 85 IS regular, neither 87 nor 91 are, and, I
smell something fishy.
Will write CR and see what they say...
> definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
> reports often list the info for the base version even when they test the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Thanks.
SuperPoo - 06 Aug 2006 15:47 GMT
> ALL the SUV's tested stated "regular", mentioned right in the pages of the
> report, but, not in the individual specifications.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'm in Colorado, and, while 85 IS regular, neither 87 nor 91 are, and, I
> smell something fishy.
Huh? What's fishy? All of Subaru's turbos run on premium. CR made a mistake.
Steve
> Will write CR and see what they say...
>> definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>
>>> Thanks.