> Curious, just what sort of a load drain does having the lights on have on
> an alternator so that mileage is reduced?
There isn't. It's like .01 % (1/10,000) of gas consumed per mile. i.e. NO
measurable impact on gas milage. That "study" went around and got
completely debunked all over the internet in 1999 or so.
If you care about saving gas, keep your tires inflated, engine and drive
train fluids changed regularly, take the stupid-gay a.s "Thule" rack off
your roof when you are not using it, and stop driving like a retarded monkey
in heat and relax a bit. Those things will get you better gas savings than
keeping the lights off will.
Plus, with the lights on, you are less likely to have to pay for a new car
cuz someone didn't see your damn fool a.s coming at dusk or in the rain.
Buddy - 22 Oct 2007 16:10 GMT
here's .._..'s last post ->:
>> Curious, just what sort of a load drain does having the lights on have on
>> an alternator so that mileage is reduced?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Plus, with the lights on, you are less likely to have to pay for a new car
> cuz someone didn't see your damn fool a.s coming at dusk or in the rain.
I suspected that the savings would be negligible and find lights
on a great idea. I always have them on but especially at dawn &
dusk when driving with the sun behind me so others can see me. But
the 'stupid-gay' Thule rack comment was uncalled for ;-)
><<XX>:> Buddy
Dano58 - 22 Oct 2007 16:42 GMT
You know, I have nothing against DRL's (although personally, I prefer
not to have them). But some cars that use the high beams with reduced
power still are bright enough to cause a distraction when they are
behind you, even in broad daylight. Where is the safety in that?
I think most states have a 'wipers-on, lights-on' law these days,
which makes good sense.
If you REALLY are concerned about visibility, then you need to add one
of those strobe lights like some school buses have on their roofs. ;-)
Dan D
'99 Impreza 2.5 RS (son's)
Central NJ USA
nospam - 23 Oct 2007 06:02 GMT
>I always have them on but especially at dawn &
>dusk when driving with the sun behind me so others can see me.
With a light behind you sticking lights on the front is actually
camouflage.
--
hippo - 23 Oct 2007 06:52 GMT
>>I always have them on but especially at dawn &
>>dusk when driving with the sun behind me so others can see me.
>With a light behind you sticking lights on the front is actually
>camouflage.
>
>--
Couldn't agree more! My bike or car lights are on most of the time
*except* when the sun's behind me adn *especially* when it's behind me and
low in the sky. Then I want to be as big a dark blob as possible, not a
little light trying to show up against a bloody big one! Cheers
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.subaru/
More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html
Buddy - 23 Oct 2007 13:22 GMT
here's hippo's last post ->:
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.subaru/
> More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html
I understand about using lights as camouflage, the military
checked it out, but it works at when the object is on the horizon
at some distance. If you want to argue that you are better off not
running lights with the sun behind you (not just a light!) then
you need to pay more attention to the cars coming at you when you
drive into the sun and see whether those with lights are invisible
to you. I'm not 17 and I've made my own observations and disagree
with your's based on personal experience. Cheers!
><<XX>:> Buddy
Bob Noble - 24 Oct 2007 07:38 GMT
Hey Buddy,
I agree with you.
All motor cycles should only drive with the lights on most all the time. If
not for yourself, do it for all those in the cars, as they may accidentally
hit you and kill or hurt you and feel real bad about it. They might get hurt
or killed too, so it's just a good idea. Ones family might not be too happy
either if one got hit.
I choose to drive with my cars headlights on all the time and I like the way
the lights go off when I turn off the engine and I don't have to remember to
turn them on when it rains, as that's the law now around here.
Doing things right, one might live long enough to get some experience and
live to a ripe old age, if one doesn't accidently run into one of those
without the lights on. :O)

Signature
Bob Noble
http://www.sonic.net/bnoble
>>
> I understand about using lights as camouflage, the military checked it
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ><<XX>:> Buddy
bigjim@backpacker.com - 22 Oct 2007 20:53 GMT
The effect on bulb life is measurable. I NEVER replaced a headlight
(except to upgrade) in my previous 3 vehicles. My Subaru has had
several bulbs burn out to to DRL's. Maybe some of you are too stupid
to turn on lights at dawn dusk or inclement weather but I've figured
that out. How exactly will I pay for a new car if someone hits me?
THEIR insurance will handle that and the award for pain and injury
will allow me to buy a better car. No big deal.
> > Curious, just what sort of a load drain does having the lights on have on
> > an alternator so that mileage is reduced?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Plus, with the lights on, you are less likely to have to pay for a new car
> cuz someone didn't see your damn fool a.s coming at dusk or in the rain.
Bob Noble - 23 Oct 2007 04:10 GMT
> that out. How exactly will I pay for a new car if someone hits me?
> THEIR insurance will handle that and the award for pain and injury
> will allow me to buy a better car. No big deal.
OK, you really said this?
We'll have them send the check to your grave, so you can have it.
If you get hit, it might not just be your car?

Signature
Bob Noble
http://www.sonic.net/bnoble
VanguardLH - 23 Oct 2007 07:49 GMT
"Can't Choose A Moniker" wrote ...
> Plus, with the lights on, you are less likely to have to pay for a
> new car cuz someone didn't see your damn fool a.s coming at dusk or
> in the rain.
So do we get to shotgun the car trying to take out those superbright
blue-tint headlights that blind others (so the bozo doesn't blind
others with their lights)?
Buddy - 23 Oct 2007 13:36 GMT
here's VanguardLH's last post ->:
> "Can't Choose A Moniker" wrote ...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> blue-tint headlights that blind others (so the bozo doesn't blind others
> with their lights)?
The problem isn't so much the headlights (except that I agree that
those blue-tint lights are very annoying *when they're coming at
you*), it's the fact that the bozo behind you is driving an SUV or
truck or something with a taller profile, but that's still more of
a problem at night than in the daytime.
BTW, my car doesn't have DRL's, I choose when I turn them on or
off. They work though.

Signature
><<XX>:> Buddy