Hello,
I have a P0420 trouble code, that says "Catalyst Efficiency Below
Threshold". Can any one give me an idea on how to raise the efficiency of
the catalyst? My car is a '99 2.5L Legacy Outback wagon w/ 113K miles. Is
this trying to tell me I need to replace the catalytic converter on the
exhaust system? Sounds like it going to hurt my wallet. I've searched past
posting and didn't find anything. Anny and all help is appreciated.
Thanks
-Nick
mulder@x.files - 27 Sep 2006 00:42 GMT
>Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Thanks
>-Nick
Yeah sorry you can't raise the catalyst efficiency, that code is
telling you the catalyst is shot. At 113K that is not surprising.
Unfortunately you are well past the federal emissions warranty period
of 8/80 or you could have gotten a new one for free.
Depending on what state you reside in and whether you need to pass
inspection, you may be able to forgo this repair at least for the time
being (as long as you don't mind staring at the light) or you may have
to do it to pass emissions.
Nick Lamendola - 27 Sep 2006 01:16 GMT
Thanks mulder, I really didn't have much hope in raising the efficiency. I'm
just happy that my car passed NYS inspection last month. No new inspection
sticker in NY with a check engine light on. :( I don't mind having the
catalytic convertor replaced as long as that makes the code go away. I read
where it could be caused by an exhaust leak. Any idea if muffler shops can
test a catalytic convertor? I hope it is not an issue with the O2 sensors,
as that sounds like it can get you chasing your tail. Thanks again,
-Nick
>>Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> being (as long as you don't mind staring at the light) or you may have
> to do it to pass emissions.
JD - 27 Sep 2006 01:31 GMT
> Thanks mulder, I really didn't have much hope in raising the efficiency.
> I'm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> as that sounds like it can get you chasing your tail. Thanks again,
> -Nick
That's true. If the leak is before the catalytic converter. Its a much
cheaper fix though, so I'd have that checked before going to replace the
catalytic converter. If the O2 sensor goes, it throws its own code.
AS - 27 Sep 2006 01:43 GMT
Just out of curiosity, what kind of driving style do you have?
I would imagine smooth driving.
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thanks
> -Nick
Nick Lamendola - 28 Sep 2006 03:26 GMT
Nothing too hard, I rarely push it, mostly express way speeds, commuting to
work and back. Why do you ask?
-Nick
> Just out of curiosity, what kind of driving style do you have?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Thanks
>> -Nick
AS - 28 Sep 2006 04:23 GMT
I asked because when engines are not driven under demanding conditions,
carbon tends to build up on pistons and valves. Sometimes, deposits can
also be formed on oxygen sensors and catalytic converters, when cars are
driven for short distances, not allowing all these components to get
real hot.
One problem i remember due to this was the 4 cylinder camry engine, 95
model and similars, which used to develope a sticky valve syndrome,
killing one of the cylinders...
In your case, express way speeds would exclude this as a possible cause
for your problem and I second carl's suggestion.
Good luck
> Nothing too hard, I rarely push it, mostly express way speeds, commuting to
> work and back. Why do you ask?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>>Thanks
>>>-Nick
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 27 Sep 2006 03:06 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thanks
> -Nick
First, you MAY have a bad converter - however, there is a very great
chance what you have is a 'lazy' or bad lambda (O2) sensor. Has an O2
sensor ever been changed on your car?
Also, if you clear the code, do you get an immediate return of the CEL?
The only way the ECU can detect a bad converter, is comparing signals
from an upstream and downstream O2 sensor. If one of these sensors is
bad (or associated wiring) you will get that code. The diffence in cost
between a new converter and a new sensor is close to an order of
magnitude. So, even if you can't actually get someone you trust to test
the sensors (easy with a scope or even some meters) it is likely still
worth the gamble to change the sensors. If you know neither of them have
eever been replaced, definitely change the front one first and
drive/monitor the situation. If the front has been replaced in the last
50K miles or less - it may mean the after cat sensor needs replacing.
don't panic!
Carl

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
Nick Lamendola - 28 Sep 2006 03:23 GMT
Thanks Carl,
I'll take your advise. Neither O2 sensor has been replaced. I cleared the
code and it hasn't returned in my normal 70ml. round trip commute to work
today. So maybe it was just a fluke, it happend right after I gassed up my
car. If it does come back I'll start with replacing the O2 sensors.
-Nick
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Carl
Mickey - 28 Sep 2006 16:44 GMT
> Thanks Carl,
> I'll take your advise. Neither O2 sensor has been replaced. I cleared the
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>
>> Carl
Due to mileage I'm betting on bad converter. There is also
a code for bad O2 sensors so if you are not seeing that in
addition to the P0420 code my money is on the converter.
Mickey