>>>Hi- just got a 2004 Forester 2.5X w/ 20k miles, runs great, but noticed
>>>that when I shift into drive and apply gas immediately (within 2-3
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> about Subaru's poor design.
> Unless someone beat this car like a stray coyote, this should not happen...
If the design were poor, THOUSANDS would be posting about the problem,
and Subaru would no longer exist. The problem he is ahving may very well
have been caused by ignorance/abuse and if it isn't - may be covered
under warranty.
Do you know anything about the AWD system in a Subaru? Do you know why I
wrote what I did?
Please enlighten us as to Subaru's poor design. We're waiting for your
expertise in the matter.
Carl

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
Eric Cartman - 19 Sep 2006 22:57 GMT
>> A 2 year old car...with a measly 20K miles...makes you really wonder
>> about Subaru's poor design.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Carl
I would imagine he is referring to the cooling system, the fuel rails, the
electrical system, the crappy paint, the stereo amps that catch fire...thats
just for starts....
maybe thats what he is referring to.....
Edward Hayes - 20 Sep 2006 00:01 GMT
Gee: I guess I am the lucky ONE. 111,000 miles and to date I have
replaced the following. One head light bulb, one over head clock, one
set of brake pads, 5 sets of wiper blades, 3 sets of tires. I'm sure
I've forgotten something but, what the heck, maybe my next Subaru will
be trouble free. Eddie
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 20 Sep 2006 00:04 GMT
>>>A 2 year old car...with a measly 20K miles...makes you really wonder
>>>about Subaru's poor design.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> just for starts....
> maybe thats what he is referring to.....
I know of no brand that does not exhibit those same failures plus more.
I own 2 Subarus have yet to experience any of those on your list.
Still waiting for his expertise.
Carl

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)