Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Subaru Cars / December 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

96 legacy 0420 ideas..?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Black Dog - 11 Dec 2008 20:39 GMT
(6 legacy outback, 2.5, 160,000 miles, code for catalytic efficency...
Fuel mileage doesn't seem too good, and am in process checking.
The EGR valve diaphram doesn't move, so I suspect it needs replacing, the
spark plugs have never been replaced as far as I know..., the tailpipe is
black sooty, and the oxygen sensors may need replacing although there is no
code. I was wondering if replacing the plugs, EGR, and oxygen sensors might
prevent me from having to purchase new cats...?...
                                                                  Thanks
                                                                    R.
Dano58 - 11 Dec 2008 21:17 GMT
> (6 legacy outback, 2.5, 160,000 miles, code for catalytic efficency...
>  Fuel mileage doesn't seem too good, and am in process checking.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>                                                                    Thanks
>                                                                      R.

I've heard that this code CAN be caused by bad O2 sensors. Certainly
cheaper to replace them than the cats. But that wouldn't cause a sooty
exhaust. You should replace the plugs anyways, especially if they are
old. They probably aren't that efficient any longer especially if they
are original.

Dan D
'99 Impreza 2.5 RS (son's)
Central NJ USA
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 11 Dec 2008 22:39 GMT
>>(6 legacy outback, 2.5, 160,000 miles, code for catalytic efficency...
>> Fuel mileage doesn't seem too good, and am in process checking.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> '99 Impreza 2.5 RS (son's)
> Central NJ USA

I agree with Dan. That is a lot of mileage and AT LEAST the front O2
sensor must be getting lazy/bad if it is original. If the car has been
running poorly for some time - the cat con COULD be compromised, but, as
said, being the most expensive Item, I'd only do it after addressing the
other issues.

I THINK your car had platinum plugs from the factory(might be the H6es
only get those?). That might explain them lasting this long. You COULD
save a little and go with copper this time - but platinum or iridium
would probably last until the wheels fall off and changing plugs on
these vehicles can be a challenge. Certainly if I were paying a shop
$80/hr - I'd put in the iridiums I think. If I were set up to do all my
own wrenching and didn't mind the work - put the copper in.

More people have fixed the 420 code with o2 sensors I think than with
converters! OEM sensors seem to be much preferred. Check some on-line
dealers to save a little money, or at least ask your local dealer to
match on-line pricing. (I've had good luck with Jamie at
www.subarugenuineparts.com)

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

Black Dog - 12 Dec 2008 01:34 GMT
I figured since it still ran like a scalded dog the cats were not clogged.
And, with the EGR not pulling some N2O the O2 sensors might be feelin it.
The plugs are gonna go platinum as original. I suspect they are the cause of
the richness as well. It was driven by a little old lady before I bought it.
She didn't have the service records. She did tell me it had been serviced
well. By the way... are these cats 3 way or 2 way ? Do you know the original
O2 sensor maker ? I'm planning on getting the EGR from genuinesubaruparts...

                                                     Thanks guys

>>>(6 legacy outback, 2.5, 160,000 miles, code for catalytic efficency...
>>> Fuel mileage doesn't seem too good, and am in process checking.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Carl
Bob Noble - 12 Dec 2008 02:22 GMT
If you had bad plugs they would only cause the engine to miss, not burn
rich.
Plugs only need to be replaced if the engine is missing and it's the plugs
fault and not something else.
You don't need to replace plugs very often these days like the old days.
More likely the o2 sensor telling it to burn rich. Sometimes a bad
connection to it can also cause problem.

Bob Noble
http://www.sonic.net/bnoble

>>>>(6 legacy outback, 2.5, 160,000 miles, code for catalytic efficency...
>>>> Fuel mileage doesn't seem too good, and am in process checking.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>> '99 Impreza 2.5 RS (son's)
>>> Central NJ USA
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 12 Dec 2008 05:00 GMT
>   I figured since it still ran like a scalded dog the cats were not clogged.
> And, with the EGR not pulling some N2O the O2 sensors might be feelin it.
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>>
>>Carl

Be sure to test the Engine Temp Sensor (not coolant gauge sender). It
can sometimes fail in such a way to keep the ECU in 'choke' condition
and may not throw a code. If poor maintenance is suspected - the brake
fluid shouyld be flushed - it can have a lot of water in it. The tranny
should be flushed or perhaps have 2-3 drain/fill cycles at least. The
Tires MUST be the same model and wear, differences of 1/4" in
CIRCUMFERENCE are discouraged by Subaru due to torque bind/center diff
(or clutch pack) stress. Probably could use a coolant flush too. Be sure
to search and read about 'burping' the coolant system. Probably needs a
PCV valve as well. Might as well consider radiator cap and maybe
thermostat. Um, do you know if the timing belt was changed? If you can't
be certain, pull the covers and inspect it. Do that immediately. It
would be a shame to get the other issues solved and throw a TB! Inspect
all the axle boots for splits too.

whew!

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

marc.wert.mail@gmail.com - 12 Dec 2008 18:56 GMT
> >   I figured since it still ran like a scalded dog the cats were not clogged.
> > And, with the EGR not pulling some N2O the O2 sensors might be feelin it.
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
> --
> to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

are you serious "differences of 1/4" in CIRCUMFERENCE"
if the tire diameter is 24" then 24" * 3.14 = 75.36"
75.36" + .25" = 75.61"
75.61" / 3.14 = 24.079"
so every tire has to be within .04" diameter of each other
or each tread depth has to be within .02" of each other.
how do you measure this?
how do you make this stuff up?
if you don't know the facts keep quiet.
don't spew in accurate information.
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 12 Dec 2008 23:32 GMT
>>>  I figured since it still ran like a scalded dog the cats were not clogged.
>>>And, with the EGR not pulling some N2O the O2 sensors might be feelin it.
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
> if you don't know the facts keep quiet.
> don't spew in accurate information.

Ahem;

******4. Do I have to replace all four tires on my AWD Subaru?

All of the tires on your AWD Subaru must be within 1/4 of an inch of
rolling circumference (part that touches the road). This is because of
our All Wheel Drive System.

Proper rotation of the tires at the appropriate service intervals will
increase the life expectancy of your tires. This will also ensure that
all four tires stay relatively equal in their tire tread wear. When
vehicles are serviced, tires should be routinely checked to ensure that
the alignment and tires are in good working condition. ******

from;http://www.subaru.com/common/faq/tech_info.jsp#3

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

marc.wert.mail@gmail.com - 14 Dec 2008 05:08 GMT
> marc.wert.m...@gmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 108 lines]
> --
> to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

I sincerely apologize to the contributor who was quoting Subaru text.
Unfortunately someone at Subaru pulled some numbers from the air or
some where else and put it on a web site and now it is fact.  I'm
sorry but I cant believe even Subaru corporate cars have all their
tires within this spec.
Carl 1 Lucky Texan - 14 Dec 2008 16:26 GMT
>>marc.wert.m...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 114 lines]
> sorry but I cant believe even Subaru corporate cars have all their
> tires within this spec.

Subaru may very well be encouraging rather strict adherence to tire
wear/size parameters because they know that the reality folks will
experience is greater than 1/4". However, Subaru is not the only maker
of AWD cars and I suspect any AWD drive could experience damage if
regularly operated on dry pavement with mixed size tires. Most systems
will respond to an undersized tire as 'slippage' and could experience
torque bind. If that stress is not relived, some drivetrain component
will be damaged.

There are various approaches to use of undersized tires. Some cars with
open front and rear diffs might be able to put new tires on one side for
instance.(limited slip rear diffs would preclude that approach). Some
folks can find shops that will shave a new tire down to mix in with
older tires.  Generally, the savings from having 2 tires treated that
way would make buying 4 new tires a better choice overall.

Rotate your tires and make sure you understand what your manual says
about use of spare tires and emergency towing, etc.

High/special performance cars often require special care in one or more
areas. Subaru AWD needs the tires to be the same size. How far you can
deviate from that and not experience drivetrain problems? ..  who knows?
Too many other factors to consider. If you frequently drive on gravel,
dirt or wet surfaces and make lots of turns - there's plenty of
opportunity for any binding to relieve itself. If you drive many miles
on staright, dry highways - you could significantly shorten the life of
your center diff/wet clutchpack or other drivetrain component.

Carl

Signature

to reply, change  ( .not)  to  ( .net)

Dano58 - 19 Dec 2008 20:13 GMT
> > I sincerely apologize to the contributor who was quoting Subaru text.
> > Unfortunately someone at Subaru pulled some numbers from the air or
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Carl

Carl, you're right, Audi has the same spec with the quattro system.
However, in general, as long as the tires on the same axle are within
spec, you're okay. You generally don't need to replace all 4.

Dan D
'99 Impreza 2.5 RS (son's)
'04 Audi A4 1.8T quattro 6-speed (mine's ;-)
Central NJ USA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.