Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Subaru Cars / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire pressure and mileage

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sheldon - 26 Mar 2008 03:54 GMT
I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
setup an appointment.  Meanwhile, I decided to check the tire pressures,
which were about 3 to 5 lbs down.  I pumped them up to 30 all around and my
mileage went up to 24 mpg.

Does this sound plausible?

Sheldon
Tony Hwang - 26 Mar 2008 15:46 GMT
> I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
> called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sheldon

Hmm,
Didn't know that? I always keep pressure little higher than it's called
for. Low pressure not only affect your mileage, it can destroy tire due
to over heating when driving on turn pike. If you raise the pressure too
much it can negatively affect handling and ride. Also when you calculate
mileage you do it over time after several fill up. Not just with one
tank of gas. This is basic stuff.
Sheldon - 27 Mar 2008 03:35 GMT
>> I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>> called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> mileage you do it over time after several fill up. Not just with one tank
> of gas. This is basic stuff.

Did this over two tanks after filling the tires.  The bad mileage was tank
after tank after tank.
Tony Hwang - 27 Mar 2008 04:15 GMT
>>>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>>>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Did this over two tanks after filling the tires.  The bad mileage was tank
> after tank after tank.

Hi,
Also check the pressure when tire is cold.  I fill my tires with
Nitrogen gas from Costco tire shop. Nitrogen is more stable. If pressure
is too low or high yo'll know it when you drive.
BoB - 27 Mar 2008 13:10 GMT
>>>>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>>>>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>Nitrogen gas from Costco tire shop. Nitrogen is more stable. If pressure
>is too low or high yo'll know it when you drive.

My Subaru dealer was filling tires on all new cars with nitrogen and
adding $200 to the total cost. After one year they discontinued this.
I was told they found it added negligible benefits, unlike when it is
used in race cars, so they will use up their nitrogen supply during
repairs only.

I suspect they stopped because they were getting too many complaints
about the added cost.

BoB
suburboturbo - 27 Mar 2008 14:16 GMT
> >>>>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
> >>>>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Even our county police have been running nitrogen for highway patrol.
May give you some benefit but probably not worth the cost.  Now,
helium is the way to go if you really want to reduce unsprung weight.

Seriously, pumping your tires up will not only improve mileage, but
handling as well.  When I used to autocross a Corvair I'd run 50 psi
rear and 30 psi front, with much wider tires on the rear as well due
to the extreme weight imbalance.  For a street Subaru 35 psi, or
whatever the tire manufacturer's maximum is, should optimize gas
mileage, tire life and handling.  And check that air filter.  I belive
the Subaru interval is usually 20,000 miles, but If you've got more
than 10,000 and it's underperforming, it's a good place to start with
a small investment.
Tony Hwang - 27 Mar 2008 15:51 GMT
>>>>>>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>>>>>>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> than 10,000 and it's underperforming, it's a good place to start with
> a small investment.
Hmmm,
I always buy tires from Costco. Nitrogen is used and rotation, repair
all included for the life of tires. They have good selection of
Michelin, Good Year brand. If it is odd size tires, they can special
order them. Price is very reasonable.
Sheldon - 31 Mar 2008 00:53 GMT
On Mar 27, 8:10 am, BoB <m...@box.invalid> wrote:
> >Sheldon wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Even our county police have been running nitrogen for highway patrol.
May give you some benefit but probably not worth the cost.  Now,
helium is the way to go if you really want to reduce unsprung weight.

Seriously, pumping your tires up will not only improve mileage, but
handling as well.  When I used to autocross a Corvair I'd run 50 psi
rear and 30 psi front, with much wider tires on the rear as well due
to the extreme weight imbalance.  For a street Subaru 35 psi, or
whatever the tire manufacturer's maximum is, should optimize gas
mileage, tire life and handling.  And check that air filter.  I belive
the Subaru interval is usually 20,000 miles, but If you've got more
than 10,000 and it's underperforming, it's a good place to start with
a small investment.

>> Have to watch pressures on some cars, especially rear engine rear drive.
>> Tire pressures can drastically affect oversteer and understeer and turn a
>> car like a Porsche into a real handful.
Todd H. - 27 Mar 2008 15:38 GMT
> My Subaru dealer was filling tires on all new cars with nitrogen and
> adding $200 to the total cost.

$200 freakin dollars?   Geeze. Ridiculous.

--
Todd H.
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
Chicago, Illinois USA
John O - 30 Mar 2008 01:50 GMT
>> My Subaru dealer was filling tires on all new cars with nitrogen and
>> adding $200 to the total cost.
>
> $200 freakin dollars?   Geeze. Ridiculous.

An entire cylinder of helium is only $100. Don't know about nitrogen,
probably cheaper.

-John O
Sheldon - 31 Mar 2008 00:50 GMT
>>>>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>>>>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> gas from Costco tire shop. Nitrogen is more stable. If pressure is too low
> or high yo'll know it when you drive.

No nitrogen, but always check pressures when cold and the sun isn't heating
up one side of the car.
John Rethorst - 26 Mar 2008 16:12 GMT
> I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
> called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sheldon

Yes.

Signature

John Rethorst
jrethorst at post dot com

VanguardLH - 26 Mar 2008 17:00 GMT
>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Does this sound plausible?

http://www.google.com/search?q=%2B"low+tire+pressure"+%2Bmileage
Uncle Ben - 26 Mar 2008 19:06 GMT
> I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
> called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sheldon

I say no.  16 mpg is far below what you would expect.  The low tire
pressure let's the effective tire diameter shrink a bit, but not by
that much.  You should be getting 22-24 mpg even in traffic.

From my recent experience with this problem, I'd say try changing the
air filter first.

Ben
.._.. - 26 Mar 2008 21:23 GMT
>I say no.  16 mpg is far below what you would expect.  The low tire
pressure let's the effective tire diameter shrink a bit, but not by
that much.  You should be getting 22-24 mpg even in traffic.

>From my recent experience with this problem, I'd say try changing the
air filter first.

>Ben

A car with low tire pressure probably has a bunch of other places it can be
tweaked to get better milage. (Owner obviously not paying attention.)

Note however, most of the wasted energy is not just diameter reduction, it's
friction bending and unbending the tire every revolution (thus the tire
heating).  Likewise, the car roll resistance is going to be different which
might lead the driver to make huge changes in how they accellerate; keeping
the foot on the gas all the way to braking point, and then braking, rather
than coasting and NOT braking much.

16 mpg is a lot down, but from the standard 24 mpg I can go up a bit, or
would be down to 20 or so just with 5 or 6 pounds of air difference.

Yes, check other stuff, but a change in MPG of 8 isn't that far out of
reasonable for that simple change.
DK - 27 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT
>I noticed my '97 Outback was getting pretty lousy mileage (16 mpg), and
>called my mechanic.  He said to call him back at the end of the week and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Does this sound plausible?

Not to me. 8 mpg is way too much for 3-5 lbs less. I'd expect
something in the 1-3 mpg range.

DK
Rick Courtright - 29 Mar 2008 04:40 GMT
> Does this sound plausible?

Hi,

Yes, it does.

From personal experience, I've found different tires produce quite
different mileage characteristics depending on pressures. Some are
pretty "pressure tolerant" meaning mileage won't suffer much when one
drops a couple of pounds or more. Others REALLY start to show the
difference. (Same issues w/ handling!) As many have suggested, I, too,
run 1-3 lbs over the door sticker w/ most of my tires.

I check them about every two weeks, and keep 'em filled w/ a 78%
nitrogen mixture. It cost me $200 for a pretty good compressor set up to
use that mix... but you can get one for considerably less. ;)

Get a good gauge, too. Some like digitals. I've got a nice one and it's
ok, but I prefer the real Accu-Gauge analogs (there are plenty of cheap
knock-offs but I'd avoid 'em.) Pretty bullet-proof and they never need a
battery. Get the style w/ the built in "bleeder" and you can adjust down
to 1/4 lb increments on the large dial models if you wish (my digital's
only good to 1/2 lb.) Local availability is spotty, so you may want to
go online. I think the name of the place where I ordered my last ones
was called "getagauge.com" or something really close--Google's your
friend.

Pencil gauges aren't on my radar screen anymore: we used to get really
good ones when I worked in service stations back in the
late-'60s/early-'70s, but everything I've seen recently is cheapo,
cheapo and not all that accurate.

Rick
KLS - 29 Mar 2008 13:45 GMT
>Get a good gauge, too. Some like digitals. I've got a nice one and it's
>ok, but I prefer the real Accu-Gauge analogs (there are plenty of cheap
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>was called "getagauge.com" or something really close--Google's your
>friend.

PepBoys sells this brand, and it's pretty good.  The one I bought
recently developed a leak and wasn't accurate anymore, so I sent it
back to the factory with a $3 check for S&H, and they fixed it and
sent it back.  The built-in bleeder button is very handy for double
checking accuracy.  I'm really waiting to see how durable mine will be
before I sing further praises.  I'm still mad at myself for breaking
the Brookstone dial gauge I had for 15 years.  That thing was GREAT.
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 29 Mar 2008 14:39 GMT
>>Does this sound plausible?
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Rick

LOL'ing at 78% nitrogen mix!

hahahahaha!

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

Frank - 29 Mar 2008 17:54 GMT
>> Rick
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl

Stuff I google up says less pressure loss using pure N2:
http://www.tires-inc.com/shop/nitrogen.htm

I was taught that diffusion rates are normally inversely molecular
weight dependent and with N2 at 14 and O2 at 16, the N2 tire should
deflate faster. I suspect it doesn't because of osmotic pressure - the
pressure of O2 trying to get in to dilute the N2.
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 29 Mar 2008 20:40 GMT
>>> Rick
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> deflate faster. I suspect it doesn't because of osmotic pressure - the
> pressure of O2 trying to get in to dilute the N2.

Hah! I wonder if they pull a vacuum before the nitrogen fill?

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

Sheldon - 31 Mar 2008 00:57 GMT
> I was taught that diffusion rates are normally inversely molecular
> weight dependent and with N2 at 14 and O2 at 16, the N2 tire should
> deflate faster. I suspect it doesn't because of osmotic pressure - the
> pressure of O2 trying to get in to dilute the N2.

ROTFLMAO :-D
suburboturbo - 29 Mar 2008 19:43 GMT
> >>Does this sound plausible?
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yup, been using that 78% nitrogen mix for years and agree that it
functions pretty well, both for street and race applications.  If we
could only find some other use for that stuff.  Of course, if all
depends on what makes up that other 22%.  Now, if you really want to
"light 'em up", filling them with hydrogen would reduce rotational
mass, allowing for spectacular wheelspin and provide for some dynamite
burnouts.
Sheldon - 31 Mar 2008 00:55 GMT
>> Does this sound plausible?
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Rick

I have a really good German dial gauge that adjusts for atmospheric
pressure.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.