> Yes, you are right - I didn't see that. I guess I need to test it
> with the key on and engine off to see if it reads atmospheric pressure
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>>
>>- Show quoted text -

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
Today I replaced the MAP sensor with another and the problems still
exist. MAP reads the same (about 4.5 psi - that's , but this time I
took the vacuum hose off the MAP and it read 14.5 psi (Barometric
pressure ). So it is reading right, it's just that the 10 psi
difference is the manifold pressure (vacuum), right? And you're
saying the OBDII data should be reading 9psi? Does Subaru have a
different zero point for the pressure?
No K and N filter installed an the MAF is reading good - I even
cleaned it to make sure.
Also when car is running, the OBDII says it's in a closed loop mode,
so not that.
I'm still wondering about the downstream O2 sensor reading about what
the upstream does. Catalytic converter?
Sparky
> > Yes, you are right - I didn't see that. I guess I need to test it
> > with the key on and engine off to see if it reads atmospheric pressure
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
> --
> to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
AS - 31 Aug 2007 20:30 GMT
Now you seem to have the proper change in the MAP reading reading (or
was it a typo in the original message?). Remember that the map reads
absolute pressure, so your 4.5 psi correspond to a vacuum of about 18 in
Hg. Accelerating the engine should increase the pressure, not drop it as
you stated in the original message.
The other sensors appear normal to me.
Have you tried the usual stuff? Tire pressure, alignment, air filter
replacement, spark plugs condition, ignition wires resistance, engine
compression? Is the tranny slipping, brakes sticking? Most of this
stuff can be checked without replacing anything.
Good luck!
> Today I replaced the MAP sensor with another and the problems still
> exist. MAP reads the same (about 4.5 psi - that's , but this time I
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>>--
>>to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
AS - 31 Aug 2007 21:15 GMT
By the way, do you have an emissions problem, failed a test?
> Now you seem to have the proper change in the MAP reading reading (or
> was it a typo in the original message?). Remember that the map reads
[quoted text clipped - 115 lines]
>>>
>>> Carl
brian - 31 Aug 2007 22:28 GMT
> By the way, do you have an emissions problem, failed a test?
>
[quoted text clipped - 122 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -