Transmissions have been constant mesh since the 1930's, except for reverse
(exclude Aston-Martin and similar). That is, there is an input shaft,
primary shaft and a secondary shaft, with the pairs of gears for 1,2,3, and
5. The one piece primary shaft has the gears cut on it. The secondary shaft
has separate gears with the synchro cones/rings. In neutral, the input (from
the engine, via the clutch) spins and there's no connection to the output.
Select a gear and one of the sets of secondary gears is connected to the
primary shaft.
Now, the idea of double declutching is to perform what synchro rings do when
not worn out. The input gear speed, governed by the motor, has to match the
output gear speed, driven by the road wheels. When the speeds are matched
the desired gear can be selected without crunching.
So ... changing say 2nd to 3rd: release the accelerator, depress clutch,
select neutral, release clutch. The engine revs will slow down. When the
engine revs match the road speed for 3rd (this happens in a couple of
seconds), depress clutch and get it into 3rd. If you let the revs drop to
idle, you won't select 3rd without a crunch, and you'll have to give it a
blip in neutral.
In fact, you can change gears without a clutch, with care. I had to do this
once during a forest rally when the clutch cable broke. Getting started was
entertaining: select 1st gear and start engine... drove the car 200km back
home clutchless too.
If you hold some de-select pressure on the stick in 2nd, when you release
the accelerator, the load comes off the transmission, and the stick will
glide perfectly safely into neutral. Keep some 3rd position select pressure,
and when the revs drop to the right speed, it will glide into 3rd, at which
point you get on the gas again.
So ... changing 3rd to 2nd ... always harder, but the same technique. As you
pass through neutral, with the clutch out, give the engine a rev. This
synchronises 2nd road speed with engine speed for that speed.
> Why can't I just rev up the RPMs w/o releasing the clutch and not pausing
> in neutral?
All this does is speed up the engine: when the clutch is in, it does not
cause the input side of the transmission to speed up. In fact it slows down
due to oil viscosity.
-
regards
Stewart DIBBS
www.pixcl.com/lancerproject
runcyclexcski@gmail.com - 19 May 2008 05:27 GMT
> <runcyclexc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> regards
> Stewart DIBBSwww.pixcl.com/lancerproject
Stewart - thanks a lot for your great response.
I was experimenting today with the shifting 2->3 and 4->3 with the
double clutching. I had to find the desired RPMs by trial and error.
So it indeed sounds like between 1.5 K and 2.0 K is the right range of
RPMs to get it to shift smoothly 2 -> 3, and that's at around 25 mph.
Shifting from 4->3, and 2->3, required different RPMs, consistent with
your explanation of the RPMs of the wheels. Ugh!
Assuming that I can learn this while keeping my eye on the traffic, I
would have to start doing this for every gear combination, not just
the 2->3 and 4->3, to keep it simple for my brain to map. A rhetoric
question: what's better - to learn double clutching or to spend the
3K? Also, I wonder how long it will take for the transmission to get
ruined from the fact that I slightly grind it every time I do it wrong
(50% of times so far).
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 20 May 2008 00:44 GMT
>><runcyclexc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> ruined from the fact that I slightly grind it every time I do it wrong
> (50% of times so far).
Do it while saving up for a rebuilt tranny. 'Charge' your self an xtra
$10 everytime you grind a gear!
Carl

Signature
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
runcyclexcski@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 23:02 GMT
> Do it while saving up for a rebuilt tranny. 'Charge' your self an xtra
> $10 everytime you grind a gear!
>
> Carl
I guess, with the current gas prices, investing into a car with this
poor of a mileage is not worth it :(