Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Subaru Cars / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Regular gas in 2007 Forester 2.5 XT?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Bradley - 06 Aug 2006 01:21 GMT
The Consumer Reports article for July, 2006, states "regular" for the
Forester 2.5 XT fuel requirement.

Is this correct?  Thought it had to be 91 octane Premium?

Thanks.
Edward Hayes - 06 Aug 2006 02:32 GMT
definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
reports often list the info for the base version even when they test
the HO version. I did not read the article though and am surprised
they made such a mistake as premium is usual listed as a con or
negative.
> The Consumer Reports article for July, 2006, states "regular" for
> the Forester 2.5 XT fuel requirement.
>
> Is this correct?  Thought it had to be 91 octane Premium?
>
> Thanks.
Bill Bradley - 06 Aug 2006 15:33 GMT
ALL the SUV's tested stated "regular", mentioned right in the pages of the
report, but, not in the individual specifications.

I went to a dealer, to get the 2007 Forester booklet, but, they didn't have
one, so, I downloaded and printed it from Subaru.com, and, it states 87
octane for all but the XT, and, 91 octane for the XT.

I'm in Colorado, and, while 85 IS regular, neither 87 nor 91 are, and, I
smell something fishy.

Will write CR and see what they say...
> definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
> reports often list the info for the base version even when they test the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Thanks.
SuperPoo - 06 Aug 2006 15:47 GMT
> ALL the SUV's tested stated "regular", mentioned right in the pages of the
> report, but, not in the individual specifications.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'm in Colorado, and, while 85 IS regular, neither 87 nor 91 are, and, I
> smell something fishy.

Huh? What's fishy? All of Subaru's turbos run on premium. CR made a mistake.

Steve

> Will write CR and see what they say...
>> definitely needs 91 octane except for an absolute emergency. Consumers
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>
>>> Thanks.
John Griffin - 22 Aug 2006 19:31 GMT
> The Consumer Reports article for July, 2006, states "regular" for the
> Forester 2.5 XT fuel requirement.
>
> Is this correct?  Thought it had to be 91 octane Premium?
>
> Thanks.

Um, and where have you come across a 2007 Forester? Here in Canada they
haven't even been announced!
cloud dreamer - 22 Aug 2006 20:13 GMT
>>The Consumer Reports article for July, 2006, states "regular" for the
>>Forester 2.5 XT fuel requirement.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Um, and where have you come across a 2007 Forester? Here in Canada they
> haven't even been announced!

Salesman told me yesterday that the '07s would be out on Sept 15th. I
assume he means all models.

 ..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.